• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Does physical therapy impact clinical outcomes after lumbar decompression surgery?物理治疗对腰椎减压手术后的临床结果有影响吗?
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2023 Jul-Sep;14(3):230-235. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_61_23. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
2
Revision lumbar fusions have higher rates of reoperation and result in worse clinical outcomes compared to primary lumbar fusions.与初次腰椎融合术相比,翻修腰椎融合术的再次手术率更高,临床结果更差。
Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):105-115. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.08.018. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
3
How do spinopelvic parameters influence patient-reported outcome measurements after lumbar decompression?脊柱骨盆参数如何影响腰椎减压术后患者报告的结局测量?
Spine J. 2020 Oct;20(10):1610-1617. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.101. Epub 2020 May 20.
4
Does Smoking Affect Short-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes After Lumbar Decompression?吸烟会影响腰椎减压术后患者报告的短期结局吗?
Global Spine J. 2021 Jun;11(5):727-732. doi: 10.1177/2192568220925791. Epub 2020 May 29.
5
Practical answers to frequently asked questions in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery.微创腰椎手术常见问题的实用解答。
Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.07.087. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
6
The Influence of Presenting Physical Function on Postoperative Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.呈现的身体功能对微创腰椎减压术后患者满意度及临床结果的影响
Clin Spine Surg. 2023 Feb 1;36(1):E6-E13. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001360. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
7
Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease.融合技术不会影响腰椎退行性疾病患者的短期报告结局。
Spine J. 2019 Dec;19(12):1960-1968. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.07.014. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
8
Severe Comorbidity Burden Does Not Influence Postoperative Clinical Outcomes and Trajectory for Back Pain, Leg Pain, Physical Function, or Disability in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Cohort-Matched Analysis.严重合并症负担不会影响微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后患者的背痛、腿痛、身体功能或残疾的术后临床结局和病程:队列匹配分析。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Aug;164:e157-e168. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.04.058. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
9
Presenting Mental Health Influences Postoperative Clinical Trajectory and Long-Term Patient Satisfaction After Lumbar Decompression.介绍心理健康对腰椎减压术后临床病程和长期患者满意度的影响。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Aug;164:e649-e661. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.024. Epub 2022 May 13.
10
Effect of Preoperative Marijuana on Patient Outcomes and Opioid Use after Lumbar Decompression.术前使用大麻对腰椎减压术后患者预后及阿片类药物使用的影响。
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):633-638. doi: 10.1177/21925682231203650. Epub 2023 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of nursing interventions on the rehabilitation outcome of patients after lumbar spine surgery.护理干预对腰椎手术后患者康复结局的影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 May 4;25(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07419-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Return to work after surgery for lumbar disc herniation, secondary analyses from a randomized controlled trial comparing supervised rehabilitation versus home exercises.腰椎间盘突出症手术后复工的研究:一项比较监督康复与家庭锻炼的随机对照试验的二次分析
Spine J. 2020 Jan;20(1):41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.019. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
2
Patient-reported Outcomes After Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation, a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effects of Referral to Municipal Physical Rehabilitation Versus No Referral.腰椎间盘突出症手术后的患者报告结局:一项比较转诊至市级物理康复与不转诊效果的随机对照试验
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Jan 1;45(1):3-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003221.
3
[Postoperative management of weight bearing and rehabilitation after lumbar spinal surgery].腰椎手术后负重及康复的术后管理
Orthopade. 2020 Mar;49(3):201-210. doi: 10.1007/s00132-019-03799-2.
4
Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life after decompression surgery without fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis.矢状位脊柱骨盆对线对腰椎管狭窄减压不融合手术后临床疗效及健康相关生活质量的影响。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Jan 25;30(4):470-475. doi: 10.3171/2018.10.SPINE181094. Print 2019 Apr 1.
5
Early comprehensive physiotherapy after lumbar spine surgery (PEDro synthesis).腰椎手术后早期综合物理治疗(PEDro系统评价)
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Jan;52(2):96-97. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098165. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
6
Effectiveness of surgery versus conservative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: A system review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.手术与保守治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Aug;44:329-338. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.07.032. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
7
Early rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery is not effective or cost-effective compared to no referral: a randomised trial and economic evaluation.与不转诊相比,腰椎间盘手术后早期康复治疗在疗效或成本效益方面并无优势:一项随机试验和经济评估。
J Physiother. 2017 Jul;63(3):144-153. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2017.05.016. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
8
Comparison of Comorbidity Scores in Predicting Surgical Outcomes.共病评分在预测手术结果中的比较。
Med Care. 2016 Feb;54(2):180-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000465.
9
Physiotherapy Commenced Within the First Four Weeks Post-Spinal Surgery Is Safe and Effective: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.脊柱手术后四周内开始物理治疗是安全有效的:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Feb;97(2):292-301. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
10
The Aging of the Global Population: The Changing Epidemiology of Disease and Spinal Disorders.全球人口老龄化:疾病与脊柱疾病流行病学的变化
Neurosurgery. 2015 Oct;77 Suppl 4:S1-5. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000953.

