• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对接受审核与反馈以解决疗养院高风险处方问题的医生目标优先级的多行为调查。

A multiple-behaviour investigation of goal prioritisation in physicians receiving audit and feedback to address high-risk prescribing in nursing homes.

作者信息

McCleary Nicola, Desveaux Laura, Reis Catherine, Linklater Stefanie, Witteman Holly O, Taljaard Monica, Thavorn Kednapa, Grimshaw Jeremy M, Ivers Noah M, Presseau Justin

机构信息

Centre for Implementation Research, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital - General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Room L1202, Box 711, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6 Canada.

School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Feb 25;1:33. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00019-3. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1186/s43058-020-00019-3
PMID:32885191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7427855/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As part of their professional role, healthcare providers enact multiple competing goal-directed behaviours in time-constrained environments. Better understanding healthcare providers' motivation to engage in the pursuit of particular goals may help inform the development of implementation interventions. We investigated healthcare providers' pursuit of multiple goals as part of a trial evaluating the effectiveness of an audit and feedback intervention in supporting appropriate adjustment of high-risk medication prescribing by physicians working in nursing homes. Our objectives were to determine whether goal priority and constructs from Social Cognitive Theory (self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and descriptive norms) predicted intention to adjust prescribing of multiple high-risk medications and to investigate how physicians in nursing homes prioritise their goals related to high-risk medication prescribing.

METHODS

Physicians in Ontario, Canada, who signed up for and accessed the audit and feedback report were invited to complete a questionnaire assessing goal priority, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, descriptive norms, and intention in relation to the three targeted behaviours (adjusting prescribing of antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, and antidepressants) and a control behaviour (adjusting statin prescribing). We conducted multiple linear regression analyses to identify predictors of intention. We also conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews to investigate how physicians in nursing homes prioritise their goals in relation to appropriately adjusting prescribing of the medications included in the report: analysis was informed by the framework analysis method.

RESULTS

Thirty-three of 89 (37%) physicians completed the questionnaire. Goal priority was the only significant predictor of intention for each medication type; the greater a priority it was for physicians to appropriately adjust their prescribing, the stronger was their intention to do so. Across five interviews, physicians reported prioritising adjustment of antipsychotic prescribing specifically. This was influenced by negative media coverage of antipsychotic prescribing in nursing homes, the provincial government's mandate to address antipsychotic prescribing, and by the deprescribing initiatives or best practice routines in place in their nursing homes.

CONCLUSIONS

Goal priority predicted nursing home physicians' intention to adjust prescribing. Targeting goal priority through implementation interventions therefore has the potential to influence behaviour via increased motivation. Implementation intervention developers should consider the external factors that may drive physicians' prioritization.

摘要

背景

作为其职业角色的一部分,医疗保健提供者在时间紧迫的环境中会表现出多种相互竞争的目标导向行为。更好地理解医疗保健提供者追求特定目标的动机可能有助于为实施干预措施的制定提供信息。作为一项试验的一部分,我们调查了医疗保健提供者对多个目标的追求,该试验旨在评估审核与反馈干预措施在支持疗养院医生适当调整高风险药物处方方面的有效性。我们的目标是确定目标优先级以及社会认知理论中的构念(自我效能感、结果期望和描述性规范)是否能预测调整多种高风险药物处方的意图,并调查疗养院医生如何对与高风险药物处方相关的目标进行优先级排序。

方法

邀请加拿大安大略省报名并查阅审核与反馈报告的医生填写一份问卷,评估目标优先级、自我效能感、结果期望、描述性规范以及与三种目标行为(调整抗精神病药物、苯二氮䓬类药物和抗抑郁药物的处方)和一种对照行为(调整他汀类药物的处方)相关的意图。我们进行了多元线性回归分析以确定意图的预测因素。我们还进行了半结构化定性访谈,以调查疗养院医生如何对与适当调整报告中所列药物处方相关的目标进行优先级排序:分析采用框架分析法。

