Suppr超能文献

定制愈合基台即刻植入的种植体周围临床效果:系统评价。

Peri-implant Outcomes from Customized Healing Abutments Using Immediate Implants: A Systematic Review.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023 Oct 17;38(5):985-995. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10311.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the peri-implant outcomes of customized healing abutments (CstHA) placed on dental implants inserted in fresh tooth extraction sockets.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was registered on PROSPERO: CRD42022304320. A systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted between April 2022 and October 2022 to identify clinical studies involving immediate implant surgery associated with CstHA placement. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal and RoB2 tool were performed for the risk of bias analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies were included, most of them with low risk of bias. Four studies compared CstHA vs conventional healing abutments (CnvtHA), two compared CstHA vs cover screw and collagen matrix (CMa), and six were clinical case series. For the CstHA vs CnvtHA comparison, favorable results were observed for CstHA considering papilla maintenance and probing depth, yet the mean marginal bone level was statistically similar between CstHA and CnvtHA. CstHA showed advantages when compared to CMa for total bone volume, papilla height, and midfacial mucosa maintenance. Significantly less horizonal bone loss was reported when using CstHA compared with CMa. Horizontal and vertical bone loss was observed in a few (or no) sites in the case series using CstHA.

CONCLUSIONS

CstHA provides favorable peri-implant response because in general it does not result in a significant loss of soft and hard tissues.

摘要

目的

评估在新鲜拔牙窝中植入的种植体上使用定制愈合基台(CstHA)的种植体周围的结果。

材料与方法

该研究在 PROSPERO 上注册:CRD42022304320。在 2022 年 4 月至 2022 年 10 月期间,在 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 中进行了系统检索,以确定涉及与 CstHA 放置相关的即刻种植手术的临床研究。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所的批判性评估和 RoB2 工具进行偏倚风险分析。

结果

共纳入 12 项研究,其中大多数研究的偏倚风险较低。四项研究比较了 CstHA 与常规愈合基台(CnvtHA),两项研究比较了 CstHA 与覆盖螺丝和胶原基质(CMa),六项研究为临床病例系列。在 CstHA 与 CnvtHA 的比较中,考虑到牙乳头维持和探诊深度,CstHA 具有良好的结果,但 CstHA 和 CnvtHA 的平均边缘骨水平在统计学上相似。与 CMa 相比,CstHA 在总骨量、牙乳头高度和中面部粘膜维持方面具有优势。与 CMa 相比,使用 CstHA 时报告的水平骨丢失明显较少。在使用 CstHA 的病例系列中,很少(或没有)部位出现水平和垂直骨丢失。

结论

CstHA 提供了有利的种植体周围反应,因为它通常不会导致软组织和硬组织的显著丧失。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验