Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
J Formos Med Assoc. 2024 Apr;123(4):487-495. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.09.020. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
The approved standard dose of pembrolizumab (200 mg administrated every 3 weeks) for cancer treatment imposes a significant financial burden on patients. However, no study has analyzed the clinical outcomes of low-dose pembrolizumab among individuals diagnosed with gynecologic cancer. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of a low-dose pembrolizumab regimen in real-world clinical practice.
We retrospectively assessed the efficacy and safety data of patients with gynecologic malignancies who received pembrolizumab between 2017 and 2022 at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Furthermore, we conducted a comparative analysis of the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and proficient MMR (pMMR).
A total of thirty-nine patients were included and received pembrolizumab at fixed dosages of 50 mg (5.1%), 100 mg (84.6%) and 200 mg (10.3%) per cycle. Compared to the pMMR group, the dMMR group exhibited a tendency toward improved ORR (45.5% vs. 13.0%, p = 0.074), and notably, the median duration of response remained unreached. There was no significant difference in PFS between the dMMR and pMMR groups; however, the patients with dMMR in tumor tissue had a trend of better survival (p = 0.079). Incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of any grade was observed in 13 patients (33.3%), with 3 individuals (7.7%) experiencing grade 3 or 4 events.
Low-dose pembrolizumab may be a cost-effective and safe treatment option without compromising clinical outcomes in patients with refractory gynecologic cancers.
目前,癌症治疗中已批准的标准剂量派姆单抗(每 3 周给药 200mg)给患者带来了巨大的经济负担。然而,尚无研究分析过在诊断为妇科癌症的患者中使用低剂量派姆单抗的临床结局。本研究的主要目的是评估真实世界临床实践中低剂量派姆单抗方案的有效性和安全性。
我们回顾性评估了 2017 年至 2022 年期间在高雄长庚纪念医院接受派姆单抗治疗的妇科恶性肿瘤患者的疗效和安全性数据。此外,我们还比较了错配修复缺陷(dMMR)和错配修复 proficient(pMMR)患者的客观缓解率(ORR)和无进展生存期(PFS)。
共纳入 39 例患者,分别接受 50mg(5.1%)、100mg(84.6%)和 200mg(10.3%)固定剂量的派姆单抗治疗。与 pMMR 组相比,dMMR 组的 ORR 有改善的趋势(45.5% vs. 13.0%,p=0.074),且中位缓解持续时间未达到。dMMR 和 pMMR 组之间的 PFS 无显著差异;然而,在肿瘤组织中存在 dMMR 的患者的生存趋势较好(p=0.079)。13 例(33.3%)患者出现任何等级的免疫相关不良事件(irAEs),3 例(7.7%)患者发生 3 级或 4 级事件。
低剂量派姆单抗可能是一种具有成本效益且安全的治疗选择,不会影响难治性妇科癌症患者的临床结局。