• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用镶嵌猪生物瓣膜并同期行二尖瓣修复术的主动脉瓣置换术的中期结果

Mid-term outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement using a mosaic porcine bioprosthesis with concomitant mitral valve repair.

作者信息

Sugimori Haruhiko, Nakao Tatsuya, Okada Yukikatsu, Okita Yutaka, Yaku Hitoshi, Kobayashi Junjiro, Uesugi Hideyuki, Takanashi Shuichiro, Ito Toshiaki, Koyama Tadaaki, Sakaguchi Taichi, Yamamoto Kouji, Yoshikawa Yasushi, Sawa Yoshiki

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, New Tokyo Hospital, 1271 Wanagaya, Matsudo, Chiba, 270-2232, Japan.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Midori Hospital, 1-16 Edayoshi, Nishi-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 651-2133, Japan.

出版信息

Heart Vessels. 2024 Mar;39(3):252-265. doi: 10.1007/s00380-023-02325-x. Epub 2023 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00380-023-02325-x
PMID:37843552
Abstract

This study retrospectively evaluated the mid-term outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) using a stented porcine aortic valve bioprosthesis (Mosaic; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) with concomitant mitral valve (MV) repair. From 1999 to 2014, 157 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 75 [70-79] years; 47% women) underwent SAVR with concomitant MV repair (SAVR + MV repair), and 1045 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 76 [70-80] years; 54% women) underwent SAVR only at 10 centers in Japan as part of the long-term multicenter Japan Mosaic valve (J-MOVE) study. The 5-year overall survival rate was 81.5% ± 4.1% in the SAVR + MV repair group and 85.1% ± 1.4% in the SAVR only group, and the 8-year overall survival rates were 75.2% ± 5.7% and 78.1% ± 2.1%, respectively. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed no significant difference in the survival rates between the two groups (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.40; P = 0.576). Among women with mild or moderate mitral regurgitation who were not receiving dialysis, those who underwent SAVR + MV repair, were aged > 75 years, and had a preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction of 30-75% tended to have a lower mortality risk. In conclusion, this subgroup analysis of the J-MOVE cohort showed relevant mid-term outcomes after SAVR + MV repair.

摘要

本研究回顾性评估了使用带支架猪主动脉瓣生物假体(Mosaic;美敦力公司,美国明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯)并同期进行二尖瓣(MV)修复的外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)的中期结果。1999年至2014年,157例患者(年龄中位数[四分位间距]为75[70 - 79]岁;47%为女性)接受了SAVR并同期进行MV修复(SAVR + MV修复),1045例患者(年龄中位数[四分位间距]为76[70 - 80]岁;54%为女性)在日本的10个中心仅接受了SAVR,这是长期多中心日本Mosaic瓣膜(J - MOVE)研究的一部分。SAVR + MV修复组的5年总生存率为81.5%±4.1%,仅SAVR组为85.1%±1.4%,8年总生存率分别为75.2%±5.7%和78.1%±2.1%。Cox比例风险分析显示两组生存率无显著差异(风险比,0.87;95%置信区间,0.54 - 1.40;P = 0.576)。在未接受透析的轻度或中度二尖瓣反流女性中,接受SAVR + MV修复、年龄>75岁且术前左心室射血分数为30 - 75%的患者死亡风险往往较低。总之,J - MOVE队列的这一亚组分析显示了SAVR + MV修复后的相关中期结果。

