Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024 Mar;76(3):363-376. doi: 10.1002/art.42730. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
We investigated methotrexate safety and the influence of dose on efficacy outcomes in combination with three different biologic treatments and with active conventional treatment (ACT) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
This post hoc analysis included 812 treatment-naïve patients with early RA who were randomized (1:1:1:1) in the NORD-STAR trial to receive methotrexate in combination with ACT, certolizumab-pegol, abatacept, or tocilizumab. Methotrexate safety, doses, and dose effects on Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission were assessed after 24 weeks of treatment.
Compared with ACT, the prevalence of methotrexate-associated side effects was higher when methotrexate was combined with tocilizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-1.84) but not with certolizumab-pegol (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.79-1.23) or with abatacept (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.75-1.16). With ACT as the reference, the methotrexate dose was significantly lower when used in combination with tocilizumab (β -4.65, 95% CI -5.83 to -3.46; P < 0.001) or abatacept (β -1.15, 95% CI -2.27 to -0.03; P = 0.04), and it was numerically lower in combination with certolizumab-pegol (β -1.07, 95% CI -2.21 to 0.07; P = 0.07). Methotrexate dose reductions were not associated with decreased CDAI remission rates within any of the treatment combinations.
Methotrexate was generally well tolerated in combination therapies, but adverse events were a limiting factor in receiving the target dose of 25 mg/wk, and these were more frequent in combination with tocilizumab versus ACT. On the other hand, methotrexate dose reductions were not associated with decreased CDAI remission rates within any of the four treatment combinations at 24 weeks.
我们研究了甲氨蝶呤在联合三种不同的生物制剂治疗及与活性常规治疗(ACT)治疗早期类风湿关节炎(RA)时的安全性和剂量对疗效结局的影响。
本事后分析纳入了 NORD-STAR 试验中 812 例接受早期 RA 治疗的初治患者,他们按 1:1:1:1 的比例随机分配,分别接受甲氨蝶呤联合 ACT、培塞利珠单抗、阿巴西普或托珠单抗治疗。在治疗 24 周后评估了甲氨蝶呤安全性、剂量以及对临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)缓解的剂量效应。
与 ACT 相比,甲氨蝶呤联合托珠单抗时发生甲氨蝶呤相关不良反应的发生率高于 ACT(风险比 [HR] 1.48,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.20-1.84),但与培塞利珠单抗(HR 0.99,95% CI 0.79-1.23)或阿巴西普(HR 0.93,95% CI 0.75-1.16)联合治疗时无显著差异。以 ACT 为参照,与托珠单抗(β -4.65,95% CI -5.83 至 -3.46;P < 0.001)或阿巴西普(β -1.15,95% CI -2.27 至 -0.03;P = 0.04)联合使用时,甲氨蝶呤剂量显著降低,与培塞利珠单抗联合使用时则呈数值降低(β -1.07,95% CI -2.21 至 0.07;P = 0.07)。在任何联合治疗中,甲氨蝶呤剂量的降低与 CDAI 缓解率的降低无关。
甲氨蝶呤在联合治疗中通常具有良好的耐受性,但不良反应是限制每周 25 mg 目标剂量的一个因素,且与 ACT 相比,联合托珠单抗时更常见。另一方面,在 24 周时,在任何四种治疗组合中,甲氨蝶呤剂量的降低与 CDAI 缓解率的降低无关。