Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.
Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
J Neurosci. 2022 May 11;42(19):3965-3974. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0180-22.2022. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
Steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs) are widely used to index top-down cognitive processing in human electroencephalogram (EEG) studies. Typically, two stimuli flickering at different temporal frequencies (TFs) are presented, each producing a distinct response in the EEG at its flicker frequency. However, how SSVEP responses in EEGs are modulated in the presence of a competing flickering stimulus just because of sensory interactions is not well understood. We have previously shown in local field potentials (LFPs) recorded from awake monkeys that when two overlapping full-screen gratings are counterphased at different TFs, there is an asymmetric SSVEP response suppression, with greater suppression from lower TFs, which further depends on the relative orientations of the gratings (stronger suppression and asymmetry for parallel compared with orthogonal gratings). Here, we first confirmed these effects in both male and female human EEG recordings. Then, we mapped the response suppression of one stimulus (target) by a competing stimulus (mask) over a much wider range than the previous study. Surprisingly, we found that the suppression was not stronger at low frequencies in general, but systematically varied depending on the target TF, indicating local interactions between the two competing stimuli. These results were confirmed in both human EEG and monkey LFP and electrocorticogram (ECoG) data. Our results show that sensory interactions between multiple SSVEPs are more complex than shown previously and are influenced by both local and global factors, underscoring the need to cautiously interpret the results of studies involving SSVEP paradigms. Steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs) are extensively used in human cognitive studies and brain-computer interfacing applications where multiple stimuli flickering at distinct frequencies are concurrently presented in the visual field. We recently characterized interactions between competing flickering stimuli in animal recordings and found that stimuli flickering slowly produce larger suppression. Here, we confirmed these in human EEGs, and further characterized the interactions by using a much wider range of target and competing (mask) frequencies in both human EEGs and invasive animal recordings. These revealed a new "local" component, whereby the suppression increased when competing stimuli flickered at nearby frequencies. Our results highlight the complexity of sensory interactions among multiple SSVEPs and underscore the need to cautiously interpret studies involving SSVEP paradigms.
稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP)广泛应用于人类脑电图(EEG)研究中的自上而下的认知处理。通常,呈现两个以不同时间频率(TF)闪烁的刺激,每个刺激在其闪烁频率处产生独特的 EEG 响应。然而,由于感觉相互作用,当存在竞争闪烁刺激时,EEG 中的 SSVEP 响应如何被调制尚不清楚。我们之前在从清醒猴子记录的局部场电位(LFP)中表明,当两个重叠的全屏光栅以不同的 TF 反相时,存在不对称的 SSVEP 响应抑制,较低 TF 的抑制更大,这进一步取决于光栅的相对取向(与正交光栅相比,平行光栅的抑制更强且不对称)。在这里,我们首先在男性和女性人类 EEG 记录中证实了这些效应。然后,我们在比以前的研究更广泛的范围内映射了一个刺激(目标)被竞争刺激(掩蔽)抑制的情况。令人惊讶的是,我们发现一般来说,低频的抑制并不更强,而是系统地随目标 TF 而变化,这表明两个竞争刺激之间存在局部相互作用。这些结果在人类 EEG 和猴子 LFP 和脑电图(ECoG)数据中得到了证实。我们的结果表明,多个 SSVEP 之间的感觉相互作用比以前显示的更为复杂,并且受到局部和全局因素的影响,这突显了谨慎解释涉及 SSVEP 范式的研究结果的必要性。稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP)在人类认知研究和脑机接口应用中得到广泛应用,其中多个以不同频率闪烁的刺激同时呈现在视野中。我们最近在动物记录中描述了竞争闪烁刺激之间的相互作用,并发现缓慢闪烁的刺激产生更大的抑制。在这里,我们在人类 EEG 中证实了这一点,并通过在人类 EEG 和侵入性动物记录中使用更广泛的目标和竞争(掩蔽)频率范围进一步表征了相互作用。这揭示了一个新的“局部”成分,即当竞争刺激以附近频率闪烁时,抑制会增加。我们的结果强调了多个 SSVEP 之间感觉相互作用的复杂性,并强调了谨慎解释涉及 SSVEP 范式的研究的必要性。