Xiang Jinbiao, Zhong Liusheng, Yuan Zhixiong, Liang Liqin, Yang Zhangzhen, Xiao Yanmei, Fu Zhiqiang, Long Pan, Huang Cheng, Xu Ying
College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China.
Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Crop Physiology and Molecular Biology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China.
Plants (Basel). 2024 May 31;13(11):1527. doi: 10.3390/plants13111527.
The ratoon rice cropping pattern is an alternative to the double-season rice cropping pattern in central China due to its comparable annual yield and relatively lower cost and labor requirements. However, the impact of the ratoon rice cropping pattern on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and yields in the double-season rice region requires further investigation. Here, we compared two cropping patterns, fallow-double season rice (DR) and fallow-ratoon rice (RR), by using two early-season rice varieties (ZJZ17, LY287) and two late-season rice varieties (WY103, TY390) for DR, and two ratoon rice varieties (YLY911, LY6326) for RR. The six varieties constituted four treatments, including DR1 (ZJZ17 + WY103), DR2 (LY287 + TY390), RR1 (YLY911), and RR2 (LY6326). The experimental results showed that conversion from DR to RR cropping pattern significantly altered the GHG emissions, global warming potential (GWP), and GWP per unit yield (yield-scaled GWP). Compared with DR, the RR cropping pattern significantly increased cumulative methane (CH), nitrous oxide (NO), and carbon dioxide (CO) emissions by 65.73%, 30.56%, and 47.13%, respectively, in the first cropping season. Conversely, in the second cropping season, the RR cropping pattern effectively reduced cumulative CH, NO, and CO emissions by 79.86%, 27.18%, and 30.31%, respectively. RR led to significantly lower annual cumulative CH emissions, but no significant difference in cumulative annual NO and CO emissions compared with DR. In total, the RR cropping pattern reduced the annual GWP by 7.38% and the annual yield-scaled GWP by 2.48% when compared to the DR cropping pattern. Rice variety also showed certain effects on the yields and GHG emissions in different RR cropping patterns. Compared with RR1, RR2 significantly increased annual yield while decreasing annual GWP and annual yield-scaled GWP. In conclusion, the LY6326 RR cropping pattern may be a highly promising strategy to simultaneously reduce GWP and maintain high grain yield in double-season rice regions in central China.
再生稻种植模式因其年产量相当且成本和劳动力需求相对较低,是中国中部双季稻种植模式的一种替代方案。然而,再生稻种植模式对双季稻区温室气体(GHG)排放和产量的影响仍需进一步研究。在此,我们比较了两种种植模式,即休耕-双季稻(DR)和休耕-再生稻(RR),其中DR使用了两个早稻品种(ZJZ17、LY287)和两个晚稻品种(WY103、TY390),RR使用了两个再生稻品种(YLY911、LY6326)。这六个品种构成了四个处理,包括DR1(ZJZ17 + WY103)、DR2(LY287 + TY390)、RR1(YLY911)和RR2(LY6326)。实验结果表明,从DR种植模式转换为RR种植模式显著改变了温室气体排放、全球变暖潜势(GWP)以及单位产量的全球变暖潜势(产量缩放全球变暖潜势)。与DR相比,RR种植模式在第一季种植中,甲烷(CH)、氧化亚氮(NO)和二氧化碳(CO)的累积排放量分别显著增加了65.73%、30.56%和47.13%。相反,在第二季种植中,RR种植模式有效地将CH、NO和CO的累积排放量分别减少了79.86%、27.18%和30.31%。RR导致年度CH累积排放量显著降低,但与DR相比,年度NO和CO累积排放量无显著差异。总体而言,与DR种植模式相比,RR种植模式使年度全球变暖潜势降低了7.38%,单位产量全球变暖潜势降低了2.48%。水稻品种对不同RR种植模式下的产量和温室气体排放也有一定影响。与RR1相比,RR2显著提高了年产量,同时降低了年度全球变暖潜势和单位产量全球变暖潜势。总之,LY6326 RR种植模式可能是中国中部双季稻区同时降低全球变暖潜势和维持高粮食产量的一种极具前景的策略。