侵袭性传统疗法与三种生物疗法的头对头比较以及治疗有反应患者的两种降阶梯策略的比较:一项多中心、随机、开放标签、盲法评估的4期研究方案
Head-to-head comparison of aggressive conventional therapy and three biological treatments and comparison of two de-escalation strategies in patients who respond to treatment: study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded-assessor, phase 4 study.
作者信息
Glinatsi Daniel, Heiberg Marte S, Rudin Anna, Nordström Dan, Haavardsholm Espen A, Gudbjornsson Bjorn, Østergaard Mikkel, Uhlig Till, Grondal Gerdur, Hørslev-Petersen Kim, van Vollenhoven Ronald, Hetland Merete L
机构信息
Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Nordre Ringvej 57, DK-2600, Glostrup, Denmark.
Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Box 23 Vinderen, 0219, Oslo, Norway.
出版信息
Trials. 2017 Apr 4;18(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1891-x.
BACKGROUND
New targeted therapies and improved treatment strategies have dramatically improved the outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, it is unknown whether different early aggressive interventions can induce stable remission or a low-active disease state that can be maintained with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) therapy, and whether they differ in efficacy and safety. The Nordic Rheumatic Diseases Strategy Trials And Registries (NORD-STAR) study will assess and compare (1) the proportion of patients who achieve remission in a head-to-head comparison between csDMARD plus glucocorticoid therapy and three different biological DMARD (bDMARD) therapies with different modes of action and (2) two de-escalation strategies in patients who respond to first-line therapy.
METHODS/DESIGN: In a pragmatic, 80-160-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, assessor-blinded, phase 4 study, 800 patients with early RA (symptom duration less than 24 months) are randomized 1:1:1:1 to one of four different treatment arms: (1) aggressive csDMARD therapy with methotrexate + sulphasalazine + hydroxychloroquine + i.a. glucocorticoids (arm 1A) or methotrexate + prednisolone p.o. (arm 1B), (2) methotrexate + certolizumab-pegol, (3) methotrexate + abatacept, or (4) methotrexate + tocilizumab. The primary clinical endpoint is the proportion of patients reaching Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission at week 24. Patients in stable remission over 24 consecutive weeks enter part 2 of the study earliest after 48 weeks. Patients not achieving sustained CDAI remission over 24 consecutive weeks, exit the study after 80 weeks. In part 2, patients are re-randomized to two different de-escalation strategies, either immediate or delayed (after 24 weeks) tapering, followed by cessation of study medication. All patients remain on stable doses of methotrexate. The primary clinical endpoint in part 2 is the proportion of patients in remission (CDAI ≤2.8) 24 weeks after initiating treatment de-escalation. Radiographic assessment will be performed regularly throughout the trial, and blood and urine samples will be stored in a biobank for later biomarker analyses.
DISCUSSION
NORD-STAR is the first investigator-initiated, randomized, early RA trial to compare (1) csDMARD and three different bDMARD therapies head to head and (2) two different de-escalation strategies. The trial has the potential to identify which treatment strategy to apply in early RA to achieve the best possible outcomes for both patients and society.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
NCT01491815 and NCT02466581 . Registered on 8 December 2011 and May 2015, respectively. EudraCT: 2011-004720-35.
背景
新型靶向疗法和改良治疗策略显著改善了类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的治疗效果。然而,不同的早期积极干预措施能否诱导出可通过传统合成改善病情抗风湿药(csDMARD)治疗维持的稳定缓解或低疾病活动状态,以及它们在疗效和安全性上是否存在差异,目前尚不清楚。北欧风湿性疾病策略试验与注册研究(NORD-STAR)将评估并比较:(1)在csDMARD联合糖皮质激素治疗与三种不同作用方式的生物性改善病情抗风湿药(bDMARD)治疗的直接比较中达到缓解的患者比例;(2)一线治疗有反应的患者的两种降阶梯策略。
方法/设计:在一项为期80 - 160周、务实、多中心、随机、开放标签、评估者设盲的4期研究中,800例早期RA(症状持续时间小于24个月)患者按1:1:1:1随机分为四个不同治疗组之一:(1)甲氨蝶呤+柳氮磺胺吡啶+羟氯喹+关节内注射糖皮质激素的积极csDMARD治疗(1A组)或甲氨蝶呤+口服泼尼松龙(1B组),(2)甲氨蝶呤+赛妥珠单抗聚乙二醇,(3)甲氨蝶呤+阿巴西普,或(4)甲氨蝶呤+托珠单抗。主要临床终点是第24周达到临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)缓解的患者比例。连续24周处于稳定缓解的患者最早在48周后进入研究的第2部分。连续24周未实现持续CDAI缓解的患者在80周后退出研究。在第2部分,患者重新随机分为两种不同的降阶梯策略,即立即或延迟(24周后)逐渐减量,随后停止研究用药。所有患者继续使用稳定剂量的甲氨蝶呤。第2部分的主要临床终点是开始治疗降阶梯后24周处于缓解(CDAI≤2.8)的患者比例。在整个试验过程中定期进行影像学评估,血液和尿液样本将存储在生物样本库中以供后续生物标志物分析。
讨论
NORD-STAR是首个由研究者发起的、随机、早期RA试验,旨在直接比较(1)csDMARD与三种不同的bDMARD疗法,以及(2)两种不同的降阶梯策略。该试验有可能确定在早期RA中应用哪种治疗策略可为患者和社会带来最佳可能的结果。
试验注册
NCT01491815和NCT02466581。分别于2011年12月8日和2015年5月注册。EudraCT:2011-004720-35。
相似文献
引用本文的文献
BMC Rheumatol. 2025-4-21
本文引用的文献
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016-1
N Engl J Med. 2014-11-6
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014