Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Center for Immuno-Oncology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Am J Hematol. 2024 Jan;99(1):38-47. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27126. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
We investigated the impact of donor age (younger [≤35 years] vs. older [>35 years]) after accounting for other non-HLA and HLA factors on outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (n = 790). The effect differed by conditioning-partly related to the differences in the recipient age in myeloablative (MAC; median 46 years) versus reduced-intensity/non-myeloablative conditioning (RIC/NMA; median 61 years) groups. With MAC (n = 320), donor age had no impact on acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), but older donors were associated with a significantly higher risk of chronic GVHD (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-2.30, p = .02) independent of recipient age and other factors. Donor age had no impact on either relapse or non-relapse mortality (NRM). The impact of donor/recipient age on overall survival changed over time. Older donors were associated with significantly higher late overall mortality (>6 months) in younger recipients (≤ 50 years; HR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.03-4.6, p = .04) but not older recipients. With RIC/NMA (n = 470), neither recipient's nor donor's age influenced the risk of GVHD. Donor age had no significant impact on the risk of relapse, but older donors were associated with a significantly higher risk of NRM (HR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.02-2.6, p = .04) independent of recipient age. Older donor age was associated with significantly higher late overall mortality (>9 months) in older recipients (>50 years; HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.0-2.67; p = .049) but not in younger recipients. Donor selection based on donor age may require a tailored approach for a particular recipient.
我们研究了供者年龄(年轻[≤35 岁]与年长[>35 岁])在考虑其他非 HLA 和 HLA 因素后对接受 HLA 单倍体相合造血细胞移植的急性髓系白血病患者(n=790)结局的影响。这种影响因预处理方式而不同-部分与清髓性(MAC;中位年龄 46 岁)与非清髓性/低强度预处理(RIC/NMA;中位年龄 61 岁)组中受者年龄的差异有关。在 MAC(n=320)组中,供者年龄对急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)无影响,但年长供者发生慢性 GVHD 的风险显著较高(危险比[HR]:1.6,95%置信区间[CI]:1.10-2.30,p=0.02),与受者年龄和其他因素无关。供者年龄对复发或非复发死亡率(NRM)无影响。供者/受者年龄对总生存的影响随时间而变化。在年轻受者(≤50 岁)中,年长供者与晚期总死亡率(>6 个月)显著较高相关(HR:2.2,95%CI:1.03-4.6,p=0.04),但在年长受者中无此相关性。在 RIC/NMA(n=470)组中,受者和供者年龄均不影响 GVHD 的风险。供者年龄对复发风险无显著影响,但年长供者与 NRM 风险显著较高相关(HR:1.6,95%CI:1.02-2.6,p=0.04),与受者年龄无关。在年长受者(>50 岁)中,年长供者与晚期总死亡率(>9 个月)显著较高相关(HR:1.66,95%CI:1.0-2.67;p=0.049),但在年轻受者中无此相关性。供者年龄的选择可能需要针对特定受者采用量身定制的方法。