Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Optometry, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia.
Clin Exp Optom. 2024 Aug;107(6):641-648. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2023.2260805. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
Research on infantile nystagmus syndrome (INS) and visual search is limited. Conducting this research could assist practitioners in understanding how INS affects the real-life visual activities of patients and aid in developing new clinical visual function assessments for INS.
The aim of this work is to investigate how subjects with INS perform visual search tasks, and, particularly, to assess how INS subjects perform when targets are located at their null position or away from it, and when under additional cognitive demands.
INS subjects ( = 15) and controls ( = 20) performed conjunction and feature search tasks, both with and without mental arithmetic. Search performance was assessed using log-transformed total search time, gaze-dependent search time, and accuracy. Cognitive demand was quantified by pupil size and the NASA task-load index score.
INS subjects showed longer search times compared to controls in conjunction search ( < 0.01), but not in feature search. Within INS and control subjects, the total search times were significantly increased by the addition of mental arithmetic ( < 0.0001). There was no difference in gaze-dependent search times between null target position and 15° away from null target position of subjects in conjunction search ( > 0.05). Accuracies were 100% for both control and INS subjects in both conjunction and feature search.
Conjunction visual search was impaired in adult INS subjects, and further worsened under increased cognitive demand. The null position did not affect the visual search performance in INS.
关于婴儿眼球震颤综合征(INS)和视觉搜索的研究有限。开展这项研究可以帮助从业者了解 INS 如何影响患者的真实视觉活动,并有助于为 INS 开发新的临床视觉功能评估。
本研究旨在探讨 INS 患者如何执行视觉搜索任务,特别是评估当目标位于其零位置或偏离该位置时以及在额外认知需求下,INS 患者的表现如何。
INS 患者( = 15)和对照组( = 20)进行了结合搜索和特征搜索任务,同时进行了和不进行心算。使用对数变换后的总搜索时间、依赖注视的搜索时间和准确性来评估搜索性能。使用瞳孔大小和 NASA 任务负荷指数评分来量化认知需求。
与对照组相比,INS 患者在结合搜索中显示出更长的搜索时间( < 0.01),但在特征搜索中没有。在 INS 和对照组受试者中,心算的加入显著增加了总搜索时间( < 0.0001)。在结合搜索中,当目标位于零位置和偏离零位置 15°时,注视相关的搜索时间没有差异( > 0.05)。在结合搜索和特征搜索中,对照组和 INS 受试者的准确率均为 100%。
成人 INS 患者的结合视觉搜索受损,在认知需求增加的情况下进一步恶化。零位置对 INS 中的视觉搜索表现没有影响。