• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学术推广以改善阿片类药物的合理处方:一项混合方法的过程评估

Academic detailing to improve appropriate opioid prescribing: a mixed-methods process evaluation.

作者信息

Kithulegoda Natasha, Chu Cherry, Tadrous Mina, Bean Tupper, Salach Lena, Regier Loren, Bevan Lindsay, Burton Victoria, Price David, Ivers Noah, Desveaux Laura

机构信息

Women's College Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care (Kithulegoda, Chu, Tadrous, Ivers), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation (Kithulegoda, Desveaux), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Institute for Better Health (Desveaux), Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ont.; Centre for Effective Practice (Bean, Salach, Regier, Bevan, Burton, Price), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Price), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Ivers), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.

出版信息

CMAJ Open. 2023 Oct 17;11(5):E932-E941. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210050. Print 2023 Sep-Oct.

DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20210050
PMID:37848255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10586496/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Academic detailing, an educational outreach service for family physicians, was funded by the Ontario government to address gaps in opioid prescribing and pain management. We sought to evaluate the impact of academic detailing on opioid prescribing, and to understand how and why academic detailing may have influenced opioid prescribing.

METHODS

In this mixed-methods study, we collected quantitative and qualitative data concurrently from 2017 to 2019 in Ontario, Canada. We analyzed prescribing outcomes descriptively for a sample of participating physicians and compared them with a matched control group. We invited physicians to participate in qualitative interviews to discuss their experiences in academic detailing. Development and analysis of qualitative interviews was informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. We triangulated qualitative and quantitative findings to understand the mechanisms that drove changes in opioid prescribing.

RESULTS

Physicians receiving academic detailing ( = 238) achieved a greater reduction in opioid prescribing than matched controls ( = 238). Seventeen physicians completed interviews and reported that academic detailing addressed barriers to pain care, including lack of confidence, difficult interactions with patients and prescribing and tapering decisions. Academic detailing reinforced knowledge about opioid prescribing and pain management. Discussion of complex patients and talking points to use during challenging conversations were described as key drivers of practice change.

INTERPRETATION

The findings of this real-world, mixed-methods evaluation explain how an academic detailing service addressed key barriers and enablers to limit high-risk opioid prescribing in primary care. This nuanced understanding will be used to inform, spread and scale academic detailing.

摘要

背景

学术推广是一项面向家庭医生的教育外展服务,由安大略省政府资助,旨在解决阿片类药物处方和疼痛管理方面的差距。我们试图评估学术推广对阿片类药物处方的影响,并了解学术推广如何以及为何可能影响阿片类药物处方。

方法

在这项混合方法研究中,我们于2017年至2019年在加拿大安大略省同时收集了定量和定性数据。我们对参与研究的医生样本的处方结果进行了描述性分析,并将其与匹配的对照组进行了比较。我们邀请医生参与定性访谈,以讨论他们在学术推广方面的经历。定性访谈的开展和分析以理论领域框架为依据。我们对定性和定量研究结果进行三角互证,以了解推动阿片类药物处方变化的机制。

结果

接受学术推广的医生(n = 238)在阿片类药物处方减少方面比匹配的对照组(n = 238)更为显著。17名医生完成了访谈,并报告说学术推广解决了疼痛护理方面的障碍,包括缺乏信心、与患者的艰难互动以及处方和逐渐减量的决定。学术推广强化了有关阿片类药物处方和疼痛管理的知识。对复杂患者的讨论以及在具有挑战性的对话中使用的谈话要点被描述为实践改变的关键驱动因素。

