• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An observational study of pain severity, cannabis use, and benefit expenditures in work disability.一项关于疼痛严重程度、大麻使用和工作残疾福利支出的观察性研究。
Can J Public Health. 2024 Feb;115(1):157-167. doi: 10.17269/s41997-023-00821-1. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
2
Cannabis use among workers with work-related injuries and illnesses: results from a cross-sectional study of workers' compensation claimants in Ontario, Canada.工人因工作相关伤和病使用大麻的情况:安大略省工人赔偿索赔者的横断面研究结果。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 18;13(7):e072994. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072994.
3
Examining age differences in duration of wage replacement by injury characteristics.考察因伤特征导致的工资替代时长的年龄差异。
Occup Med (Lond). 2016 Dec;66(9):698-705. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqw168. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
4
Cohort profile: the Ontario Life After Workplace Injury Study (OLAWIS).队列研究概况:安大略省工作场所伤害后生活研究(OLAWIS)。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 6;11(9):e048143. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048143.
5
Relationship between early prescription dispensing patterns and work disability in a cohort of low back pain workers' compensation claimants: a historical cohort study.早期处方配药模式与腰痛工人赔偿索赔队列中工作残疾的关系:一项历史队列研究。
Occup Environ Med. 2019 Aug;76(8):573-581. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2018-105626. Epub 2019 May 15.
6
Cohort profile: workers' compensation in a changing Australian labour market: the return to work (RTW) study.队列资料简介:变化中的澳大利亚劳动力市场中的工人赔偿:重返工作岗位(RTW)研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 8;7(11):e016366. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016366.
7
Medical expenditures associated with nonfatal occupational injuries among U.S. workers reporting persistent disabilities.美国报告患有持续性残疾的工人中与非致命职业伤害相关的医疗支出。
Disabil Health J. 2015 Jul;8(3):397-406. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
8
Disability management outcomes in the Ontario long-term care sector.安大略省长期护理部门的残疾管理结果。
J Occup Rehabil. 2010 Dec;20(4):481-8. doi: 10.1007/s10926-010-9248-2.
9
Are age-related differences in the consequence of work injury greater when occupational physical demands are high?当职业体力需求较高时,工伤后果方面与年龄相关的差异会更大吗?
Am J Ind Med. 2014 Apr;57(4):438-44. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22303. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
10
Factors associated with early magnetic resonance imaging utilization for acute occupational low back pain: a population-based study from Washington State workers' compensation.与急性职业性下腰痛早期磁共振成像利用相关的因素:来自华盛顿州工人赔偿的基于人群的研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Sep 1;37(19):1708-18. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823a03cc.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-sectional analysis of cannabis use at work in the USA: differences by occupational risk level and state-level cannabis laws.美国工作场所大麻使用情况的横断面分析:按职业风险水平和州级大麻法律划分的差异
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Aug 4;3(2):e001589. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001589. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Workplace and non-workplace cannabis use and the risk of workplace injury: Findings from a longitudinal study of Canadian workers.工作场所和非工作场所的大麻使用与工作场所伤害风险:一项对加拿大工人的纵向研究结果。
Can J Public Health. 2023 Dec;114(6):947-955. doi: 10.17269/s41997-023-00795-0. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
2
Association of persistent pain with the incidence of chronic conditions following a disabling work-related injury.持续性疼痛与工作相关致残性损伤后慢性疾病发病的相关性。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023 Jul 1;49(5):330-340. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4096. Epub 2023 Apr 30.
3
Risk Factors to Persistent Pain Following Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Systematic Literature Review.肌肉骨骼损伤后持续疼痛的风险因素:系统文献回顾。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 29;19(15):9318. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159318.
4
Impact of persistent pain symptoms on work absence, health status and employment 18 months following disabling work-related injury or illness.持续性疼痛症状对因工伤或疾病致残18个月后的缺勤、健康状况及就业情况的影响。
Occup Environ Med. 2022 Jul 28;79(10):697-705. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2022-108383.
5
Prevalence of cannabis use for pain management in Quebec: A post-legalization estimate among generations living with chronic pain.魁北克省用于疼痛管理的大麻使用情况:合法化后对慢性疼痛患者各代人群的估计
Can J Pain. 2022 Jun 3;6(1):65-77. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2022.2051112. eCollection 2022.
6
Long-term observational studies with cannabis-based medicines for chronic non-cancer pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety.长期观察性研究显示,大麻类药物治疗慢性非癌症疼痛具有有效性和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Pain. 2022 Jul;26(6):1221-1233. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1957. Epub 2022 May 13.
7
Self-Reported Medical and Nonmedical Cannabis Use: Results from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System in 14 States.自我报告的医用和非医用大麻使用情况:来自 14 个州 2018 年行为风险因素监测系统的数据。
J Community Health. 2022 Aug;47(4):641-649. doi: 10.1007/s10900-021-01049-1. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
8
Prevalence and self-reported reasons of cannabis use for medical purposes in USA and Canada.美国和加拿大医用大麻使用的流行情况和自我报告原因。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 May;239(5):1509-1519. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-06047-8. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
9
Cohort profile: the Ontario Life After Workplace Injury Study (OLAWIS).队列研究概况:安大略省工作场所伤害后生活研究(OLAWIS)。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 6;11(9):e048143. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048143.
10
Patterns and correlates of workplace and non-workplace cannabis use among Canadian workers before the legalization of non-medical cannabis.在加拿大非医用大麻合法化之前,加拿大工人在工作场所和非工作场所使用大麻的模式和相关因素。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Jan 1;218:108386. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108386. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

