• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Minimal important difference metrics and test-retest reliability of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 with a primary care sample.创伤后应激障碍检查表 DSM-5 用于初级保健样本的最小重要差异指标和测试-重测信度。
J Trauma Stress. 2023 Dec;36(6):1102-1114. doi: 10.1002/jts.22975. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
2
An Empirical Crosswalk for the PTSD Checklist: Translating DSM-IV to DSM-5 Using a Veteran Sample.创伤后应激障碍检查表的实证转换:使用退伍军人样本从 DSM-IV 到 DSM-5 的翻译。
J Trauma Stress. 2019 Oct;32(5):799-805. doi: 10.1002/jts.22438.
3
A diagnostic questionnaire for childbirth related posttraumatic stress disorder: a validation study.分娩相关创伤后应激障碍的诊断问卷:一项验证研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jul;231(1):134.e1-134.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.11.1229. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
4
Posttraumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5: Psychometric properties in a Japanese population.创伤后应激障碍检查表 DSM-5:日本人群中的心理测量特性。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Mar 15;247:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.086. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
5
Operating characteristics of the PTSD checklist in a military primary care setting.创伤后应激障碍检查表在军事初级保健环境中的操作特征。
Psychol Assess. 2013 Sep;25(3):1032-6. doi: 10.1037/a0033325.
6
The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5):编制与初步心理测量评估
J Trauma Stress. 2015 Dec;28(6):489-98. doi: 10.1002/jts.22059. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
7
Comparison of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Instruments From Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition vs Fifth Edition in a Large Cohort of US Military Service Members and Veterans.《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版与第五版创伤后应激障碍检查表在美军和退伍军人大型队列中的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e218072. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8072.
8
Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 in a sample of trauma exposed mental health service users.创伤后应激障碍检查表 DSM-5 在暴露于创伤的心理健康服务使用者样本中的心理测量特性。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Jan 26;12(1):1863578. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1863578. eCollection 2021.
9
Validity of the posttraumatic stress disorders (PTSD) checklist in pregnant women.创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)检查表在孕妇中的有效性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 May 12;17(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1304-4.
10
Psychometric analysis of the PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) among treatment-seeking military service members.寻求治疗的军人中创伤后应激障碍检查表-5(PCL-5)的心理测量分析。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Nov;28(11):1392-1403. doi: 10.1037/pas0000260. Epub 2016 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of an eye movement desensitization and reprocessing intervention for the prevention of post- traumatic symptoms in perinatal loss: a randomized pilot controlled trial.眼动脱敏与再加工干预对预防围产期丧亲创伤后症状的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 9;16:1593306. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1593306. eCollection 2025.
2
Feasibility and acceptability of written exposure therapy group in a virtual outpatient setting.虚拟门诊环境下书面暴露疗法小组的可行性与可接受性
J Trauma Stress. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1002/jts.23175.
3
A pilot study of an online group-based Internal Family Systems intervention for comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and substance use.一项针对创伤后应激障碍与物质使用共病患者的基于网络小组的内在家庭系统干预的试点研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 27;16:1544435. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1544435. eCollection 2025.
4
Examining why therapists add sessions to the written exposure therapy protocol and whether it improves treatment outcome: A mixed-methods analysis.探究治疗师为何在书面暴露疗法方案中增加疗程以及这是否能改善治疗效果:一项混合方法分析。
Psychol Serv. 2025 Mar 20. doi: 10.1037/ser0000954.
5
Associations among sleep quality, cognitive processing therapy, and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in a primary care setting.基层医疗环境中睡眠质量、认知加工疗法与创伤后应激障碍症状之间的关联。
J Trauma Stress. 2025 Jun;38(3):376-386. doi: 10.1002/jts.23132. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
6
Enhancing resiliency and optimizing readiness in military personnel through psychological flexibility training: design and methodology of a randomized controlled trial.通过心理灵活性训练增强军事人员的复原力并优化战备状态:一项随机对照试验的设计与方法
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 5;14:1299532. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1299532. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-5: A Systematic Review of Existing Psychometric Evidence.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍检查表:对现有心理测量证据的系统评价
Clin Psychol (New York). 2023 Mar;30(1):110-121. doi: 10.1037/cps0000111. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
2
Sudden Gains in Two Trauma-Focused Treatments for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.创伤后应激障碍两种聚焦创伤治疗方法的迅速收效。
Behav Ther. 2022 Mar;53(2):255-266. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
3
Adapting the multilevel model for estimation of the reliable change index (RCI) with multiple timepoints and multiple sources of error.适应多水平模型,用于估计具有多个时间点和多个误差源的可靠变化指数(RCI)。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2022 Jun;31(2):e1906. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1906. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
4
Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 in a sample of trauma exposed mental health service users.创伤后应激障碍检查表 DSM-5 在暴露于创伤的心理健康服务使用者样本中的心理测量特性。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Jan 26;12(1):1863578. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1863578. eCollection 2021.
5
Reliable and clinically significant change in the clinician-administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 and PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 among male veterans.男性退伍军人的 DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍量表和 DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍检查表中的临床医生管理 PTSD 量表具有可靠且有临床意义的变化。
Psychol Assess. 2022 Feb;34(2):197-203. doi: 10.1037/pas0001098. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
6
A systematic survey identified methodological issues in studies estimating anchor-based minimal important differences in patient-reported outcomes.一项系统调查确定了在估计基于锚定的患者报告结局最小有意义差异的研究中存在方法学问题。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Feb;142:144-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.10.028. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
7
Comparison of Teleintegrated Care and Telereferral Care for Treating Complex Psychiatric Disorders in Primary Care: A Pragmatic Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial.远程整合护理与远程转介护理治疗初级保健中复杂精神障碍的比较:一项实用随机对照有效性试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 1;78(11):1189-1199. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.2318.
8
Between-group minimally important change versus individual treatment responders.组间最小重要变化与个体治疗反应者。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Oct;30(10):2765-2772. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02897-z. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
9
The "3 Es" of trauma-informed care in a federally qualified health center: Traumatic Event- and Experience-related predictors of physical and mental health Effects among female patients.创伤知情护理的“3E”:联邦合格健康中心中女性患者的身体和心理健康影响的创伤事件和相关经历预测因素。
J Community Psychol. 2021 Mar;49(2):703-724. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22488. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
10
Study to promote innovation in rural integrated telepsychiatry (SPIRIT): Rationale and design of a randomized comparative effectiveness trial of managing complex psychiatric disorders in rural primary care clinics.研究促进农村综合远程精神病学创新(SPIRIT):在农村初级保健诊所管理复杂精神疾病的随机对照效果试验的原理和设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Mar;90:105873. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105873. Epub 2019 Oct 31.

