• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

归一化重加权的时间动态。

Temporal dynamics of normalization reweighting.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and York Biomedical Research Institute, University of York, York, UK.

Department of Psychology, University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

J Vis. 2023 Oct 4;23(12):6. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.12.6.

DOI:10.1167/jov.23.12.6
PMID:37862008
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10615141/
Abstract

For decades, neural suppression in early visual cortex has been thought to be fixed. But recent work has challenged this assumption by showing that suppression can be reweighted based on recent history; when pairs of stimuli are repeatedly presented together, suppression between them strengthens. Here we investigate the temporal dynamics of this process using a steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) paradigm that provides a time-resolved, direct index of suppression between pairs of stimuli flickering at different frequencies (5 and 7 Hz). Our initial analysis of an existing electroencephalography (EEG) dataset (N = 100) indicated that suppression increases substantially during the first 2-5 seconds of stimulus presentation (with some variation across stimulation frequency). We then collected new EEG data (N = 100) replicating this finding for both monocular and dichoptic mask arrangements in a preregistered study designed to measure reweighting. A third experiment (N = 20) used source-localized magnetoencephalography and found that these effects are apparent in primary visual cortex (V1), consistent with results from neurophysiological work. Because long-standing theories propose inhibition/excitation differences in autism, we also compared reweighting between individuals with high versus low autistic traits, and with and without an autism diagnosis, across our three datasets (total N = 220). We find no compelling differences in reweighting that are associated with autism. Our results support the normalization reweighting model and indicate that for prolonged stimulation, increases in suppression occur on the order of 2-5 seconds after stimulus onset.

摘要

几十年来,人们一直认为早期视觉皮层的神经抑制是固定的。但最近的研究挑战了这一假设,表明抑制可以根据最近的历史重新加权;当一对刺激物反复同时呈现时,它们之间的抑制作用会增强。在这里,我们使用稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP)范式研究了这个过程的时间动态,该范式提供了一对以不同频率(5 和 7 Hz)闪烁的刺激物之间抑制的时间分辨、直接指数。我们对现有脑电图(EEG)数据集(N = 100)的初步分析表明,在刺激呈现的前 2-5 秒内,抑制作用会大幅增加(刺激频率略有变化)。然后,我们在一项预先注册的研究中收集了新的 EEG 数据(N = 100),该研究重复了单眼和双眼掩蔽安排的这一发现,旨在测量重新加权。第三个实验(N = 20)使用源定位的脑磁图,并发现这些效应在初级视觉皮层(V1)中很明显,与神经生理学工作的结果一致。由于长期存在的理论提出自闭症中存在抑制/兴奋差异,我们还比较了我们三个数据集(总 N = 220)中高自闭症特征与低自闭症特征个体、自闭症诊断与无自闭症诊断个体之间的重新加权。我们没有发现与自闭症相关的令人信服的重新加权差异。我们的结果支持归一化重新加权模型,并表明对于长时间刺激,抑制的增加发生在刺激开始后 2-5 秒左右。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcf/10615141/27f4b3f92c68/jovi-23-12-6-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcf/10615141/9e05bb2a0636/jovi-23-12-6-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcf/10615141/20999b8a252d/jovi-23-12-6-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcf/10615141/f13a05b50c58/jovi-23-12-6-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcf/10615141/a7c35fb15e1e/jovi-23-12-6-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcf/10615141/27f4b3f92c68/jovi-23-12-6-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcf/10615141/9e05bb2a0636/jovi-23-12-6-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcf/10615141/20999b8a252d/jovi-23-12-6-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcf/10615141/f13a05b50c58/jovi-23-12-6-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcf/10615141/a7c35fb15e1e/jovi-23-12-6-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcf/10615141/27f4b3f92c68/jovi-23-12-6-f005.jpg