一项关于疼痛严重程度、大麻使用和工作残疾福利支出的观察性研究。

An observational study of pain severity, cannabis use, and benefit expenditures in work disability.

机构信息

Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2024 Feb;115(1):157-167. doi: 10.17269/s41997-023-00821-1. Epub 2023 Oct 16.

DOI:10.17269/s41997-023-00821-1
PMID:37843785
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10853146/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study pools two cohorts of workers in Ontario interviewed 18 months following a disabling work-related injury to estimate the association between pain severity, cannabis use, and disability benefit expenditures.

METHODS

Among 1650 workers, disability benefit expenditures obtained from administrative records were combined with self-reported measures of pain symptoms and cannabis use. Disability benefit expenditures comprised wage replacement benefits and expenditures on healthcare services.

RESULTS

Past-year cannabis use was reported by 31% of participants, with approximately one third of cannabis use attributed to the treatment of conditions arising from the work-related injury. Condition-related cannabis use was elevated among the 34% of participants reporting severe pain symptoms. In regression models adjusted for age, sex, nature of injury, opioid prescription, and pre-injury chronic conditions, participants reporting condition-related cannabis use had equivalent wage replacement benefit expenditures (β = 0.254, ns) and higher healthcare benefit expenditures (β = 0.433, p = 0.012) compared to participants who did not use cannabis. Participants reporting cannabis use unrelated to conditions arising from their work-related injury had lower wage replacement benefit expenditures (β =  - 0.309, p = 0.002) and equivalent healthcare benefit expenditures (β =  - 0.251, ns) compared to participants not using cannabis.

CONCLUSION

This novel study of workers' compensation claimants interviewed at 18 months post-injury did not observe a substantial relationship between cannabis use and disability benefit expenditures, suggesting that neither harm nor significant benefit is associated with cannabis use. These findings contribute to understanding the potential benefits and risks associated with cannabis use in settings that have legalized cannabis use.

摘要

目的

本研究汇集了安大略省的两个工人队列,这些工人在与工作相关的伤害导致残疾后接受了 18 个月的采访,以评估疼痛严重程度、大麻使用与残疾福利支出之间的关联。

方法

在 1650 名工人中,将从行政记录中获得的残疾福利支出与自我报告的疼痛症状和大麻使用情况相结合。残疾福利支出包括工资替代福利和医疗保健服务支出。

结果

过去一年有 31%的参与者报告使用大麻,其中约三分之一的大麻使用是为了治疗与工作相关的伤害引起的疾病。报告严重疼痛症状的参与者中,与疾病相关的大麻使用比例较高。在调整年龄、性别、受伤性质、阿片类药物处方和受伤前慢性疾病的回归模型中,报告与疾病相关的大麻使用的参与者的工资替代福利支出相当(β=0.254,无统计学意义),医疗保健福利支出较高(β=0.433,p=0.012)与未使用大麻的参与者相比。报告与工作相关伤害引起的疾病无关的大麻使用的参与者的工资替代福利支出较低(β= -0.309,p=0.002),医疗保健福利支出与未使用大麻的参与者相当(β= -0.251,无统计学意义)。

结论

这项对工作伤害后 18 个月接受采访的工人赔偿索赔人的新研究没有观察到大麻使用与残疾福利支出之间存在实质性关系,这表明大麻使用既没有造成伤害,也没有带来显著的好处。这些发现有助于理解在合法化大麻使用的环境中与大麻使用相关的潜在益处和风险。