Suppr超能文献

机器人手臂辅助全膝关节置换术和单髁膝关节置换术与传统技术相比的住院时间、出院处置及延迟出院的预测因素

Length of stay and discharge dispositions following robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus conventional technique and predictors of delayed discharge.

作者信息

Fontalis Andreas, Raj Rhody D, Haddad Isabella C, Donovan Christian, Plastow Ricci, Oussedik Sam, Gabr Ayman, Haddad Fares S

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Bone Jt Open. 2023 Oct 19;4(10):791-800. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.410.BJO-2023-0126.R1.

Abstract

AIMS

In-hospital length of stay (LOS) and discharge dispositions following arthroplasty could act as surrogate measures for improvement in patient pathways, and have major cost saving implications for healthcare providers. With the ever-growing adoption of robotic technology in arthroplasty, it is imperative to evaluate its impact on LOS. The objectives of this study were to compare LOS and discharge dispositions following robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RO TKA) and unicompartmental arthroplasty (RO UKA) versus conventional technique (CO TKA and UKA).

METHODS

This large-scale, single-institution study included patients of any age undergoing primary TKA (n = 1,375) or UKA (n = 337) for any cause between May 2019 and January 2023. Data extracted included patient demographics, LOS, need for post anaesthesia care unit (PACU) admission, anaesthesia type, readmission within 30 days, and discharge dispositions. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were also employed to identify factors and patient characteristics related to delayed discharge.

RESULTS

The median LOS in the RO TKA group was 76 hours (interquartile range (IQR) 54 to 104) versus 82.5 (IQR 58 to 127) in the CO TKA group (p < 0.001) and 54 hours (IQR 34 to 77) in the RO UKA versus 58 (IQR 35 to 81) in the CO UKA (p = 0.031). Discharge dispositions were comparable between the two groups. A higher percentage of patients undergoing CO TKA required PACU admission (8% vs 5.2%; p = 0.040).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that robotic arm assistance was associated with a shorter LOS in patients undergoing primary UKA and TKA, and no difference in the discharge destinations. Our results suggest that robotic arm assistance could be advantageous in partly addressing the upsurge of knee arthroplasty procedures and the concomitant healthcare burden; however, this needs to be corroborated by long-term cost-effectiveness analyses and data from randomized controlled studies.

摘要

目的

关节置换术后的住院时长(LOS)和出院处置可作为改善患者就医流程的替代指标,对医疗服务提供者而言具有重大的成本节约意义。随着机器人技术在关节置换术中的应用日益广泛,评估其对住院时长的影响势在必行。本研究的目的是比较机器人手臂辅助全膝关节置换术(RO TKA)和单髁关节置换术(RO UKA)与传统技术(CO TKA和UKA)后的住院时长和出院处置情况。

方法

这项大规模的单机构研究纳入了2019年5月至2023年1月期间因任何原因接受初次全膝关节置换术(n = 1375)或单髁关节置换术(n = 337)的任何年龄患者。提取的数据包括患者人口统计学信息、住院时长、术后麻醉护理单元(PACU)收治需求、麻醉类型、30天内再入院情况以及出院处置。还采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归模型来确定与延迟出院相关的因素和患者特征。

结果

RO TKA组的住院时长中位数为76小时(四分位间距(IQR)54至104),而CO TKA组为82.5小时(IQR 58至127)(p < 0.001);RO UKA组为54小时(IQR 34至77),CO UKA组为58小时(IQR 35至81)(p = 0.031)。两组的出院处置情况相当。接受CO TKA的患者中需要收治到PACU的比例更高(8%对5.2%;p = 0.040)。

结论

我们的研究表明,机器人手臂辅助与初次单髁关节置换术和全膝关节置换术患者的住院时长缩短相关,且出院去向无差异。我们的结果表明,机器人手臂辅助在部分应对膝关节置换手术激增及随之而来的医疗负担方面可能具有优势;然而,这需要长期成本效益分析和随机对照研究的数据加以证实。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9896/10614696/262baf9ef65f/BJO-2023-0126.R1-galleyfig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验