物理治疗对腰椎减压手术后的临床结果有影响吗?

Does physical therapy impact clinical outcomes after lumbar decompression surgery?

作者信息

Heard Jeremy C, D'Antonio Nicholas D, Lambrechts Mark J, Boere Payton, Issa Tariq Z, Lee Yunsoo A, Canseco Jose A, Kaye Ian David, Woods Barrett R, Hilibrand Alan S, Vaccaro Alexander R, Kepler Christopher K, Schroeder Gregory D

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2023 Jul-Sep;14(3):230-235. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_61_23. Epub 2023 Sep 18.

DOI:10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_61_23
PMID:37860023
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10583794/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of our study were to (1) determine if physical therapy (PT) impacts patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) after lumbar decompression surgery and (2) determine if PT impacts postsurgical readmissions or reoperations after lumbar decompression surgery.

METHODS

Patients 18 years of age who underwent primary one- or two-level lumbar decompression at our institution were identified. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, surgical outcomes (all-cause 90 days readmissions and 90 days surgical readmissions), and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) were compared between the groups. Multivariate linear regression was utilized to determine the individual predictors of 90 days readmissions and PROMs at the 1-year postoperative point. Alpha was set at < 0.05.

RESULTS

Of the 1003 patients included, 421 attended PT postoperatively. On univariate analysis, PT attendance did not significantly impact 90-day surgical reoperations ( = 0.225). Although bivariate analysis suggests that attendance of PT is associated with worse improvement in physical function ( = 0.041), increased preoperative Visual Analogue Scale leg pain (0 = 0.004), and disability ( = 0.006), as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index, our multivariate analysis, which accounts for confounding variables found there was no difference in PROM improvement and PT was not an independent predictor of 90-day all-cause readmissions ( = 0.06). Instead, Charlson Comorbidity Index ( = 0.025) and discharge to a skilled nursing facility ( = 0.013) independently predicted greater 90-day all-cause readmissions.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative lumbar decompression PT attendance does not significantly affect clinical improvement, as measured by PROMs or surgical outcomes including all-cause 90 days readmissions and 90-day surgical readmissions.

摘要

目的

我们研究的目的是(1)确定物理治疗(PT)对腰椎减压手术后患者报告结局(PROMs)的影响,以及(2)确定PT对腰椎减压手术后的再次入院或再次手术的影响。

方法

确定在我们机构接受初次单节段或双节段腰椎减压手术的18岁患者。比较两组患者的人口统计学、手术特征、手术结局(全因90天再次入院和90天手术再次入院)以及患者报告结局(PROMs)。采用多变量线性回归确定术后1年时90天再次入院和PROMs的个体预测因素。设定α<0.05。

结果

在纳入的1003例患者中,421例术后接受了PT治疗。单因素分析显示,接受PT治疗对90天手术再次手术无显著影响(P=0.225)。尽管双因素分析表明,接受PT治疗与身体功能改善较差有关(P=0.041),术前视觉模拟量表腿痛增加(P=0.004),以及由Oswestry功能障碍指数测量的残疾增加(P=0.006),但我们的多变量分析考虑了混杂变量,发现PROM改善无差异,PT不是90天全因再次入院的独立预测因素(P=0.06)。相反,Charlson合并症指数(P=0.025)和转至专业护理机构(P=0.013)独立预测90天全因再次入院率更高。

结论

腰椎减压术后接受PT治疗对临床改善无显著影响,临床改善通过PROMs或手术结局衡量,包括全因90天再次入院和90天手术再次入院。