相似文献

1
Mid-term outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement using a mosaic porcine bioprosthesis with concomitant mitral valve repair.使用镶嵌猪生物瓣膜并同期行二尖瓣修复术的主动脉瓣置换术的中期结果
Heart Vessels. 2024 Mar;39(3):252-265. doi: 10.1007/s00380-023-02325-x. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
2
Efficacy of Stentless Aortic Bioprosthesis Implantation for Aortic Stenosis with Small Aortic Annulus.无支架生物主动脉瓣置换术治疗小主动脉瓣环主动脉瓣狭窄的疗效
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;63(6):446-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1389106. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
3
Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Patients at High Risk for Surgery: A Study of Echocardiographic Change and Risk Prediction.高危手术患者中经导管主动脉瓣自膨胀置换术与外科瓣膜置换术的比较:一项关于超声心动图变化及风险预测的研究
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003426.
4
Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of percutaneous and surgical bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis.经皮和外科生物瓣膜治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄的血流动力学性能比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 May 19;53(20):1883-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.060.
5
Mid-term outcomes of Sapien 3 versus Perimount Magna Ease for treatment of severe aortic stenosis.Sapien 3与Perimount Magna Ease治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄的中期结果
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jun 29;15(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01203-1.
6
Mitral valve repair versus replacement in patients with ischaemic mitral regurgitation and depressed ejection fraction: risk factors for early and mid-term mortality†.缺血性二尖瓣反流伴射血分数降低患者二尖瓣修复与置换:早期和中期死亡率的危险因素†
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Jul;19(1):64-9. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu066. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
7
National Trends and Outcomes of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement With Concomitant Mitral Valve Surgery.主动脉瓣置换术同期行二尖瓣手术的国家趋势和结果。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Jul;40:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.11.016. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
8
Long-Term Outcomes of the Mosaic Aortic Porcine Bioprosthesis in Japan - Results From the Japan Mosaic Valve Long-Term Multicenter Study.日本镶嵌式主动脉猪生物瓣的长期结果——来自日本镶嵌式瓣膜长期多中心研究的结果。
Circ J. 2020 Jul 22;84(8):1261-1270. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1113. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
9
Long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement using a 19-mm bioprosthesis.使用 19 毫米生物瓣进行主动脉瓣置换术后的长期结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Feb 18;61(3):625-634. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab379.
10
Mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated surgical aortic bioprosthesis: Insights from PARTNER 2 Valve-in-Valve Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗退行性外科生物瓣二尖瓣反流患者:PARTNER 2 瓣中瓣注册研究的见解。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Oct 1;96(4):981-986. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28811. Epub 2020 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Stuck Prosthetic Valves: Clinical Implications of Pannus Formation and Gradient Measurement in Surgical Outcomes.卡瓣的人工瓣膜:血管翳形成和梯度测量对手术结果的临床影响
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 15;14(2):515. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020515.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of mitral regurgitation aetiology on the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.二尖瓣反流病因对经导管主动脉瓣植入术结局的影响。
EuroIntervention. 2023 Aug 21;19(6):526-536. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-01062.
2
Heart Xenotransplant: A Door That Is Finally Opening.心脏异种移植:终于开启的一扇门。
Circulation. 2022 Mar 22;145(12):871-873. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059277. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
3
Pig-heart transplantation surgeons look to the next steps.猪心脏移植外科医生展望后续步骤。
Lancet. 2022 Jan 22;399(10322):347. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00097-6.
4
Secondary mitral regurgitation repair techniques and outcomes: Subannular repair techniques in secondary mitral regurgitation type IIIb.继发性二尖瓣反流修复技术及结果:Ⅲb型继发性二尖瓣反流的瓣环下修复技术
JTCVS Tech. 2021 Sep 16;10:92-97. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.09.019. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
Five-year outcomes of mild paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后轻度瓣周漏的 5 年结果。
EuroIntervention. 2022 May 15;18(1):33-42. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00784.
6
Reduction of tethering distance by papillary muscle tugging approximation with mitral valve replacement for non-ischemic functional mitral regurgitation induces left ventricular reverse remodeling.乳头肌牵拉拉近术联合二尖瓣置换术治疗非缺血性功能性二尖瓣反流可减少牵拉力,诱导左心室逆重构。
J Cardiol. 2022 Apr;79(4):530-536. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.10.017. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
7
Effect of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Concomitant Mitral Regurgitation and Its Impact on Mortality.经导管主动脉瓣置换术对合并二尖瓣反流的影响及其对死亡率的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jun 14;14(11):1181-1192. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.02.030. Epub 2021 May 12.
8
Mitral Regurgitation in Patients With Coexisting Chronic Aortic Regurgitation: An Evidence-Based Narrative Review.合并慢性主动脉瓣反流的二尖瓣反流患者:基于证据的叙述性综述。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Nov;35(11):3404-3415. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
9
Predictors and Outcome Impact of Mitral Regurgitation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后二尖瓣反流的预测因素及其对预后的影响。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021 Nov;32:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.12.032. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
10
2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2020美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):e72-e227. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923. Epub 2020 Dec 17.