Lear Luke, Inamine Hidetoshi, Shea Katriona, Buckling Angus
Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall, UK.
Department of Biology and Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ecol Lett. 2023 Dec;26(12):2056-2065. doi: 10.1111/ele.14325. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
Anthropogenic activities expose many ecosystems to multiple novel disturbances simultaneously. Despite this, how biodiversity responds to simultaneous disturbances remains unclear, with conflicting empirical results on their interactive effects. Here, we experimentally test how one disturbance (an invasive species) affects the diversity of a community over multiple levels of another disturbance regime (pulse mortality). Specifically, we invade stably coexisting bacterial communities under four different pulse frequencies, and compare their final resident diversity to uninvaded communities under the same pulse mortality regimes. Our experiment shows that the disturbances synergistically interact, such that the invader significantly reduces resident diversity at high pulse frequency, but not at low. This work therefore highlights the need to study simultaneous disturbance effects over multiple disturbance regimes as well as to carefully document unmanipulated disturbances, and may help explain the conflicting results seen in previous multiple-disturbance work.
人类活动使许多生态系统同时面临多种新出现的干扰。尽管如此,生物多样性如何应对同时发生的干扰仍不清楚,关于它们的交互作用的实证结果相互矛盾。在这里,我们通过实验测试一种干扰(入侵物种)如何在另一种干扰 regime(脉冲死亡率)的多个水平上影响群落的多样性。具体来说,我们在四种不同的脉冲频率下入侵稳定共存的细菌群落,并将它们最终的常驻多样性与在相同脉冲死亡率 regime 下未被入侵的群落进行比较。我们的实验表明,这些干扰具有协同交互作用,使得入侵者在高脉冲频率下显著降低了常驻多样性,但在低脉冲频率下则没有。因此,这项工作强调了研究多种干扰 regime 下同时发生的干扰效应以及仔细记录未受操纵的干扰的必要性,并且可能有助于解释先前多项干扰研究中出现的相互矛盾的结果。