Department of Anesthesiology, Valleywise Health Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Pre-Medical Student, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024 Jan;28(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11916-023-01178-3. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
Spinal cord stimulation has been increasing in influence as an option to regulate pain, especially in the chronic pain patient population. However, even with the numerous changes made to this technology since its inception, it is still prone to various complications such as hardware issues, neurological injury/epidural hematoma, infections, and other biological concerns. The purpose of this article is to thoroughly review and evaluate literature pertaining to the complications associated with percutaneous spinal cord stimulation.
Lead migration is generally the most common complication of percutaneous spinal cord stimulation; however, recent utilization of various anchoring techniques has been discussed and experienced clinical success in decreasing the prevalence of lead migration and lead fractures. With newer high-frequency systems gaining traction to improve pain management and decrease complications as compared to traditional systems, rechargeable implantable pulse generators have been the preferred power source. However, recent findings may suggest that these rechargeable implantable pulse generators do not significantly increase battery life as much as was proposed. Intraoperative neuromonitoring has seen success in mitigating neurological injury postoperatively and may see more usage in the future through more testing. Though the occurrence of infection and biological complications, including dural puncture and skin erosion, has been less frequent over time, they should still be treated in accordance with established protocols. While many complications can arise following percutaneous spinal cord stimulator implantation, the procedure is less invasive than open implantation and has seen largely positive patient feedback. Hardware complications, the more common issues that can occur, rarely indicate a serious risk and can generally be remedied through reoperation. However, less common cases such as neurological injury, infections, and biological complications require prompt diagnosis to improve the condition of the patient and prevent significant damage.
脊髓刺激作为一种调节疼痛的选择,尤其是在慢性疼痛患者群体中,其影响力不断增加。然而,即使自发明以来对该技术进行了众多改进,它仍然容易出现各种并发症,如硬件问题、神经损伤/硬膜外血肿、感染和其他生物学问题。本文的目的是全面回顾和评估与经皮脊髓刺激相关的并发症的文献。
导丝迁移通常是经皮脊髓刺激最常见的并发症;然而,最近讨论并在临床实践中成功应用了各种固定技术,以降低导丝迁移和导丝断裂的发生率。与传统系统相比,新型高频系统在改善疼痛管理和减少并发症方面具有优势,因此可充电植入脉冲发生器已成为首选电源。然而,最近的发现表明,与预期相比,这些可充电植入脉冲发生器并没有显著增加电池寿命。术中神经监测在减少术后神经损伤方面取得了成功,并且随着更多的测试,未来可能会有更多的应用。虽然感染和生物并发症(包括硬脊膜穿刺和皮肤侵蚀)的发生率随着时间的推移而降低,但仍应按照既定方案进行治疗。虽然经皮脊髓刺激器植入后可能会出现许多并发症,但该手术比开放式植入术创伤小,且患者的反馈大多是积极的。硬件并发症是较常见的问题,很少表明存在严重风险,通常可以通过再次手术来解决。然而,神经损伤、感染和生物并发症等不常见的病例需要及时诊断,以改善患者的病情并防止严重损害。