Suppr超能文献

急诊室竖脊肌平面阻滞与常规护理治疗机械性背痛的对比:一项初步研究。

The erector spinae plane block vs. usual care for treatment of mechanical back pain in the emergency department: a pilot study.

作者信息

Ho Ben, Fyfe-Brown Ryan, Chopra Shelly, McMeel Kevin

机构信息

Emergency department, Department of Emergency Medicine, Nanaimo Regional General Hospital, University of BC, Nanaimo, BC, Canada.

出版信息

CJEM. 2024 Aug;26(8):543-548. doi: 10.1007/s43678-024-00748-7. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB), traditionally utilized for thoracic regional pain control, has been reported as an effective analgesic option for mechanical back pain, renal colic, and rib fractures in the emergency department (ED). This pilot study aims to compare the effectiveness of the ESPB to usual analgesic treatment for patients presenting to the ED with mechanical back pain.

METHODS

A prospective, single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted at a Canadian community hospital from March 2020 to December 2022. Adult patients presenting to the ED with mechanical back pain of at least 7 out of 10 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) were randomized to receive either the ESPB or usual care. The primary outcome was the difference in NPRS score reduction at ED discharge. Secondary outcomes included ED length of stay, ED opiate use, follow-up NPRS and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) scores, back pain-related return ED visits, and ongoing opiate use.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients were enrolled, with 19 randomized to the ESPB cohort and 11 to the usual care cohort. The mean NPRS reduction at ED discharge was significantly higher in the ESPB group compared to the usual care group (5.4 vs. 2.2), with a difference of 3.2 (95% confidence interval 1.4-5.1). ED opiate use was lower in the ESPB group. The ESPB also resulted in a significant reduction in ED length of stay (160 min vs. 235 min). There were no reported adverse effects related to the research interventions.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study suggests that the ESPB may be an effective opioid-sparing analgesic option for patients presenting to the ED with mechanical back pain.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT05982483.

摘要

背景

超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)传统上用于胸部区域疼痛控制,据报道,它是急诊科(ED)治疗机械性背痛、肾绞痛和肋骨骨折的一种有效镇痛方法。这项前瞻性研究旨在比较ESPB与常规镇痛治疗对因机械性背痛到急诊科就诊患者的有效性。

方法

2020年3月至2022年12月在加拿大一家社区医院进行了一项前瞻性、单盲随机对照试验。因机械性背痛到急诊科就诊且数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)评分至少为7分的成年患者被随机分为接受ESPB或常规护理两组。主要结局是急诊科出院时NPRS评分降低的差异。次要结局包括急诊科住院时间、急诊科阿片类药物使用情况、随访时的NPRS和简明疼痛量表(BPI)评分、与背痛相关的再次到急诊科就诊情况以及持续的阿片类药物使用情况。

结果

共纳入30例患者,19例随机分配到ESPB组,11例分配到常规护理组。与常规护理组相比,ESPB组在急诊科出院时NPRS平均降低幅度显著更高(5.4对2.2),差值为3.2(95%置信区间1.4 - 5.1)。ESPB组的急诊科阿片类药物使用量较低。ESPB还使急诊科住院时间显著缩短(160分钟对235分钟)。未报告与研究干预相关的不良反应。

结论

这项前瞻性研究表明,对于因机械性背痛到急诊科就诊的患者,ESPB可能是一种有效的减少阿片类药物使用的镇痛方法。

政府标识符

NCT05982483。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验