Mueller Simon M, Jungo Pierre, Cajacob Lucian, Schwegler Simon, Itin Peter, Brandt Oliver
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 16;21(1):e11935. doi: 10.2196/11935.
Approximately 80% of internet users access health information online and patients with chronic illnesses especially rely on internet-based resources. YouTube ranks second among the most accessed websites worldwide and hosts an increasing number of videos with medical information. However, their quality is sometimes unscientific, misleading, or even harmful.
As little is known about YouTube as a source of information on psoriasis, we aimed to investigate the quality of psoriasis-related videos and, if necessary, point out strategies for their improvement.
The quality of the 100 most viewed psoriasis-related videos was assessed using the DISCERN instrument and the Global Quality Scale (GQS) by categorizing the videos into useful, misleading, and dangerous and by evaluating the reception of the videos by users.
Evaluation of the videos exhibited a total of 117,221,391 views and a total duration of 10:28 hour. The majority of clips contained anecdotal personal experiences with complementary and alternative psoriasis treatments, topical treatments, and nutrition and diets being the most frequently addressed topics. While advertisements accounted for 26.0% (26/100) of the videos, evidence-based health information amounted to only 20.0% (20/100); 32.0% (32/100) of the videos were classified as useful, 52.0% (52/100) as misleading, and 11.0% (11/100) as even dangerous. The quality of the videos evaluated by DISCERN and GQS was generally low (1.87 and 1.95, respectively, on a 1 to 5 scale with 5 being the maximum). Moreover, we found that viewers rated poor-quality videos better than higher quality videos.
Our in-depth study demonstrates that nearly two-thirds of the psoriasis-related videos we analyzed disseminate misleading or even dangerous content. Subjective anecdotal and unscientific content is disproportionately overrepresented and poor-quality videos are predominantly rated positively by users, while higher quality video clips receive less positive ratings. Strategies by professional dermatological organizations are urgently needed to improve the quality of information on psoriasis on YouTube and other social media.
约80%的互联网用户会在线获取健康信息,慢性病患者尤其依赖网络资源。YouTube在全球访问量最大的网站中排名第二,且其上包含医学信息的视频数量不断增加。然而,这些视频的质量有时不科学、具有误导性,甚至有害。
由于对YouTube作为银屑病信息来源的了解甚少,我们旨在调查银屑病相关视频的质量,并在必要时指出改进策略。
使用DISCERN工具和全球质量量表(GQS)对100个观看次数最多的银屑病相关视频的质量进行评估,将这些视频分为有用、误导和危险三类,并评估用户对这些视频的接受度。
对这些视频的评估显示,总观看次数为117221391次,总时长为10小时28分钟。大多数视频包含补充和替代银屑病治疗、局部治疗以及营养和饮食方面的个人轶事经历,这些是最常涉及的主题。广告占视频的26.0%(26/100),而基于证据的健康信息仅占20.0%(20/100);32.0%(32/100)的视频被归类为有用,52.0%(52/100)为误导性,11.0%(11/100)甚至危险。通过DISCERN和GQS评估的视频质量普遍较低(在1至5分的量表上分别为1.87和1.95,5分为最高分)。此外,我们发现观众对低质量视频的评价高于高质量视频。
我们的深入研究表明,在我们分析的银屑病相关视频中,近三分之二传播的是误导性甚至危险的内容。主观轶事和不科学的内容占比过高,低质量视频主要得到用户的正面评价,而高质量视频片段得到的正面评价较少。迫切需要专业皮肤科组织采取策略来提高YouTube和其他社交媒体上银屑病信息的质量。