创伤后应激障碍检查表 DSM-5 用于初级保健样本的最小重要差异指标和测试-重测信度。

Minimal important difference metrics and test-retest reliability of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 with a primary care sample.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.

VA Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma Stress. 2023 Dec;36(6):1102-1114. doi: 10.1002/jts.22975. Epub 2023 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1002/jts.22975
PMID:37845820
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10754254/
Abstract

The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) is a measure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom severity that is widely used for clinical and research purposes. Although previous work has examined metrics of minimal important difference (MID) of the PCL-5 in veteran samples, no work has identified PCL-5 MID metrics among adults in primary care in the United States. In this secondary analysis, data were evaluated from primary care patients (N = 971) who screened positive for PTSD and participated in a large clinical trial in federally qualified health centers in three U.S. states. Participants primarily self-identified as women (70.2%) and White (70.3%). We calculated test-retest reliability using clinic registry data and multiple distribution- and anchor-based metrics of MID using baseline and follow-up survey data. Test-retest reliability (Pearson's r, Spearman's ρ, intraclass correlation coefficient) ranged from adequate to excellent (.79-.94), with the shortest time lag demonstrating the highest reliability estimate. The MID for the PCL-5 was estimated using multiple approaches. Distribution-based approaches indicated an MID range of 8.5-12.5, and anchor-based approaches indicated an MID range of 9.8-11.7. Taken together, the MID metrics indicate that PCL-5 change scores of 9-12 likely reflect real change in PTSD symptoms and indicate at least an MID for patients, whereas PCL-5 change scores of 5 or less likely are not reliable. These findings can help inform clinicians using the PCL-5 in similar populations to track patient responses to treatment and help researchers interpret PCL-5 score changes in clinical trials.

摘要

创伤后应激障碍检查表第五版(PCL-5)是一种广泛用于临床和研究目的的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状严重程度的测量工具。尽管之前的工作已经研究了退伍军人样本中 PCL-5 的最小有意义差异(MID)的指标,但没有工作在全美初级保健中的成年人中确定 PCL-5 的 MID 指标。在这项二次分析中,数据来自于在三个美国州的联邦合格健康中心参加大型临床试验的筛查出 PTSD 阳性的初级保健患者(N=971)。参与者主要是女性(70.2%)和白人(70.3%)。我们使用诊所登记数据计算了测试-重测信度,并使用基线和随访调查数据使用多种分布和基于锚定的 MID 指标进行了计算。测试-重测信度(Pearson r、Spearman ρ、组内相关系数)从适度到优秀不等(.79-.94),最短时间滞后的信度估计值最高。使用多种方法估计了 PCL-5 的 MID。基于分布的方法表明 MID 范围为 8.5-12.5,基于锚定的方法表明 MID 范围为 9.8-11.7。综上所述,MID 指标表明 PCL-5 的变化分数在 9-12 可能反映了 PTSD 症状的真实变化,表明患者至少有一个 MID,而 PCL-5 的变化分数为 5 或更低可能不可靠。这些发现可以帮助在类似人群中使用 PCL-5 的临床医生跟踪患者对治疗的反应,并帮助研究人员在临床试验中解释 PCL-5 评分的变化。