Department of Cardiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Dec;34(12):2545-2551. doi: 10.1111/jce.16095. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
The use of flecainide and propafenone for medical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter/intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) is well-described in adults without congenital heart disease (CHD). Data are sparse regarding their use for the same purpose in adults with CHD and in adolescent patients with anatomically normal hearts and we sought to describe the use of class IC drugs in this population and identify factors associated with decreased likelihood of success.
Single center retrospective cohort study of patients who received oral flecainide or propafenone for medical cardioversion of AF or IART from 2000 to 2022. The unit of analysis was each episode of AF/IART. We performed a time-to-sinus rhythm analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model clustering on the patient to identify factors associated with increased likelihood of success.
We identified 45 episodes involving 41 patients. As only episodes of AF were successfully cardioverted with medical therapy, episodes of IART were excluded from our analyses. Use of flecainide was the only factor associated with increased likelihood of success. There was a statistically insignificant trend toward decreased likelihood of success in patients with CHD.
Flecainide was more effective than propafenone. We did not detect a difference in rate of conversion to sinus rhythm between patients with and without CHD and were likely underpowered to do so, however, there was a trend toward decreased likelihood of success in patients with CHD. That said, medical therapy was effective in >50% of patients with CHD with AF.
氟卡尼和普罗帕酮在成人非先天性心脏病(CHD)患者中用于房颤(AF)和房扑/房内折返性心动过速(IART)的医学转复已得到充分描述。关于这些药物在成人 CHD 患者和解剖正常心脏的青少年患者中用于相同目的的数据很少,我们试图描述该人群中 IC 类药物的使用情况,并确定与成功率降低相关的因素。
对 2000 年至 2022 年期间接受氟卡尼或普罗帕酮口服药物治疗 AF 或 IART 医学转复的患者进行单中心回顾性队列研究。分析单位为每个 AF/IART 发作。我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型对患者进行聚类进行窦性节律分析,以确定与成功率增加相关的因素。
我们确定了 45 个涉及 41 名患者的发作。由于只有 AF 发作通过药物治疗成功转复为窦性节律,因此将 IART 发作排除在我们的分析之外。氟卡尼的使用是与成功率增加相关的唯一因素。在 CHD 患者中,成功率降低的趋势具有统计学意义。
氟卡尼比普罗帕酮更有效。我们没有发现 CHD 患者与非 CHD 患者之间窦性节律转换率的差异,而且可能没有足够的能力来发现这种差异,但 CHD 患者的成功率降低趋势。也就是说,医学治疗在>50%的 CHD 合并 AF 患者中有效。