Suppr超能文献

高级助产实践:范围综述。

Advanced midwifery practice: A scoping review.

机构信息

School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

WA Country Health Service, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Women Birth. 2024 Feb;37(1):106-117. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.10.001. Epub 2023 Oct 14.

Abstract

PROBLEM

There is no international standard for advanced midwifery scope of practice.

BACKGROUND

Globally, there is variance in how scope of midwifery practice is determined and regulated, with no consensus on extended or advanced scope. This can lead to under-utilised staff potential, un-met consumer need, and loss of professional skill.

AIMS

The aim of this scoping review was to synthesise and map what is reported in the international literature on the advanced scope of midwifery practice.

METHODS

A systematic scoping review methodology was adopted utilising Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A full search was conducted of databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Google. Publications from 2019 to August 2022 that met criteria were included. Reported skills were mapped to the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) competencies of pre-conception, antenatal, labour and birth, postnatal plus globally identified areas for midwifery investment.

FINDINGS

28 articles met inclusion criteria. Reported skills included abortion care (n = 6), prescribing (n = 7), ultrasound (n = 2), advanced practice skills (n = 7), midwifery-led skills, primary health, post-graduate education, HIV/AIDS testing, advocacy, and acupressure (all n = 1).

DISCUSSION

This review presents a synopsis of publications describing what has been defined as advanced midwifery scope of practice in international contexts.

CONCLUSION

Establishing evidence of midwives working to the peak of professional scope is important to continue to develop professional capacity and support contemporary practice, regulation, governance, and policy while improving consumer access to equitable care. Findings aid service development, provision, and professional planning.

摘要

问题

没有国际公认的高级助产实践范围标准。

背景

在全球范围内,助产实践范围的确定和监管方式存在差异,对于扩展或高级范围没有共识。这可能导致人员潜力未得到充分利用、消费者需求未得到满足以及专业技能流失。

目的

本范围综述的目的是综合并绘制国际文献中关于高级助产实践范围的报告。

方法

采用系统范围综述方法,利用系统综述和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)。对包括 MEDLINE、CINAHL、Scopus 和 Google 在内的数据库进行了全面搜索。纳入符合标准的 2019 年至 2022 年 8 月期间发表的出版物。将报告的技能映射到国际助产士联盟(ICM)的孕前、产前、分娩和产后以及全球确定的助产投资领域的能力。

结果

28 篇文章符合纳入标准。报告的技能包括堕胎护理(n=6)、处方(n=7)、超声(n=2)、高级实践技能(n=7)、助产主导技能、初级卫生保健、研究生教育、艾滋病毒/艾滋病检测、宣传和指压按摩(均 n=1)。

讨论

本综述介绍了描述国际背景下高级助产实践范围的出版物摘要。

结论

确定助产士在专业范围内的最高水平工作的证据对于继续发展专业能力和支持当代实践、监管、治理和政策,同时改善消费者获得公平护理至关重要。研究结果有助于服务的开发、提供和专业规划。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验