Suppr超能文献

超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞与假手术在急诊就诊肋骨骨折成年患者中的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验。

Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block compared to sham procedure in adult patients with rib fractures presenting to the emergency department: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine & Trauma, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India.

Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Apr;31(4):316-325. doi: 10.1111/acem.14820. Epub 2023 Oct 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with a sham procedure in adult patients presenting with rib fractures to the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was conducted at an academic ED over a 17-month period. Forty-six adults with confirmed rib fractures and numeric rating score (NRS) greater than 4 were randomized to one of two treatment arms: ultrasound-guided ESPB group or placebo (sham procedure). Intravenous opioids were prescribed as rescue analgesia when self-reported pain scores were ≥4. The primary outcome measure, pain intensity reduction, was derived using the 11-point NRS at six time points over 12 h. Secondary outcome measures included the amount of rescue analgesia, in morphine equivalents, and the occurrence of adverse events. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was used to compare the trend in NRSs across the two arms. The association between the complications and intervention was explored using the Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients (23 in each arm) completed the study. There was no difference between treatment groups with respect to age, sex, vital signs, preenrollment analgesia, or baseline pain intensity. In comparing pain intensity during the study period, NRS scores at 30, 60, and 120 min were significantly lower in the ESPB group (p < 0.001) during rest and deep inspiration. Moreover, patients in the ESPB group received lesser rescue analgesia than those in the sham group (10 mg, IQR 2.5 vs. 20 mg, IQR 5 mg; p ≤ 0.01). There was no difference in adverse events between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided ESPB resulted in significantly reduced pain intensity over the study period and reduced amount of rescue analgesia and had no discernible difference in adverse events when compared with a sham.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)与假操作在因肋骨骨折而到急诊科就诊的成年患者中的镇痛效果。

方法

这是一项在学术型急诊科进行的为期 17 个月的随机对照试验。将 46 例确诊肋骨骨折且数字评分量表(NRS)>4 分的成年患者随机分为两组:超声引导 ESPB 组或安慰剂(假操作)组。当自我报告的疼痛评分≥4 分时,开具静脉阿片类药物作为解救性镇痛。在 12 小时内的 6 个时间点使用 11 分 NRS 评估主要结局指标(疼痛强度降低)。次要结局指标包括解救性镇痛的吗啡等效物用量和不良事件的发生情况。使用双向重复测量方差分析比较两组的 NRS 趋势。使用 Fisher 精确检验探索并发症与干预之间的关联。

结果

46 例患者(每组 23 例)完成了研究。两组患者在年龄、性别、生命体征、入组前镇痛和基线疼痛强度方面无差异。在比较研究期间的疼痛强度时,ESPB 组在休息和深吸气时 30、60 和 120 分钟的 NRS 评分显著低于假操作组(p<0.001)。此外,ESPB 组患者接受的解救性镇痛少于假操作组(10mg,IQR 2.5 vs. 20mg,IQR 5mg;p≤0.01)。两组不良事件发生率无差异。

结论

与假操作相比,超声引导 ESPB 可显著降低研究期间的疼痛强度,减少解救性镇痛的用量,且不良事件无明显差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验