Jia Jianrong, Liu Ling, Fang Fang, Luo Huan
School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Peking University, Beijing, China.
PLoS Biol. 2017 Jun 28;15(6):e2001903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001903. eCollection 2017 Jun.
In a crowded visual scene, attention must be distributed efficiently and flexibly over time and space to accommodate different contexts. It is well established that selective attention enhances the corresponding neural responses, presumably implying that attention would persistently dwell on the task-relevant item. Meanwhile, recent studies, mostly in divided attentional contexts, suggest that attention does not remain stationary but samples objects alternately over time, suggesting a rhythmic view of attention. However, it remains unknown whether the dynamic mechanism essentially mediates attentional processes at a general level. Importantly, there is also a complete lack of direct neural evidence reflecting whether and how the brain rhythmically samples multiple visual objects during stimulus processing. To address these issues, in this study, we employed electroencephalography (EEG) and a temporal response function (TRF) approach, which can dissociate responses that exclusively represent a single object from the overall neuronal activity, to examine the spatiotemporal characteristics of attention in various attentional contexts. First, attention, which is characterized by inhibitory alpha-band (approximately 10 Hz) activity in TRFs, switches between attended and unattended objects every approximately 200 ms, suggesting a sequential sampling even when attention is required to mostly stay on the attended object. Second, the attentional spatiotemporal pattern is modulated by the task context, such that alpha-mediated switching becomes increasingly prominent as the task requires a more uniform distribution of attention. Finally, the switching pattern correlates with attentional behavioral performance. Our work provides direct neural evidence supporting a generally central role of temporal organization mechanism in attention, such that multiple objects are sequentially sorted according to their priority in attentional contexts. The results suggest that selective attention, in addition to the classically posited attentional "focus," involves a dynamic mechanism for monitoring all objects outside of the focus. Our findings also suggest that attention implements a space (object)-to-time transformation by acting as a series of concatenating attentional chunks that operate on 1 object at a time.
在拥挤的视觉场景中,注意力必须随着时间和空间高效且灵活地分配,以适应不同的情境。众所周知,选择性注意会增强相应的神经反应,这大概意味着注意力会持续聚焦于与任务相关的项目。与此同时,最近的研究(大多在注意力分散的情境下)表明,注意力并非静止不动,而是随着时间交替对物体进行采样,这暗示了一种关于注意力的节律性观点。然而,尚不清楚这种动态机制是否在一般层面上本质地介导了注意力过程。重要的是,也完全缺乏直接的神经证据来反映大脑在刺激处理过程中是否以及如何有节律地对多个视觉对象进行采样。为了解决这些问题,在本研究中,我们采用了脑电图(EEG)和时间响应函数(TRF)方法,该方法可以从整体神经元活动中分离出专门代表单个对象的反应,以研究各种注意力情境下注意力的时空特征。首先,以TRF中抑制性α波段(约10赫兹)活动为特征的注意力,每隔约200毫秒在被关注和未被关注的对象之间切换,这表明即使需要注意力大多停留在被关注对象上时,也存在顺序采样。其次,注意力的时空模式受任务情境调节,使得随着任务要求注意力更均匀地分配,α介导的切换变得越来越突出。最后,切换模式与注意力行为表现相关。我们的工作提供了直接的神经证据,支持时间组织机制在注意力中具有普遍的核心作用,即在注意力情境中多个对象根据其优先级被顺序排序。结果表明,选择性注意除了经典假定的注意力 “焦点” 外,还涉及一种用于监测焦点之外所有对象的动态机制。我们的发现还表明,注意力通过作为一系列连续的注意力块来实现空间(对象)到时间的转换,这些注意力块一次对一个对象进行操作。