Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Can J Public Health. 2024 Feb;115(1):157-167. doi: 10.17269/s41997-023-00821-1. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
This study pools two cohorts of workers in Ontario interviewed 18 months following a disabling work-related injury to estimate the association between pain severity, cannabis use, and disability benefit expenditures.
Among 1650 workers, disability benefit expenditures obtained from administrative records were combined with self-reported measures of pain symptoms and cannabis use. Disability benefit expenditures comprised wage replacement benefits and expenditures on healthcare services.
Past-year cannabis use was reported by 31% of participants, with approximately one third of cannabis use attributed to the treatment of conditions arising from the work-related injury. Condition-related cannabis use was elevated among the 34% of participants reporting severe pain symptoms. In regression models adjusted for age, sex, nature of injury, opioid prescription, and pre-injury chronic conditions, participants reporting condition-related cannabis use had equivalent wage replacement benefit expenditures (β = 0.254, ns) and higher healthcare benefit expenditures (β = 0.433, p = 0.012) compared to participants who did not use cannabis. Participants reporting cannabis use unrelated to conditions arising from their work-related injury had lower wage replacement benefit expenditures (β = - 0.309, p = 0.002) and equivalent healthcare benefit expenditures (β = - 0.251, ns) compared to participants not using cannabis.
This novel study of workers' compensation claimants interviewed at 18 months post-injury did not observe a substantial relationship between cannabis use and disability benefit expenditures, suggesting that neither harm nor significant benefit is associated with cannabis use. These findings contribute to understanding the potential benefits and risks associated with cannabis use in settings that have legalized cannabis use.
本研究汇集了安大略省的两个工人队列,这些工人在与工作相关的伤害导致残疾后接受了 18 个月的采访,以评估疼痛严重程度、大麻使用与残疾福利支出之间的关联。
在 1650 名工人中,将从行政记录中获得的残疾福利支出与自我报告的疼痛症状和大麻使用情况相结合。残疾福利支出包括工资替代福利和医疗保健服务支出。
过去一年有 31%的参与者报告使用大麻,其中约三分之一的大麻使用是为了治疗与工作相关的伤害引起的疾病。报告严重疼痛症状的参与者中,与疾病相关的大麻使用比例较高。在调整年龄、性别、受伤性质、阿片类药物处方和受伤前慢性疾病的回归模型中,报告与疾病相关的大麻使用的参与者的工资替代福利支出相当(β=0.254,无统计学意义),医疗保健福利支出较高(β=0.433,p=0.012)与未使用大麻的参与者相比。报告与工作相关伤害引起的疾病无关的大麻使用的参与者的工资替代福利支出较低(β= -0.309,p=0.002),医疗保健福利支出与未使用大麻的参与者相当(β= -0.251,无统计学意义)。
这项对工作伤害后 18 个月接受采访的工人赔偿索赔人的新研究没有观察到大麻使用与残疾福利支出之间存在实质性关系,这表明大麻使用既没有造成伤害,也没有带来显著的好处。这些发现有助于理解在合法化大麻使用的环境中与大麻使用相关的潜在益处和风险。