Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, Texas; Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; Temple University Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Nov 15;207:470-478. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.08.065. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
Intracoronary imaging has become an important tool in the treatment of complex lesions with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This retrospective cohort study identified 1,118,475 patients with PCI from the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2017 to 2019. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were identified with appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events. The secondary outcomes include net adverse clinical events (NACEs), all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI) readmission, admission for stroke, and emergency revascularization. The multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression was used to adjust for demographic and co-morbid confounders. Of 1,118,475 PCIs, 86,140 (7.7%) used IVUS guidance and 5,617 (0.5%) used OCT guidance. The median follow-up time was 184 days. The primary outcome of major adverse cardiac events was significantly lower for the IVUS (6.5% vs 7.6%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86 to 0.91, p <0.001) and OCT (4.4% vs 7.6%; HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.79, p <0.001) groups. IVUS was associated with significantly lower rates of NACEs (8.4% vs 9.4%; HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.94, p <0.001), all-cause mortality (3.5% vs 4.3%; HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.88, p <0.001), readmission for MI (2.7% vs 3.0%; HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.99, p = 0.012), and admission for stroke (0.5% vs 0.6%; HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.95, p = 0.002). OCT was associated with significantly lower rates of NACEs (6.6% vs 9.4%; HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.89, p <0.001) and all-cause mortality (1.8% vs 4.3%; HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.63, p <0.001). Emergency revascularization was not significantly different with IVUS guidance. Readmission for MI, stroke, and emergency revascularization were not significantly different with OCT guidance. A subgroup analysis of patients with ST-elevation MI and non-ST-elevation MI showed similar results. In conclusion, the use of IVUS and OCT guidance with PCI were associated with significantly lower rates of morbidity and mortality in real-world practice.
冠状动脉内影像学已成为经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中治疗复杂病变的重要工具。本回顾性队列研究从 2017 年至 2019 年的全国再入院数据库中确定了 1,118,475 例接受 PCI 的患者。血管内超声(IVUS)和光相干断层扫描(OCT)通过适当的国际疾病分类第十版代码来识别。主要结局是主要不良心脏事件。次要结局包括净不良临床事件(NACEs)、全因死亡率、心肌梗死(MI)再入院、因中风入院和紧急血运重建。使用多变量 Cox 比例风险回归调整人口统计学和合并症混杂因素。在 1,118,475 例 PCI 中,86,140 例(7.7%)使用 IVUS 指导,5,617 例(0.5%)使用 OCT 指导。中位随访时间为 184 天。主要不良心脏事件的结局是 IVUS 组(6.5% vs 7.6%;风险比 [HR] 0.89,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.86 至 0.91,p <0.001)和 OCT 组(4.4% vs 7.6%;HR 0.69,95% CI 0.61 至 0.79,p <0.001)显著降低。IVUS 与 NACEs 发生率显著降低相关(8.4% vs 9.4%;HR 0.92,95% CI 0.89 至 0.94,p <0.001),全因死亡率(3.5% vs 4.3%;HR 0.85,95% CI 0.82 至 0.88,p <0.001),MI 再入院(2.7% vs 3.0%;HR 0.95,95% CI 0.91 至 0.99,p = 0.012)和中风入院(0.5% vs 0.6%;HR 0.86,95% CI 0.78 至 0.95,p = 0.002)。OCT 与 NACEs 发生率显著降低相关(6.6% vs 9.4%;HR 0.81,95% CI 0.73 至 0.89,p <0.001)和全因死亡率(1.8% vs 4.3%;HR 0.51,95% CI 0.42 至 0.63,p <0.001)相关。IVUS 指导下紧急血运重建的发生率没有显著差异。OCT 指导下 MI、中风和紧急血运重建的再入院率没有显著差异。ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的亚组分析显示了类似的结果。总之,在真实世界的实践中,使用 IVUS 和 OCT 指导 PCI 与发病率和死亡率的显著降低相关。