Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska Institute Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Huddinge, Sweden
Pregnancy Care and Delivery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023 Oct;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002048.
To evaluate long-term neurodevelopment in children born after low-or mid-station vacuum-assisted delivery (VAD) compared with children delivered by second-stage caesarean delivery (SSCD) or spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD).
Cross-sectional cohort study.
Two delivery wards, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden.
253 children born by low-station or mid-station VAD, 247 children born after an SVD, and 86 children born via an SSCD accepted to participate.
The Five-to-Fifteen questionnaire was used as a validated screening method for neurodevelopmental difficulties, assessed by parents.
Results in the Five-to-Fifteen questionnaire. In addition, registered neurodevelopmental ICD-10 diagnoses were collected. Regression analyses estimated associations between delivery modes.
Children born after VAD exhibited an increased rate of long-term neurodevelopmental difficulties in motor skills (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3 to 3.8) and perception (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.002 to 2.9) compared with SVD. Similar findings were seen in the group delivered with an SSCD compared with SVD (motor skills: OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.8 to 6.4 and perception: OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2 to 4.4). The increased odds for motor skills difficulties after VAD and SSCD remained after adjusting for proposed confounding variables. There were significantly more children in the VAD group with registered neurodevelopmental ICD-10 diagnoses such as attention deficit/hyperactivity disorders.
The differences in long-term neurodevelopmental difficulties in children delivered with a VAD or SSCD compared with SVD in this study indicate the need for increased knowledge in the field to optimise the management of second stage of labour.
评估低位或中位部位真空辅助分娩(VAD)后出生的儿童与经第二产程剖宫产(SSCD)或自然阴道分娩(SVD)后出生的儿童的长期神经发育情况。
横断面队列研究。
瑞典卡罗林斯卡大学医院的两个分娩病房。
253 名接受低位或中位 VAD 分娩的儿童、247 名接受 SVD 分娩的儿童和 86 名接受 SSCD 分娩的儿童同意参与。
使用 Five-to-Fifteen 问卷作为经过验证的筛查方法,由家长评估神经发育困难情况。
Five-to-Fifteen 问卷的结果。此外,还收集了已登记的神经发育 ICD-10 诊断。回归分析估计了分娩方式之间的关联。
与 SVD 相比,接受 VAD 分娩的儿童在运动技能(OR 2.2,95%CI 1.3 至 3.8)和感知(OR 1.7,95%CI 1.002 至 2.9)方面出现长期神经发育困难的比率更高。与 SVD 相比,接受 SSCD 分娩的儿童也出现了类似的发现(运动技能:OR 3.3,95%CI 1.8 至 6.4;感知:OR 2.3,95%CI 1.2 至 4.4)。在调整了可能的混杂变量后,VAD 和 SSCD 后运动技能困难的几率仍然增加。VAD 组中,有更多的儿童被登记为神经发育 ICD-10 诊断,如注意缺陷/多动障碍。
与 SVD 相比,本研究中接受 VAD 或 SSCD 分娩的儿童在长期神经发育困难方面存在差异,这表明需要在该领域增加知识,以优化第二产程的管理。