解读

这项现实世界的混合方法评估结果解释了学术推广服务如何解决基层医疗中限制高风险阿片类药物处方的关键障碍和促进因素。这种细致入微的理解将用于为学术推广提供信息、传播和扩大规模。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9113/10586496/512819e9b461/cmajo.20210050f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9113/10586496/10b4ccc3e691/cmajo.20210050f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9113/10586496/76859965a93f/cmajo.20210050f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9113/10586496/8deeebaab60f/cmajo.20210050f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9113/10586496/659a391691e6/cmajo.20210050f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9113/10586496/2c657cd65eb9/cmajo.20210050f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9113/10586496/512819e9b461/cmajo.20210050f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9113/10586496/10b4ccc3e691/cmajo.20210050f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9113/10586496/76859965a93f/cmajo.20210050f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9113/10586496/8deeebaab60f/cmajo.20210050f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9113/10586496/659a391691e6/cmajo.20210050f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9113/10586496/2c657cd65eb9/cmajo.20210050f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9113/10586496/512819e9b461/cmajo.20210050f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Academic detailing to improve appropriate opioid prescribing: a mixed-methods process evaluation.学术推广以改善阿片类药物的合理处方:一项混合方法的过程评估
CMAJ Open. 2023 Oct 17;11(5):E932-E941. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210050. Print 2023 Sep-Oct.
2
Providers' perceptions on barriers and facilitators to prescribing naloxone for patients at risk for opioid overdose after implementation of a national academic detailing program: A qualitative assessment.提供者对在实施国家学术细化项目后为有阿片类药物过量风险的患者开纳洛酮处方的障碍和促进因素的看法:定性评估。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Aug;16(8):1033-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.10.015. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
3
Improving the appropriateness of antipsychotic prescribing in nursing homes: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an academic detailing intervention.提高养老院中抗精神病药物处方的合理性:一项针对学术指导干预措施的混合方法过程评估
Implement Sci. 2017 May 26;12(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0602-z.
4
Effectiveness of Audit and Feedback and Academic Detailing Interventions to Support Safer Opioid Prescribing in Primary Care.审核与反馈以及学术推广干预措施在支持基层医疗中更安全地开具阿片类药物处方方面的有效性。
Am J Med. 2025 Jan;138(1):70-78.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.09.017. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
5
Surfacing the causal assumptions and active ingredients of healthcare quality improvement interventions: An application to primary care opioid prescribing.揭示医疗质量改进干预措施的因果假设和有效成分:在初级保健阿片类药物处方中的应用。
Implement Res Pract. 2023 Nov 3;4:26334895231206569. doi: 10.1177/26334895231206569. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
6
Identification of barriers to safe opioid prescribing in primary care: a qualitative analysis of field notes collected through academic detailing.识别基层医疗中安全开具阿片类药物的障碍:对通过学术推广收集的现场记录进行定性分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Jul 30;70(697):e589-e597. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X711737. Print 2020 Aug.
7
Understanding the behavioural determinants of opioid prescribing among family physicians: a qualitative study.理解家庭医生开具阿片类药物处方的行为决定因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 May 10;20(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0947-2.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Appropriate prescribing in nursing homes demonstration project (APDP) study protocol: pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial and mixed methods process evaluation of an Ontario policy-maker initiative to improve appropriate prescribing of antipsychotics.养老院合理用药示范项目(APDP)研究方案:安大略省一项政策制定者倡议的务实、整群随机试验及混合方法过程评估,旨在改善抗精神病药物的合理使用。
Implement Sci. 2016 Mar 29;11:45. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0410-x.
10
Secondary effects of an opioid-focused academic detailing program on non-opioid controlled substance prescribing in primary care.阿片类药物为重点的学术细化方案对初级保健中非阿片类受控物质处方的次要影响。
Subst Abus. 2021;42(4):962-967. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1900989. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of an academic detailing service on benzodiazepine prescribing patterns in primary care.学术强化服务对初级保健中苯二氮䓬类药物处方模式的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 27;18(7):e0289147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289147. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
A multiple-behaviour investigation of goal prioritisation in physicians receiving audit and feedback to address high-risk prescribing in nursing homes.一项针对接受审核与反馈以解决疗养院高风险处方问题的医生目标优先级的多行为调查。
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Feb 25;1:33. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00019-3. eCollection 2020.
2
Effect of Academic Detailing on Promoting Appropriate Prescribing of Antipsychotic Medication in Nursing Homes: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.学术细化对促进养老院抗精神病药物合理处方的影响:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e205724. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5724.
3
Validating a popular outpatient antibiotic database to reliably identify high prescribing physicians for patients 65 years of age and older.
验证一个广受欢迎的门诊抗生素数据库,以可靠地识别出为 65 岁及以上患者开具大量抗生素处方的医生。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 26;14(9):e0223097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223097. eCollection 2019.
4
Association between trends in county-level opioid prescribing and reported rates of gonorrhea cases in the United States.美国县级阿片类药物处方趋势与淋病报告病例率之间的关联。
Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Aug;36:26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
5
Family Physician Perceptions of Their Role in Managing the Opioid Crisis.家庭医生对其在管理阿片类药物危机中角色的认知。
Ann Fam Med. 2019 Jul;17(4):345-351. doi: 10.1370/afm.2413.
6
Understanding the behavioural determinants of opioid prescribing among family physicians: a qualitative study.理解家庭医生开具阿片类药物处方的行为决定因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 May 10;20(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0947-2.
7
Regional variability in outpatient antibiotic use in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective cross-sectional study.加拿大安大略省门诊抗生素使用的区域差异:一项回顾性横断面研究。
CMAJ Open. 2018 Oct 31;6(4):E445-E452. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180017. Print 2018 Oct-Dec.
8
Measuring the Burden of Opioid-related Mortality in Ontario, Canada.衡量加拿大安大略省阿片类药物相关死亡率的负担
J Addict Med. 2018 Sep/Oct;12(5):418-419. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000412.
9
Physicians report adopting safer opioid prescribing behaviors after academic detailing intervention.医生报告称,在接受了学术强化干预后,他们采用了更安全的阿片类药物处方行为。
Subst Abus. 2018;39(2):218-224. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2018.1449175. Epub 2018 May 4.
10
Barriers to Using Nonpharmacologic Approaches and Reducing Opioid Use in Primary Care.在初级保健中使用非药物方法和减少阿片类药物使用的障碍。
Pain Med. 2018 Jul 1;19(7):1357-1364. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx220.