Yan Qi, Jensen Jason E, Jensen Katherine J, Dao Campi Haisar E, Logue Alicia, Perry W Brian, Davies Mark G
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
South Texas Center for Vascular Care, South Texas Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Am Surg. 2024 Apr;90(4):682-690. doi: 10.1177/00031348231206583. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
One-third of American adults encompassed by current colorectal cancer screening guidelines fail to obtain recommended screening evaluations. Educational videos are a valuable medium through which to educate and encourage recommended health behaviors in patients.
A cross-sectional study reviewing the quality of patient education videos addressing colorectal cancer screening. Video quality was assessed in 3 domains: accountability, content, and production.
Forty-four videos met inclusion criteria. Out of 33 possible points, videos scored a median of 15.0 (interquartile range 12.9-16.6). Videos scored 1.0 (interquartile range .8-1.0) out of 4.0 for accountability, 6.0 (interquartile range 4.4-8.0) out of 20 for content, and 8.0 (interquartile range 7.4-8.0) out of 9.0 for production. Colonoscopy was the most frequently discussed method of screening (38, 86%). While 13 (34%) videos discussed the risk of colorectal cancer in the general population and 15 (32%) discussed the risk in those with a family history, few videos addressed those with other risk factors. Most (31, 70%) videos discussed the medical consequences of not receiving screening, but only 1 (2%) video discussed the social consequences. Similarly, medical benefits were discussed in 34 (77%) videos while other benefits were not discussed by any video. Only one-fifth of the videos address three or more barriers to screening.
Videos on colorectal cancer screening have excellent production quality but need improvement in the domains of accountability and content. The videos included in this analysis did not adequately address the concerns of viewers nor the benefits of colorectal cancer screening.
当前结直肠癌筛查指南所涵盖的美国成年人中,三分之一未能获得推荐的筛查评估。教育视频是教育和鼓励患者采取推荐健康行为的宝贵媒介。
一项横断面研究,回顾了结直肠癌筛查患者教育视频的质量。视频质量在三个领域进行评估:问责性、内容和制作。
44个视频符合纳入标准。在33个可能的分数中,视频的中位数得分为15.0(四分位间距为12.9 - 16.6)。问责性方面,视频在4.0分中得分为1.0(四分位间距为0.8 - 1.0);内容方面,在20分中得分为6.0(四分位间距为4.4 - 8.0);制作方面,在9.0分中得分为8.0(四分位间距为7.4 - 8.0)。结肠镜检查是最常讨论的筛查方法(38个,占86%)。虽然13个(34%)视频讨论了一般人群患结直肠癌的风险,15个(32%)视频讨论了有家族病史者的风险,但很少有视频涉及有其他风险因素的人群。大多数(31个,占70%)视频讨论了不进行筛查的医学后果,但只有1个(2%)视频讨论了社会后果。同样,34个(77%)视频讨论了医学益处,而没有任何视频讨论其他益处。只有五分之一的视频涉及三种或更多的筛查障碍。
结直肠癌筛查视频的制作质量很高,但在问责性和内容领域需要改进。本分析中纳入的视频没有充分解决观众的担忧,也没有充分阐述结直肠癌筛查的益处。