结果

89名医生中有33名(37%)完成了问卷。目标优先级是每种药物类型意图的唯一显著预测因素;对医生来说,适当调整处方的优先级越高,他们这样做的意图就越强。在五次访谈中,医生们报告说特别优先考虑调整抗精神病药物的处方。这受到疗养院抗精神病药物处方的负面媒体报道、省政府解决抗精神病药物处方问题的指令以及他们所在疗养院的减药举措或最佳实践惯例的影响。

结论

目标优先级预测了疗养院医生调整处方的意图。因此,通过实施干预措施针对目标优先级有可能通过增强动机来影响行为。实施干预措施的开发者应考虑可能推动医生进行优先级排序的外部因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fc0/7427855/a6307871ce83/43058_2020_19_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fc0/7427855/a6307871ce83/43058_2020_19_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fc0/7427855/a6307871ce83/43058_2020_19_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A multiple-behaviour investigation of goal prioritisation in physicians receiving audit and feedback to address high-risk prescribing in nursing homes.一项针对接受审核与反馈以解决疗养院高风险处方问题的医生目标优先级的多行为调查。
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Feb 25;1:33. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00019-3. eCollection 2020.
2
Effectiveness of confidential reports to physicians on their prescribing of antipsychotic medications in nursing homes.向医生提供关于其在养老院开具抗精神病药物处方的保密报告的有效性。
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Feb 25;1:30. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00013-9. eCollection 2020.
3
Testing feedback message framing and comparators to address prescribing of high-risk medications in nursing homes: protocol for a pragmatic, factorial, cluster-randomized trial.测试反馈信息框架和对照物以解决养老院中高危药物的处方问题:一项实用、析因、整群随机试验的方案。
Implement Sci. 2017 Jul 14;12(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0615-7.
4
Improving antibiotic initiation and duration prescribing among nursing home physicians using an audit and feedback intervention: a theory-informed qualitative analysis.利用审核反馈干预措施改进养老院医生的抗生素起始和持续处方:基于理论的定性分析。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Feb;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001088.
5
Appropriate prescribing in nursing homes demonstration project (APDP) study protocol: pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial and mixed methods process evaluation of an Ontario policy-maker initiative to improve appropriate prescribing of antipsychotics.养老院合理用药示范项目(APDP)研究方案:安大略省一项政策制定者倡议的务实、整群随机试验及混合方法过程评估,旨在改善抗精神病药物的合理使用。
Implement Sci. 2016 Mar 29;11:45. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0410-x.
6
Improving the appropriateness of antipsychotic prescribing in nursing homes: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an academic detailing intervention.提高养老院中抗精神病药物处方的合理性:一项针对学术指导干预措施的混合方法过程评估
Implement Sci. 2017 May 26;12(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0602-z.
7
Engagement is a necessary condition to test audit and feedback design features: results of a pragmatic, factorial, cluster-randomized trial with an embedded process evaluation.参与是测试审计和反馈设计特征的必要条件:一项实用的、多因素、集群随机试验的结果,其中嵌入了一个过程评估。
Implement Sci. 2023 May 10;18(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01271-6.
8
Optimizing responsiveness to feedback about antibiotic prescribing in primary care: protocol for two interrelated randomized implementation trials with embedded process evaluations.优化初级保健中抗生素处方反馈的响应:两项相互关联的随机实施试验的方案,嵌入了过程评估。
Implement Sci. 2022 Feb 14;17(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01194-8.
9
Multiple goals and time constraints: perceived impact on physicians' performance of evidence-based behaviours.多目标和时间限制:对医生实施基于证据的行为表现的感知影响。
Implement Sci. 2009 Nov 26;4:77. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-77.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanisms of change of a multifaceted implementation strategy on fidelity to a guideline for the prevention of mental health problems at the workplace: a mechanism analysis within a cluster-randomized controlled trial.一项多方面实施策略对工作场所预防心理健康问题指南依从性的改变机制:一项整群随机对照试验中的机制分析
Implement Sci. 2025 May 30;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01437-4.
2
Mechanisms of change of a multifaceted implementation strategy on fidelity to a guideline for the prevention of mental health problems at the workplace: A mechanism analysis within a cluster-randomized trial.一种多方面实施策略对工作场所预防心理健康问题指南依从性的改变机制:一项整群随机试验中的机制分析
