Olaluwoye Tosin, Hoban Elizabeth, Williams Joanne
Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia.
Confl Health. 2023 Oct 18;17(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13031-023-00544-7.
Consideration for men as survivors of sexual violence in conflict and post-conflict settings has gained some prominence in the last decade. There remains a paucity of empirical data on forms of sexual violence from the survivors' perspective, and no study has considered the context of the 2013 South Sudan conflict specifically.
This paper reports the findings of an exploratory qualitative study on the forms of sexual violence perpetrated against men in conflict and post-conflict settings, with the survivors as the main participants. A purposive sampling technique was used to recruit 26 South Sudanese male sexual violence survivors who have resettled in two refugee resettlement communities in Uganda since the onset of the 2013 South Sudan conflict. In-depth semi-structured interviews were used to collect the data from the male survivors. Six humanitarian aid workers who support sexual violence survivors also participated as key informants. Thematic data analysis was performed on the qualitative data.
The 26 survivors reported experiencing eight direct and two indirect forms of sexual violence in conflict and post-conflict settings. The direct forms include (1) striping men naked; (2) male rape; (3) exchange of sex for favours; (4) forcing men to rape other people; (5) genital mutilation; (6) genital beating; (7) insertion of objects into men's anus, and (8) taking men as wives. The indirect forms were forcing men to witness the rape of a female relative and forcing men to cheer or assist during the rape of other people.
To maximize positive health outcomes for survivors, stakeholders must consider both direct and indirect forms of male-directed conflict-related sexual violence in policy and practice.
在过去十年中,将男性视为冲突及冲突后环境中性暴力幸存者的考量已受到一定程度的关注。从幸存者角度来看,关于性暴力形式的实证数据仍然匮乏,且尚无研究专门考虑2013年南苏丹冲突的背景情况。
本文报告了一项探索性定性研究的结果,该研究以幸存者为主要参与者,探讨冲突及冲突后环境中针对男性的性暴力形式。采用目的抽样技术,招募了26名自2013年南苏丹冲突爆发以来已在乌干达两个难民安置社区重新定居的南苏丹男性性暴力幸存者。通过深入的半结构化访谈从男性幸存者那里收集数据。六名支持性暴力幸存者的人道主义援助工作者也作为关键信息提供者参与其中。对定性数据进行了主题数据分析。
26名幸存者报告称在冲突及冲突后环境中经历了八种直接和两种间接形式的性暴力。直接形式包括:(1)剥光男性衣服;(2)男性强奸;(3)以性换取好处;(4)强迫男性强奸他人;(5)切割生殖器官;(6)击打生殖器;(7)将物体插入男性肛门;(8)将男性当作妻子。间接形式为强迫男性目睹女性亲属被强奸以及在他人被强奸时强迫男性欢呼或协助。
为了使幸存者获得最佳的健康结果,利益相关者在政策和实践中必须同时考虑直接和间接形式的与冲突相关的针对男性的性暴力。