• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于驾驶员同质聚类的风险场景下碰撞影响因素分析。

Analysis of factors affecting crash under risk scenarios based on driver homogenous clustering.

机构信息

School of Transportation, Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Jilin Research Center for Intelligent Transportation System, Changchun, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Oct 20;18(10):e0293307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293307. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0293307
PMID:37862359
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10588849/
Abstract

Research on road safety has focused on analyzing the factors that affect crashes. However, previous studies have often neglected differences in crash causation among heterogeneous clusters of drivers. In particular, the differences in the combined effect mechanisms of the factors in the risk scenarios have not been completely explained. Therefore, this study used the K-means algorithm to perform multidimensional feature homogeneous clustering for drivers involved in crashes and near-crashes. Structural equation modeling involving mediating effects was introduced to explore the direct and indirect effects of each influencing factor on vehicle crashes under risk scenarios and compare the differences in crash causation among different driver clusters. The results indicate that the drivers who experienced the risk scenarios can be classified into two homogeneous driver clusters. Significant differences exist in the demographic characteristics, intrinsic driving characteristics, and crash rates between them. In the risk scenario, traffic factors, distraction state, crash avoidance reaction, and maneuver judgment directly affect the crash outcomes of the two cluster drivers. Demographic characteristics and environmental factors have fewer direct influence on the crash outcomes of two-cluster drivers, but produce more complex mediating effects. Analysis of the differences in the influence of factors between clusters indicates that the fundamental cause of crashes for cluster 1 drivers includes poor driving skills. In contrast, cluster 2 drivers' crashes were more influenced by traffic conditions and their safety awareness. The analysis method of this study can be used to develop more targeted road safety policies to reduce the occurrence of vehicle crashes.

摘要

道路安全研究一直侧重于分析影响事故的因素。然而,以往的研究往往忽略了不同类型驾驶员群体在事故致因方面的差异。特别是,风险情景下各因素的综合影响机制的差异尚未得到充分解释。因此,本研究使用 K 均值算法对涉及事故和险肇事故的驾驶员进行多维特征同质聚类。引入中介效应结构方程模型,以探讨风险情景下各影响因素对车辆事故的直接和间接影响,并比较不同驾驶员群体的事故致因差异。结果表明,经历过风险情景的驾驶员可分为两个同质驾驶员群体。他们在人口统计学特征、内在驾驶特征和事故率方面存在显著差异。在风险情景下,交通因素、分心状态、避险反应和操作判断直接影响两个集群驾驶员的碰撞结果。人口统计学特征和环境因素对两个集群驾驶员碰撞结果的直接影响较小,但产生了更复杂的中介效应。对集群间因素影响差异的分析表明,集群 1 驾驶员碰撞的根本原因包括较差的驾驶技能。相比之下,集群 2 驾驶员的碰撞更多地受到交通状况和安全意识的影响。本研究的分析方法可用于制定更有针对性的道路安全政策,以减少车辆事故的发生。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed20/10588849/565917366716/pone.0293307.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed20/10588849/9d6e8699edd6/pone.0293307.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed20/10588849/6ccfb51e6cac/pone.0293307.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed20/10588849/3370344adb9d/pone.0293307.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed20/10588849/565917366716/pone.0293307.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed20/10588849/9d6e8699edd6/pone.0293307.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed20/10588849/6ccfb51e6cac/pone.0293307.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed20/10588849/3370344adb9d/pone.0293307.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed20/10588849/565917366716/pone.0293307.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of factors affecting crash under risk scenarios based on driver homogenous clustering.基于驾驶员同质聚类的风险场景下碰撞影响因素分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 20;18(10):e0293307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293307. eCollection 2023.
2
Comparison of teen and adult driver crash scenarios in a nationally representative sample of serious crashes.在全国具有代表性的严重撞车事故样本中,青少年与成年驾驶员撞车场景的比较。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Nov;72:302-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.016. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
3
Road safety from the perspective of driver gender and age as related to the injury crash frequency and road scenario.从驾驶员性别和年龄的角度来看道路安全与事故频率和道路场景的关系。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(1):25-33. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.794943.
4
In-depth analysis of crash contributing factors and potential ADAS interventions among at-risk drivers using the SHRP 2 naturalistic driving study.利用SHRP 2自然驾驶研究对高危驾驶员中碰撞致因因素及潜在的高级驾驶辅助系统干预措施进行深入分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(sup1):S68-S73. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1979529. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
5
Causation analysis of crashes and near crashes using naturalistic driving data.基于自然驾驶数据的事故与险肇事故致因分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Nov;177:106821. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106821. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
6
Analysis of near crashes among teen, young adult, and experienced adult drivers using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study.利用SHRP2自然驾驶研究对青少年、年轻成年人和经验丰富的成年驾驶员中的险些相撞事故进行分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 Feb 28;19(sup1):S89-S96. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1415433.
7
Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.乐观的看法:在“百车”数据中,行车时的扫视指标能区分撞车事故和险些撞车事故。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Oct;107:48-62. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
8
Characteristics of Single Vehicle Crashes with a Teen Driver in South Carolina, 2005-2008.2005-2008 年南卡罗来纳州青少年驾驶员单车事故特征分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jan;122:325-331. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
9
Autonomous driving testing scenario generation based on in-depth vehicle-to-powered two-wheeler crash data in China.基于中国深入的车对动力两轮车碰撞数据的自动驾驶测试场景生成。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Oct;176:106812. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106812. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
10
Definition of run-off-road crash clusters-For safety benefit estimation and driver assistance development.道路外碰撞事故群的定义——用于安全效益评估和驾驶员辅助开发。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Apr;113:97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

