Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Mar;157(3):290-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.10.009.
Minimally invasive micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) look promising for a routine acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). The objective of this research was to systematically evaluate evidence regarding the effects of MOPs on the OTM rate, treatment duration, and associated complications.
Electronic database and hand search of English literature in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, and clinical trial.gov, with author clarification were performed. The selection criteria were randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing MOPs with conventional treatment involving both extraction and nonextraction. Cochrane's risk of bias tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach were used for quality assessment. Studies were analyzed with chi-square-based Q statistic methods, I index, fixed-effects, and random-effects model. Quantitative analysis was done on homogenous studies using Review Manager.
Eight RCTs were included for the qualitative analysis. Meta-analysis of 2 homogenous studies indicated insignificant effect with MOPs (0.01 mm less OTM; 95% CI, 0.13-0.11; P = 0.83). No difference (P >0.05) was found in anchorage loss, root resorption, gingival recession, and pain.
Meta-analysis of 2 low-risk of bias studies showed no effect with single application MOPs over a short observation period; however, the overall evidence was low. The quality of evidence for MOP side effects ranged from high to low. Future studies are suggested to investigate repeated MOPs effect over the entire treatment duration for different models of OTM and its related biological changes.
PROSPERO CDR42019118642.
微创微骨穿孔术(MOPs)有望常规加速正畸牙齿移动(OTM)。本研究的目的是系统评估 MOPs 对 OTM 速率、治疗持续时间和相关并发症影响的证据。
通过电子数据库和手动搜索 PubMed、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、Embase、Web of Science 和 clinical trial.gov 的英文文献,并与作者进行澄清,进行了研究。选择标准是比较 MOPs 与涉及拔牙和非拔牙的常规治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具和推荐评估、制定和评估方法(GRADE)进行质量评估。使用基于卡方的 Q 统计方法、I 指数、固定效应和随机效应模型对研究进行分析。使用 Review Manager 对同质研究进行定量分析。
纳入了 8 项 RCT 进行定性分析。对 2 项同质研究的荟萃分析表明,MOPs 效果不显著(OTM 减少 0.01mm;95%CI,0.13-0.11;P=0.83)。在支抗丧失、牙根吸收、牙龈退缩和疼痛方面没有差异(P>0.05)。
对 2 项低偏倚风险研究的荟萃分析表明,在短观察期内,单次应用 MOPs 没有效果;然而,总体证据水平较低。MOP 副作用的证据质量从高到低不等。建议未来的研究调查在整个治疗期间重复 MOPs 对不同 OTM 模型及其相关生物学变化的影响。
PROSPERO CDR42019118642。