Department of Nephrology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 102 Youyi North Street, Qiaoxi District, Hebei province, Shijiazhuang, China.
BMC Nephrol. 2023 Oct 17;24(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12882-023-03361-5.
To access the efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and arteriovenous fistula reconstruction for immature arteriovenous fistula, compare the long-term patency and post-operative complications between them.
The medical records and Hemodialysis record sheets from 44 patients between May 2020 and January 2022 who underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or arteriovenous fistula reconstruction treatment for immature autogenous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the type of surgery they received, including 25 patients in the PTA group and 19 patients in the AVF reconstruction group. Clinical outcomes were included, such as the primary and secondary patency rates following the procedure, maturation time, peak systolic velocity (PSV) of brachial artery, maximum pump-controlled blood flow at initial dialysis, and post-operative complications rates in the two groups.
Technical and clinical success was achieved in 100% of the 44 cases. For patients who underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, the primary patency rate at 3, 6, and 9 months was 84.0%, 68.0%, 60.0%, and the secondary patency rate was 92.0%, 84.0%, 80.0%, respectively. And for patients who underwent arteriovenous fistula reconstruction, the primary patency rate at 3, 6, and 9 months was 89.5%, 73.7%, 68.4%, and the secondary patency rate was 100.0%, 94.7%, 94.7%, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of patency rates (p > .050). In patients whose maturation was successful, the average maturation time of fistula after the PTA procedure was 19.36 ± 13.94 days, and 58.63 ± 18.95 days for the reconstruction procedure (p < .010). The PSV of brachial artery before and after the procedure was 87.64 ± 23.87 cm/s and 153.20 ± 21.69 cm/s in PTA group, for reconstruction group, the number was 86.26 ± 20.59 cm/s and 151.26 ± 29.94 cm/s, respectively. No statistically significant differences (p > .050). The maximum pump-controlled blood flow at initial dialysis was 232.60 ± 16.72 ml/min in PTA group, which was significantly higher than 197.11 ± 10.45 ml/min in reconstruction group (p < .010). Subcutaneous hematoma, restenosis, thrombus formation, and pseudoaneurysm were major complications in PTA group. Restenosis, thrombus formation, and pseudoaneurysm were major complications in reconstruction group, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups (p > .050).
When immature AVFs require reconstruction surgery, the patency outcomes are comparable to AVFs that undergo successful management by PTA. While, when AVFs are successfully managed by PTA, they have significantly less maturation times and higher maximum pump-controlled blood flow rates at initial dialysis AVF use.
为了评估经皮腔内血管成形术和动静脉瘘重建术治疗不成熟动静脉瘘的疗效,比较两种方法的长期通畅率和术后并发症。
回顾性分析 2020 年 5 月至 2022 年 1 月期间因不成熟自体动静脉瘘(AVF)接受经皮腔内血管成形术或动静脉瘘重建术治疗的 44 例患者的病历和血液透析记录单。根据手术类型将患者分为两组,其中 PTA 组 25 例,动静脉瘘重建组 19 例。记录两组患者的临床结局,包括手术的通畅率、成熟时间、肱动脉收缩期峰值流速(PSV)、首次透析时最大泵控血流和术后并发症发生率。
44 例患者均成功完成手术,技术和临床成功率为 100%。PTA 组患者术后 3、6、9 个月的主通畅率分别为 84.0%、68.0%、60.0%,次通畅率分别为 92.0%、84.0%、80.0%;动静脉瘘重建组患者术后 3、6、9 个月的主通畅率分别为 89.5%、73.7%、68.4%,次通畅率分别为 100.0%、94.7%、94.7%。两组患者的通畅率无统计学差异(p>0.050)。在成熟成功的患者中,PTA 术后瘘管的平均成熟时间为 19.36±13.94 天,重建术后为 58.63±18.95 天(p<0.010)。PTA 组患者术前肱动脉 PSV 为 87.64±23.87cm/s,术后为 153.20±21.69cm/s;重建组患者术前 PSV 为 86.26±20.59cm/s,术后为 151.26±29.94cm/s,两组间差异均无统计学意义(p>0.050)。PTA 组患者首次透析时最大泵控血流为 232.60±16.72ml/min,明显高于重建组的 197.11±10.45ml/min(p<0.010)。PTA 组主要并发症为皮下血肿、再狭窄、血栓形成和假性动脉瘤;重建组的主要并发症为再狭窄、血栓形成和假性动脉瘤,两组间差异无统计学意义(p>0.050)。
当不成熟 AVF 需要重建手术时,其通畅效果与成功接受 PTA 治疗的 AVF 相当。然而,当 AVF 成功接受 PTA 治疗时,其成熟时间显著缩短,首次透析时的最大泵控血流更高。