Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Bone Joint J. 2022 Apr;104-B(4):433-443. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B4.BJJ-2021-0837.R1.
The aim of this study was to compare any differences in the primary outcome (biphasic flexion knee moment during gait) of robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bi-UKA) with conventional mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at one year post-surgery.
A total of 76 patients (34 bi-UKA and 42 TKA patients) were analyzed in a prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled trial. Flat ground shod gait analysis was performed preoperatively and one year postoperatively. Knee flexion moment was calculated from motion capture markers and force plates. The same setup determined proprioception outcomes during a joint position sense test and one-leg standing. Surgery allocation, surgeon, and secondary outcomes were analyzed for prediction of the primary outcome from a binary regression model.
Both interventions were shown to be effective treatment options, with no significant differences shown between interventions for the primary outcome of this study (18/35 (51.4%) biphasic TKA patients vs 20/31 (64.5%) biphasic bi-UKA patients; p = 0.558). All outcomes were compared to an age-matched, healthy cohort that outperformed both groups, indicating residual deficits exists following surgery. Logistic regression analysis of primary outcome with secondary outcomes indicated that the most significant predictor of postoperative biphasic knee moments was preoperative knee moment profile and trochlear degradation (Outerbridge) (R = 0.381; p = 0.002, p = 0.046). A separate regression of alignment against primary outcome indicated significant bi-UKA femoral and tibial axial alignment (R = 0.352; p = 0.029), and TKA femoral sagittal alignment (R = 0.252; p = 0.016). The bi-UKA group showed a significant increased ability in the proprioceptive joint position test, but no difference was found in more dynamic testing of proprioception.
Robotic arm-assisted bi-UKA demonstrated equivalence to TKA in achieving a biphasic gait pattern after surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. Both treatments are successful at improving gait, but both leave the patients with a functional limitation that is not present in healthy age-matched controls. Cite this article: 2022;103-B(4):433-443.
本研究旨在比较机器人辅助双间室膝关节置换术(bi-UKA)与传统机械对线全膝关节置换术(TKA)在术后 1 年时的主要结局(步态中双相膝关节屈曲力矩)是否存在差异。
一项前瞻性、单中心、随机对照试验共分析了 76 例患者(34 例 bi-UKA 和 42 例 TKA 患者)。术前和术后 1 年进行平地穿鞋步态分析。从运动捕捉标记和力板计算膝关节屈曲力矩。相同的设置在关节位置感测试和单腿站立期间确定本体感受结果。从二元回归模型分析手术分配、外科医生和次要结局对主要结局的预测。
两种干预措施均被证明是有效的治疗选择,两种干预措施在本研究的主要结局(18/35(51.4%)双相 TKA 患者与 20/31(64.5%)双相 bi-UKA 患者;p = 0.558)之间无显著差异。所有结果均与年龄匹配的健康队列进行比较,该队列表现优于两组,表明手术后仍存在残留缺陷。主要结局与次要结局的逻辑回归分析表明,术后双相膝关节力矩的最显著预测因子是术前膝关节力矩曲线和滑车(Outerbridge)退化(R = 0.381;p = 0.002,p = 0.046)。对对准线与主要结局的单独回归表明,bi-UKA 股骨和胫骨轴向对准具有显著意义(R = 0.352;p = 0.029),TKA 股骨矢状位对准具有显著意义(R = 0.252;p = 0.016)。bi-UKA 组在本体感受关节位置测试中表现出显著的提高能力,但在本体感受的更动态测试中没有发现差异。
机器人辅助 bi-UKA 在膝关节骨关节炎手术后达到双相步态模式方面与 TKA 等效。两种治疗方法都成功地改善了步态,但都使患者出现了功能受限,而在年龄匹配的健康对照组中则不存在这种情况。引用本文:2022;103-B(4):433-443.