[Effectiveness and side effects of the treatment with propafenone and flecainide for recent-onset atrial fibrillation].

BACKGROUND

The authors report their experience in recent-onset atrial fibrillation treated with intravenous flecainide and propafenone, in comparison with the placebo group.

METHODS

We randomized 352 (138 in the flecainide group, 164 in the propafenone group and 50 in the control group) consecutive patients (167 males, 185 females, mean age 59 +/- 12 years) with recent-onset atrial fibrillation. The electrocardiogram of all patients was monitored for at least 24 hours.

RESULTS

The restoration of sinus rhythm occurred in 72.5, 80.4, 86.2 and 89.8% of patients in the flecainide group; in 54.3, 68.3, 75 and 92.1% in the propafenone group; in 22.2, 27.8, 35.2 and 46.3% in the control group, at 1, 3, 6 and 24 hours respectively. The occurrence of side effects was the same in all treatment groups, and occurred in about 10% of patients in the flecainide and propafenone groups, and in 4% in the control group. In our study population the treatment of recent-onset atrial fibrillation with flecainide was faster in converting the arrhythmia to sinus rhythm (p < 0.005 at 1 hour, p < 0.05 at 3 hours, p = 0.05 at 6 hours). However within 24 hours the efficacy of either flecainide or propafenone was the same (p = NS at 24 hours).

CONCLUSIONS

Side effects were similar in both treatment groups. In particular malignant arrhythmias did not occur in the treatment groups and in the control group.