Suppr超能文献

通过牛奶中红外光谱和国际合作预测奶牛关键乳生物标志物

Prediction of key milk biomarkers in dairy cows through milk mid-infrared spectra and international collaborations.

作者信息

Grelet C, Larsen T, Crowe M A, Wathes D C, Ferris C P, Ingvartsen K L, Marchitelli C, Becker F, Vanlierde A, Leblois J, Schuler U, Auer F J, Köck A, Dale L, Sölkner J, Christophe O, Hummel J, Mensching A, Fernández Pierna J A, Soyeurt H, Calmels M, Reding R, Gelé M, Chen Y, Gengler N, Dehareng F

机构信息

Walloon Agricultural Research Center (CRA-W), Gembloux, Belgium, 5030.

Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark, DK-8830.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2024 Mar;107(3):1669-1684. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-23843. Epub 2023 Oct 19.

Abstract

At the individual cow level, suboptimum fertility, mastitis, negative energy balance, and ketosis are major issues in dairy farming. These problems are widespread on dairy farms and have an important economic impact. The objectives of this study were (1) to assess the potential of milk mid-infrared (MIR) spectra to predict key biomarkers of energy deficit (citrate, isocitrate, glucose-6 phosphate [glucose-6P], free glucose), ketosis (β-hydroxybutyrate [BHB] and acetone), mastitis (N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase activity [NAGase] and lactate dehydrogenase), and fertility (progesterone); (2) to test alternative methodologies to partial least squares (PLS) regression to better account for the specific asymmetric distribution of the biomarkers; and (3) to create robust models by merging large datasets from 5 international or national projects. Benefiting from this international collaboration, the dataset comprised a total of 9,143 milk samples from 3,758 cows located in 589 herds across 10 countries and represented 7 breeds. The samples were analyzed by reference chemistry for biomarker contents, whereas the MIR analyses were performed on 30 instruments from different models and brands, with spectra harmonized into a common format. Four quantitative methodologies were evaluated to address the strongly skewed distribution of some biomarkers. Partial least squares regression was used as the reference basis, and compared with a random modification of distribution associated with PLS (random-downsampling-PLS), an optimized modification of distribution associated with PLS (KennardStone-downsampling-PLS), and support vector machine (SVM). When the ability of MIR to predict biomarkers was too low for quantification, different qualitative methodologies were tested to discriminate low versus high values of biomarkers. For each biomarker, 20% of the herds were randomly removed within all countries to be used as the validation dataset. The remaining 80% of herds were used as the calibration dataset. In calibration, the 3 alternative methodologies outperform the PLS performances for the majority of biomarkers. However, in the external herd validation, PLS provided the best results for isocitrate, glucose-6P, free glucose, and lactate dehydrogenase (coefficient of determination in external herd validation [Rv] = 0.48, 0.58, 0.28, and 0.24, respectively). For other molecules, PLS-random-downsampling and PLS-KennardStone-downsampling outperformed PLS in the majority of cases, but the best results were provided by SVM for citrate, BHB, acetone, NAGase, and progesterone (Rv = 0.94, 0.58, 0.76, 0.68, and 0.15, respectively). Hence, PLS and SVM based on the entire dataset provided the best results for normal and skewed distributions, respectively. Complementary to the quantitative methods, the qualitative discriminant models enabled the discrimination of high and low values for BHB, acetone, and NAGase with a global accuracy around 90%, and glucose-6P with an accuracy of 83%. In conclusion, MIR spectra of milk can enable quantitative screening of citrate as a biomarker of energy deficit and discrimination of low and high values of BHB, acetone, and NAGase, as biomarkers of ketosis and mastitis. Finally, progesterone could not be predicted with sufficient accuracy from milk MIR spectra to be further considered. Consequently, MIR spectrometry can bring valuable information regarding the occurrence of energy deficit, ketosis, and mastitis in dairy cows, which in turn have major influences on their fertility and survival.

摘要

在个体奶牛层面,繁殖力欠佳、乳腺炎、负能量平衡和酮病是奶牛养殖中的主要问题。这些问题在奶牛场广泛存在,并具有重要的经济影响。本研究的目的是:(1)评估牛奶中红外(MIR)光谱预测能量缺乏(柠檬酸盐、异柠檬酸、6-磷酸葡萄糖[glucose-6P]、游离葡萄糖)、酮病(β-羟基丁酸[BHB]和丙酮)、乳腺炎(N-乙酰-β-D-氨基葡萄糖苷酶活性[NAGase]和乳酸脱氢酶)及繁殖力(孕酮)关键生物标志物的潜力;(2)测试偏最小二乘法(PLS)回归的替代方法,以更好地解释生物标志物的特定不对称分布;(3)通过合并来自5个国际或国家项目的大型数据集创建稳健模型。受益于这种国际合作,数据集共包含来自10个国家589个牛群中3758头奶牛的9143份牛奶样本,代表7个品种。样本通过参考化学方法分析生物标志物含量,而MIR分析在30台不同型号和品牌的仪器上进行,光谱统一为通用格式。评估了四种定量方法以解决某些生物标志物强烈偏态分布的问题。偏最小二乘回归用作参考基准,并与与PLS相关的分布随机修正(随机下采样-PLS)、与PLS相关的分布优化修正(肯纳德-斯通下采样-PLS)以及支持向量机(SVM)进行比较。当MIR预测生物标志物的能力过低而无法进行定量时,测试了不同的定性方法以区分生物标志物的低值和高值。对于每种生物标志物,在所有国家内随机剔除20%的牛群用作验证数据集。其余80%的牛群用作校准数据集。在校准过程中,对于大多数生物标志物,三种替代方法的表现优于PLS。然而,在外部牛群验证中,PLS在异柠檬酸、葡萄糖-6P、游离葡萄糖和乳酸脱氢酶方面提供了最佳结果(外部牛群验证中的决定系数[Rv]分别为0.48、0.58、0.28和0.24)。对于其他分子,PLS-随机下采样和PLS-肯纳德-斯通下采样在大多数情况下表现优于PLS,但对于柠檬酸盐、BHB、丙酮、NAGase和孕酮,SVM提供了最佳结果(Rv分别为0.94、0.58、0.76、0.68和0.15)。因此,基于整个数据集的PLS和SVM分别在正态分布和偏态分布中提供了最佳结果。作为定量方法的补充,定性判别模型能够以约90%的全局准确率区分BHB、丙酮和NAGase的高值和低值,以及以83%的准确率区分葡萄糖-6P的高值和低值。总之,牛奶的MIR光谱能够对作为能量缺乏生物标志物的柠檬酸盐进行定量筛选,并区分作为酮病和乳腺炎生物标志物的BHB、丙酮和NAGase的低值和高值。最后,无法从牛奶MIR光谱中以足够的准确度预测孕酮,因此不再进一步考虑。因此,MIR光谱分析法可以提供有关奶牛能量缺乏、酮病和乳腺炎发生情况的有价值信息,而这些反过来又对它们的繁殖力和存活率有重大影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验