• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2011 年至 2021 年中期的泌尿科风险投资。

Venture capital investment in urology, 2011 to mid-2021.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Can J Urol. 2023 Oct;30(5):11659-11667.

PMID:37838992
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To characterize venture capital (VC) investments in urology in the past decade that represent promising innovations in early-stage companies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of deals made between VC investors and urologic companies from January 1, 2011, through June 28, 2021, was conducted by using a financial database (PitchBook Platform, PitchBook Data Inc). Data on urologic company and investor names; company information and funding categories (surgical device, therapeutic device, drug discovery/pharmaceutical, and health care technology companies); and deal sizes (in US dollars) and dates were abstracted and aggregated. Descriptive and linear regression analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Urology-related VC funding fluctuated from 2011 through mid-2021, but no substantial change was observed in funding over time. In total, 191 distinct deals were made involving urologic companies, totaling $1.1 billion. The four largest funding categories together accounted for $848 million and comprised therapeutic devices ($373 million), surgical devices ($187 million), drug discovery/pharmaceuticals ($185 million), and health care technology ($102 million). At least $450 million (41% of total investments) was invested in companies developing minimally invasive surgical devices.

CONCLUSIONS

Urologic VC investments did not increase in the past decade and were allocated more toward devices than pharmaceuticals or health care technology. Given relative patterns within urology, VC investments may shift toward health care technology and away from pharmaceuticals but remain stable for devices. Further investments in promising technologies may help urologists more effectively manage urologic disease while optimizing outcomes.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在分析过去十年中风险投资(VC)在泌尿外科领域的投资情况,这些投资代表了早期公司中有前途的创新。

材料与方法

通过使用金融数据库(PitchBook Platform,PitchBook Data Inc.),对 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 28 日期间 VC 投资者与泌尿外科公司之间的交易进行了回顾性分析。提取并汇总了泌尿外科公司和投资者名称、公司信息和融资类别(手术器械、治疗器械、药物发现/制药和医疗技术公司)以及交易规模(以美元计)和日期的数据。进行了描述性和线性回归分析。

结果

2011 年至 2021 年中期,泌尿外科相关 VC 资金波动不定,但随着时间的推移,资金没有明显变化。总共涉及泌尿外科公司的 191 笔不同交易,总额为 11 亿美元。最大的四个融资类别共占 8.48 亿美元,包括治疗器械(3.73 亿美元)、手术器械(1.87 亿美元)、药物发现/制药(1.85 亿美元)和医疗技术(1.02 亿美元)。至少有 4.5 亿美元(总投资的 41%)投资于开发微创外科器械的公司。

结论

过去十年中,泌尿外科 VC 投资并未增加,并且更多地投向器械而非制药或医疗技术。鉴于泌尿外科内部的相对模式,VC 投资可能会转向医疗技术,远离制药业,但设备投资仍保持稳定。对有前途的技术进行更多投资可能有助于泌尿科医生更有效地治疗泌尿系统疾病,同时优化治疗效果。

相似文献

1
Venture capital investment in urology, 2011 to mid-2021.2011 年至 2021 年中期的泌尿科风险投资。
Can J Urol. 2023 Oct;30(5):11659-11667.
2
Increasing venture capital investment in spinal surgery: an analysis of investments from 2000 to 2023.脊柱外科领域风险投资的增加:对2000年至2023年投资情况的分析
Spine J. 2025 Jan;25(1):55-58. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.014. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
3
Association of the Meaningful Use Electronic Health Record Incentive Program With Health Information Technology Venture Capital Funding.有意义使用电子健康记录激励计划与健康信息技术风险投资资金之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201402. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1402.
4
Venture Capital Investment in Orthopaedics: Has the Landscape Changed over the Past Two Decades (2000-2019)?骨科领域的风险投资:在过去的二十年(2000-2019 年)中,格局是否发生了变化?
Surg Innov. 2022 Feb;29(1):103-110. doi: 10.1177/15533506211031072. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
5
Venture Capital's Role in Advancing Plastic Surgery.风险投资在推动整形手术发展中的作用。
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2024 Aug 27;6:ojae064. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojae064. eCollection 2024.
6
The Value of Scientific Publications in Surgical Device Innovation.外科器械创新中的科学出版物价值。
Surg Innov. 2023 Oct;30(5):615-621. doi: 10.1177/15533506221143267. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
7
Hurdles in tissue engineering/regenerative medicine product commercialization: a pilot survey of governmental funding agencies and the financial industry.组织工程/再生医学产品商业化中的障碍:政府资助机构和金融行业的试点调查。
Tissue Eng Part A. 2012 Nov;18(21-22):2187-94. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2012.0186. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
8
Factors Affecting Venture Funding of Healthcare AI Companies.影响医疗人工智能公司风险投资的因素。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Jul 4;262:268-271. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190070.
9
Physician entrepreneur: lessons learned in raising capital for biomedical innovation.医生型创业者:为生物医药创新融资的经验教训。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010 Apr;23(2):209-17. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32833732fa.
10
Impact of COVID-19 on Characteristics and Funding of U.S. Healthcare Startups: Retrospective Review.COVID-19 对美国医疗保健初创企业的特征和资金的影响:回顾性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Aug 27;8:e56327. doi: 10.2196/56327.