Suppr超能文献

在传导系统起搏植入时,经囊袋上方入路进行房室交界区消融。

Superior approach from the pocket for atrioventricular junction ablation performed at the time of conduction system pacing implantation.

作者信息

Palmisano Pietro, Parlavecchio Antonio, Crea Pasquale, Guido Alessandro, Accogli Michele, Coluccia Giovanni

机构信息

Cardiology Unit, "Card. G. Panico" Hospital, Tricase, Italy.

Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Dec;46(12):1652-1661. doi: 10.1111/pace.14849. Epub 2023 Oct 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conduction system pacing (CSP) and atrioventricular junction ablation (AVJA) improve outcomes in patients with symptomatic, refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). Superior approach (SA) from the pocket via axillary or subclavian vein has been proposed as an alternative to the conventional femoral venous access (FA) to perform AVJA.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility and safety of SA for AVJA performed simultaneously with CSP, and to compare this approach with FA.

METHODS

A prospective, observational study, enrolling consecutive patients with symptomatic, refractory AF undergoing simultaneous CSP and AVJA.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients were enrolled: in 50, AVJA was primarily attempted with SA, in 69 from FA. AVJA with SA was successful in 38 patients (76.0%), while in 12 patients, a subsequent FA was required. AVJA from FA was successful in 68 patients (98.5%), while in one patient, a left-sided approach via femoral artery was required. Compared with FA, SA was associated with a significantly longer duration of ablation (238.0 ± 218.2 vs. 161.9 ± 181.9 s; p = .035), a significantly shorter procedure time (28.1 ± 19.8 vs. 19.8 ± 16.8 min; p = .018), an earlier ambulation (2.7 ± 3.2 vs. 19.8 ± 0.1 h; p < .001), and an earlier discharge from procedure completion (24.0 ± 2.7 vs. 27.1 ± 5.1 h; p < .001). After a median follow-up of 12 months, the rate of complications was similar in the two groups (2.0% in SA, 4.3% in FA; p = .483).

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous CSP and AVJA with SA is feasible, with a safety profile similar to FA. Compared to FA, this approach reduces the procedure times and allows earlier ambulation and discharge.

摘要

背景

传导系统起搏(CSP)和房室结消融(AVJA)可改善有症状的难治性心房颤动(AF)患者的预后。已提出经腋窝或锁骨下静脉从囊袋进行的上腔途径(SA)作为进行AVJA的传统股静脉途径(FA)的替代方法。

目的

评估SA与CSP同时进行AVJA的可行性和安全性,并将该方法与FA进行比较。

方法

一项前瞻性观察性研究,纳入连续的有症状的难治性AF患者,同时进行CSP和AVJA。

结果

共纳入107例患者:50例主要尝试通过SA进行AVJA,69例通过FA进行。SA组38例(76.0%)成功完成AVJA,12例患者随后需要通过FA进行。FA组68例(98.5%)成功完成AVJA,1例患者需要通过股动脉进行左侧途径。与FA相比,SA组的消融持续时间明显更长(238.0±218.2秒对161.9±181.9秒;p = 0.035),手术时间明显更短(28.1±19.8分钟对19.8±16.8分钟;p = 0.018),下床活动更早(2.7±3.2小时对19.8±0.1小时;p < 0.001),术后出院更早(24.0±2.7小时对27.1±5.1小时;p < 0.001)。中位随访12个月后,两组并发症发生率相似(SA组为2.0%,FA组为4.3%;p = 0.483)。

结论

SA与CSP同时进行AVJA是可行的,安全性与FA相似。与FA相比,该方法缩短了手术时间,允许更早下床活动和出院。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验