相似文献

1
Temporal dynamics of normalization reweighting.归一化重加权的时间动态。
J Vis. 2023 Oct 4;23(12):6. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.12.6.
2
Local Interactions between Steady-State Visually Evoked Potentials at Nearby Flickering Frequencies.近频率闪烁时稳态视觉诱发电位的局部相互作用。
J Neurosci. 2022 May 11;42(19):3965-3974. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0180-22.2022. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
3
Neural markers of suppression in impaired binocular vision.双眼视觉障碍的神经抑制标记物。
Neuroimage. 2021 Apr 15;230:117780. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117780. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
4
Slower Binocular Rivalry in the Autistic Brain.自闭症大脑中双眼竞争更慢。
Curr Biol. 2019 Sep 9;29(17):2948-2953.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.07.026. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
5
Decoding emotion from high-frequency steady state visual evoked potential (SSVEP).从高频稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP)中解码情绪。
J Neurosci Methods. 2023 Jul 15;395:109919. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2023.109919. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
6
Neural dynamics during repetitive visual stimulation.重复视觉刺激期间的神经动力学
J Neural Eng. 2015 Dec;12(6):066017. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/12/6/066017. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
7
Effect of higher frequency on the classification of steady-state visual evoked potentials.更高频率对稳态视觉诱发电位分类的影响。
J Neural Eng. 2016 Feb;13(1):016014. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/1/016014. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
8
Contrast Normalization Accounts for Binocular Interactions in Human Striate and Extra-striate Visual Cortex.对比归一化解释了人类纹状和纹状外视觉皮层中的双眼相互作用。
J Neurosci. 2020 Mar 25;40(13):2753-2763. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2043-19.2020. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
9
Evaluating the feasibility of the steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) to study temporal attention.评估稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP)研究时间注意的可行性。
Psychophysiology. 2018 May;55(5):e13029. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13029. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
10
Effects of stimulation frequency and stimulation waveform on steady-state visual evoked potentials using a computer monitor.使用计算机显示器时,刺激频率和刺激波形对稳态视觉诱发电位的影响。
J Neural Eng. 2019 Oct 10;16(6):066007. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab2b7d.

引用本文的文献

1
An anti-Hebbian model for binocular visual plasticity and its attentional modulation.一种用于双眼视觉可塑性及其注意力调制的反赫布模型。
Commun Biol. 2025 Mar 12;8(1):418. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-07833-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Local Interactions between Steady-State Visually Evoked Potentials at Nearby Flickering Frequencies.近频率闪烁时稳态视觉诱发电位的局部相互作用。
J Neurosci. 2022 May 11;42(19):3965-3974. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0180-22.2022. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
2
In Our Own Words: The Complex Sensory Experiences of Autistic Adults.《自闭症成人的复杂感官体验:来自他们自己的声音》
J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Jul;52(7):3061-3075. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05186-3. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
3
Weaker neural suppression in autism.自闭症患者的神经抑制作用较弱。
Nat Commun. 2020 May 29;11(1):2675. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16495-z.
4
Contingent adaptation in masking and surround suppression.掩蔽和周围抑制中的偶然适应
Vision Res. 2020 Jan;166:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
5
Predicting neuronal dynamics with a delayed gain control model.基于时滞增益控制模型预测神经元动力学。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Nov 20;15(11):e1007484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007484. eCollection 2019 Nov.
6
Autism sensory dysfunction in an evolutionarily conserved system.自闭症在进化上保守的感觉系统中的功能障碍。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Dec 19;285(1893):20182255. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2255.
7
Temporal Contingencies Determine Whether Adaptation Strengthens or Weakens Normalization.时间关联决定适应是增强还是削弱正常化。
J Neurosci. 2018 Nov 21;38(47):10129-10142. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1131-18.2018. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
8
Intact perceptual bias in autism contradicts the decreased normalization model.自闭症中完整的知觉偏差与正常化模型降低的说法相矛盾。
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 22;8(1):12559. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31042-z.
9
The mechanism of short-term monocular deprivation is not simple: separate effects on parallel and cross-oriented dichoptic masking.短期单眼剥夺的机制并不简单:对平行和交叉定向双眼掩蔽有独立的影响。
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 18;8(1):6191. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24584-9.
10
Binocular response modulation in the lateral geniculate nucleus.外侧膝状体的双眼反应调制。
J Comp Neurol. 2019 Feb 15;527(3):522-534. doi: 10.1002/cne.24417. Epub 2018 Mar 9.