Res Sq. 2025 Apr 9:rs.3.rs-5580874. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5580874/v1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Testing feedback message framing and comparators to address prescribing of high-risk medications in nursing homes: protocol for a pragmatic, factorial, cluster-randomized trial.测试反馈信息框架和对照物以解决养老院中高危药物的处方问题:一项实用、析因、整群随机试验的方案。
Implement Sci. 2017 Jul 14;12(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0615-7.
2
Improving the appropriateness of antipsychotic prescribing in nursing homes: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an academic detailing intervention.提高养老院中抗精神病药物处方的合理性:一项针对学术指导干预措施的混合方法过程评估
Implement Sci. 2017 May 26;12(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0602-z.
3
Audit and group feedback in nursing home physician groups: lessons learned from a qualitative study.养老院医生团队中的审计与集体反馈:定性研究的经验教训
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 11;25(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12355-y.
4
Academic detailing to improve appropriate opioid prescribing: a mixed-methods process evaluation.学术推广以改善阿片类药物的合理处方:一项混合方法的过程评估
CMAJ Open. 2023 Oct 17;11(5):E932-E941. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210050. Print 2023 Sep-Oct.
5
Making the most of audit and feedback to improve diabetes care: a qualitative study of the perspectives of Australian Diabetes Centres.充分利用审核和反馈以改善糖尿病护理:对澳大利亚糖尿病中心观点的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 24;22(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07652-9.
6
Embedded trials within national clinical audit programmes: A qualitative interview study of enablers and barriers.嵌入国家临床审计项目中的试验:一项关于促进因素和障碍的定性访谈研究。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2022 Jan;27(1):50-61. doi: 10.1177/13558196211044321. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
A theory-based process evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial of printed educational messages to increase primary care physicians' prescription of thiazide diuretics for hypertension [ISRCTN72772651].
一项基于理论的过程评估,同时进行一项关于印刷教育信息的随机对照试验,以增加初级保健医生对噻嗪类利尿剂治疗高血压的处方量[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN72772651]
Implement Sci. 2016 Sep 13;11(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0485-4.
4
"You Can't Always Get What You Want": A Novel Research Paradigm to Explore the Relationship between Multiple Intentions and Behaviours.“欲壑难填”:一种探索多种意图与行为之间关系的新颖研究范式。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2016 Jul;8(2):258-75. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12071. Epub 2016 May 27.
5
Impact of goal priority and goal conflict on the intention-health-behavior relationship: Tests on physical activity and other health behaviors.目标优先级和目标冲突对意图-健康-行为关系的影响:对体育活动及其他健康行为的测试
Health Psychol. 2016 Sep;35(9):1017-26. doi: 10.1037/hea0000340. Epub 2016 May 16.
6
Practice Feedback Interventions: 15 Suggestions for Optimizing Effectiveness.实践反馈干预:优化效果的 15 条建议。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Mar 15;164(6):435-41. doi: 10.7326/M15-2248. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
7
Beyond single behaviour theory: Adding cross-behaviour cognitions to the health action process approach.超越单一行为理论:将跨行为认知纳入健康行动过程方法。
Br J Health Psychol. 2015 Nov;20(4):824-41. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12144. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
8
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.复杂干预措施的过程评估:医学研究委员会指南。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
9
No more 'business as usual' with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention.不再“按部就班”:走向振兴干预议程的审计和反馈干预。
Implement Sci. 2014 Jan 17;9:14. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-14.
10
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.运用多学科健康研究中定性数据分析的框架方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.