Department of Neuroscience and Behavioral Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Horm Behav. 2023 Nov;156:105441. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2023.105441. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
The scientific community widely recognizes that "sex" is a complex category composed of multiple physiologies. Yet in practice, basic scientific research often treats "sex" as a single, internally consistent, and often binary variable. This practice occludes important physiological factors and processes, and thus limits the scientific value of our findings. In human-oriented biomedical research, the use of simplistic (and often binary) models of sex ignores the existence of intersex, trans, non-binary, and gender non-conforming people and contributes to a medical paradigm that neglects their needs and interests. More broadly, our collective reliance on these models legitimizes a false paradigm of human biology that undergirds harmful medical practices and anti-trans political movements. Herein, we continue the conversations begun at the SBN 2022 Symposium on Hormones and Trans Health, providing guiding questions to help scientists deconstruct and rethink the use of "sex" across the stages of the scientific method. We offer these as a step toward a scientific paradigm that more accurately recognizes and represents sexed physiologies as multiple, interacting, variable, and unbounded by gendered preconceptions. We hope this paper will serve as a useful resource for scientists who seek a new paradigm for researching and understanding sexed physiologies that improves our science, widens the applicability of our findings, and deters the misuse of our research against marginalized groups.
科学界普遍认为,“性别”是一个由多种生理因素构成的复杂类别。然而,在实践中,基础科学研究往往将“性别”视为单一的、内在一致的,且常常是二元的变量。这种做法忽略了重要的生理因素和过程,从而限制了我们研究结果的科学价值。在以人为导向的生物医学研究中,使用简单化的(且常常是二元的)性别模型忽略了间性人、跨性别者、非二元性别者和性别不符合者的存在,导致医学范式忽视了他们的需求和利益。更广泛地说,我们集体依赖这些模型使一个错误的人类生物学范式合法化,这种范式支撑了有害的医疗实践和反跨性别政治运动。在此,我们继续在 SBN 2022 年激素与跨性别健康研讨会上展开的对话,提供指导问题,帮助科学家解构和重新思考在整个科学方法中使用“性别”的问题。我们希望这篇论文能为那些寻求研究和理解性别生理的新范式的科学家提供有用的资源,该范式能够更准确地认识和代表多种相互作用、多变且不受性别观念束缚的性别生理,从而提高我们的科学水平,扩大研究结果的适用性,并防止我们的研究被滥用来针对边缘化群体。