本文引用的文献

1
How do driving behavior and attitudes toward road safety vary between developed and developing countries? Evidence from Iran and the Netherlands.驾驶行为和道路安全态度在发达国家和发展中国家之间有何不同?来自伊朗和荷兰的证据。
J Safety Res. 2023 Jun;85:210-221. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.02.005. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
2
Multivariate analysis of roadway multi-fatality crashes using association rules mining and rules graph structures: A case study in China.基于关联规则挖掘和规则图结构的道路多死事故的多变量分析:中国的案例研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0276817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276817. eCollection 2022.
3
Causation analysis of crashes and near crashes using naturalistic driving data.
基于自然驾驶数据的事故与险肇事故致因分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Nov;177:106821. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106821. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
4
A hybrid neural network for driving behavior risk prediction based on distracted driving behavior data.基于驾驶分心行为数据的驾驶行为风险预测混合神经网络。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 25;17(1):e0263030. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263030. eCollection 2022.
5
Determining the risk of driver-at-fault events associated with common distraction types using naturalistic driving data.利用自然驾驶数据确定与常见分心类型相关的驾驶员过错事件的风险。
J Safety Res. 2021 Dec;79:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
6
Effects of an integrated collision warning system on risk compensation behavior: An examination under naturalistic driving conditions.综合碰撞预警系统对风险补偿行为的影响:自然驾驶条件下的检验。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Dec;163:106450. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106450. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
7
Analyzing traffic violations among motorcyclists using structural equation modeling.运用结构方程模型分析摩托车驾驶员违章行为。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2021 Dec;28(4):454-467. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2021.1942922. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
8
Mining patterns of near-crash events with and without secondary tasks.挖掘有和没有次要任务的近撞事故模式。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jul;157:106162. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106162. Epub 2021 May 11.
9
Modeling crash severity by considering risk indicators of driver and roadway: A Bayesian network approach.考虑驾驶员和道路风险指标的事故严重程度建模:贝叶斯网络方法。
J Safety Res. 2021 Feb;76:64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.11.006. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
10
The mediating effect of driver characteristics on risky driving behaviors moderated by gender, and the classification model of driver's driving risk.驾驶员特征对驾驶风险行为的中介效应,以及性别调节的分类模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Apr;153:106038. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106038. Epub 2021 Feb 22.