Suppr超能文献

前额顶叶损伤后的周期性注意缺陷为节律性注意取样提供了因果证据。

Periodic attention deficits after frontoparietal lesions provide causal evidence for rhythmic attentional sampling.

机构信息

Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University Medical Center Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; International Max Planck Research School for the Mechanisms of Mental Function and Dysfunction, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Department of Psychology and the Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

出版信息

Curr Biol. 2023 Nov 20;33(22):4893-4904.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.09.065. Epub 2023 Oct 17.

Abstract

Contemporary models conceptualize spatial attention as a blinking spotlight that sequentially samples visual space. Hence, behavior fluctuates over time, even in states of presumed "sustained" attention. Recent evidence has suggested that rhythmic neural activity in the frontoparietal network constitutes the functional basis of rhythmic attentional sampling. However, causal evidence to support this notion remains absent. Using a lateralized spatial attention task, we addressed this issue in patients with focal lesions in the frontoparietal attention network. Our results revealed that frontoparietal lesions introduce periodic attention deficits, i.e., temporally specific behavioral deficits that are aligned with the underlying neural oscillations. Attention-guided perceptual sensitivity was on par with that of healthy controls during optimal phases but was attenuated during the less excitable sub-cycles. Theta-dependent sampling (3-8 Hz) was causally dependent on the prefrontal cortex, while high-alpha/low-beta sampling (8-14 Hz) emerged from parietal areas. Collectively, our findings reveal that lesion-induced high-amplitude, low-frequency brain activity is not epiphenomenal but has immediate behavioral consequences. More generally, these results provide causal evidence for the hypothesis that the functional architecture of attention is inherently rhythmic.

摘要

当代的模型将空间注意力概念化为一个闪烁的聚光灯,它依次对视觉空间进行采样。因此,即使在被认为是“持续”注意的状态下,行为也会随时间波动。最近的证据表明,额顶网络中的节律性神经活动构成了节律性注意采样的功能基础。然而,支持这一观点的因果证据仍然缺乏。使用侧化空间注意任务,我们在额顶注意网络中有局灶性病变的患者中解决了这个问题。我们的结果表明,额顶病变会导致周期性的注意力缺陷,即与潜在的神经振荡相一致的、具有时间特异性的行为缺陷。在最佳相位期间,注意引导的感知敏感性与健康对照组相当,但在兴奋性较低的亚周期期间会减弱。θ依赖性采样(3-8 Hz)取决于前额叶皮层,而高α/低β采样(8-14 Hz)则来自顶叶区域。总的来说,这些发现表明,病变引起的高振幅、低频率脑活动不是偶然现象,而是有直接的行为后果。更一般地说,这些结果为注意力的功能结构本质上是有节奏的假设提供了因果证据。

相似文献

2
Neural Mechanisms of Sustained Attention Are Rhythmic.持续注意力的神经机制是有节奏的。
Neuron. 2018 Aug 22;99(4):854-865.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.032.
5
Sequential sampling of visual objects during sustained attention.持续注意力期间视觉对象的顺序采样。
PLoS Biol. 2017 Jun 28;15(6):e2001903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001903. eCollection 2017 Jun.
10
The neural bases of spatial attention and perceptual rhythms.空间注意和知觉节律的神经基础。
Eur J Neurosci. 2022 Jun;55(11-12):3209-3223. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15044. Epub 2020 Nov 27.

本文引用的文献

2
Quantifying rhythmicity in perceptual reports.量化知觉报告中的节律性。
Neuroimage. 2022 Nov 15;262:119561. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119561. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
9
Feature-Based Attention Samples Stimuli Rhythmically.基于特征的注意力有节奏地抽样刺激。
Curr Biol. 2019 Feb 18;29(4):693-699.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验