United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States of America; Pegasus Technical Services, Inc., 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States of America.
Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, UCB 428, Boulder, CO 80309, United States of America; Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jan 10;907:167781. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167781. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
Infections of Legionnaires' disease in the United States caused by Legionella have increased ninefold between the years 2000-2018. Legionella harbored in biofilms or inside amoeba within premise plumbing can be more resistant to disinfectants, thus causing treatment challenges. Ultraviolet-light emitting diodes (UV-LEDs) are an emerging water disinfection technology with several advantages over conventional UV lamps. In this study, we evaluated the effects of UV-LEDs (255, 265, and 285 nm), a low-pressure (LP) mercury UV lamp (254 nm), and a bandpass filtered medium-pressure (MP) mercury UV lamp (220 nm) on properties and inactivation of three strains of L. pneumophila serogroup 1. The UV-LEDs emitting at 255 and 265 nm showed greater inactivation performance against all the strains compared to the UV-LED at 285 nm and the LP UV lamp at 254 nm. Our results showed that strains of the same serogroup exhibited different UV sensitivities. Analyses of DNA and protein damage revealed that UV exposure using 254, 255, and 265 nm predominantly causes DNA damage, while protein damage is predominant at 220 nm. Both DNA and protein damage were observed at 285 nm, but the extent of DNA damage was relatively less significant compared to the other wavelengths. Electric energy consumption analysis showed that water treatment using UV-LEDs is currently unsatisfactory compared to conventional LP UV lamps due to the mediocre wall plug efficiency (WPE) of UV-LEDs. However, recent studies indicate that the WPE of UV-LEDs is continuously improving. Overall, our study highlights that UV-LEDs are a promising technology for inactivating waterborne pathogens and have the potential to replace existing UV mercury lamps for water disinfection applications.
在美国,2000 年至 2018 年间,军团病的军团菌感染增加了 9 倍。生物膜或原生动物内的军团菌更能抵抗消毒剂,从而导致治疗挑战。紫外线发光二极管(UV-LED)是一种新兴的水消毒技术,与传统的紫外线灯相比具有多项优势。在这项研究中,我们评估了 UV-LED(255、265 和 285nm)、低压(LP)汞紫外线灯(254nm)和带通过滤中压(MP)汞紫外线灯(220nm)对三种血清群 1 嗜肺军团菌菌株特性和失活的影响。与 285nm 的 UV-LED 和 254nm 的 LP UV 灯相比,发射 255nm 和 265nm 的 UV-LED 对所有菌株的灭活性能表现出更大的优势。我们的结果表明,同一血清群的菌株表现出不同的紫外线敏感性。DNA 和蛋白质损伤分析表明,使用 254、255 和 265nm 进行紫外线照射主要导致 DNA 损伤,而在 220nm 时主要导致蛋白质损伤。在 285nm 时观察到 DNA 和蛋白质损伤,但与其他波长相比,DNA 损伤的程度相对较小。电能消耗分析表明,由于 UV-LED 的壁插效率(WPE)较差,与传统的 LP UV 灯相比,目前使用 UV-LED 进行水处理并不令人满意。然而,最近的研究表明,UV-LED 的 WPE 正在不断提高。总的来说,我们的研究表明,UV-LED 是一种很有前途的灭活水传播病原体的技术,并且有可能取代现有的 UV 汞灯用于水消毒应用。