Scott Christy K, Dennis Michael L, Grella Christine E, Watson Dennis P, Davis Jordan P, Hart M Kate
Chestnut Health Systems, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Chestnut Health Systems, Normal, Illinois, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2023 Oct;47(10):1964-1977. doi: 10.1111/acer.15172. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
Primary care settings like federally qualified health centers (FQHC) are optimal locations to identify individuals with substance use disorders (SUD) and link them to SUD treatment, yet successful linkage has proven difficult. Recovery management checkups for primary care (RMC-PC) is a promising method for increasing linkage to care, engagement in treatment, and reducing substance use.
Participants (n = 266) who received screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) at four FQHC sites and needed SUD treatment were randomized to receive SBIRT only or SBIRT+RMC-PC. All participants received SBIRT prior to randomization as part of usual care while those in the experimental group also received quarterly checkups. All participants completed research interviews at enrollment and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-enrollment. The primary outcome was whether participants received any days of SUD treatment. Key secondary outcomes were days of SUD treatment (total and by SUD level of care), days of alcohol or drug abstinence, and a reduction in days of specific substance use, all based on self-report.
Relative to participants receiving SBIRT only, participants assigned to SBIRT+RMC-PC were significantly more likely to have received any SUD treatment over 12 months (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.85) and more days of SUD treatment over 12 months (Cohen's effect size d = +0.41). The SBIRT+RMC-PC group also reported significantly more days of abstinence over 12 months (d = +0.30), fewer days of alcohol use (d = -0.20) and cannabis use (d = -0.20), and lower combined substance use frequency (d = -0.25). Days of treatment were found to positively mediate the direct effect of SBIRT+RMC-PC on days of abstinence.
This study provides further evidence of the effectiveness of the "referral to treatment" component of SBIRT when combined with RMC for patients in primary care settings, including those with drug use problems. Moreover, results demonstrate the value of repeated checkups on longer-term treatment and substance use outcomes.
像联邦合格健康中心(FQHC)这样的基层医疗场所是识别物质使用障碍(SUD)患者并将他们与SUD治疗相联系的理想地点,但事实证明,成功建立联系很困难。基层医疗康复管理检查(RMC-PC)是一种很有前景的方法,可增加与治疗的联系、提高治疗参与度并减少物质使用。
在四个FQHC场所接受筛查、简短干预及转介治疗(SBIRT)且需要SUD治疗的参与者(n = 266)被随机分为仅接受SBIRT组或SBIRT+RMC-PC组。所有参与者在随机分组前作为常规护理的一部分接受了SBIRT,而实验组的参与者还接受了季度检查。所有参与者在入组时以及入组后3、6、9和12个月完成了研究访谈。主要结局是参与者是否接受了任何天数的SUD治疗。关键次要结局包括SUD治疗天数(总计及按SUD护理级别)、戒酒或戒毒天数以及特定物质使用天数的减少,所有这些均基于自我报告。
与仅接受SBIRT的参与者相比,被分配到SBIRT+RMC-PC组的参与者在12个月内接受任何SUD治疗的可能性显著更高(调整优势比[AOR]=3.85),且在12个月内接受SUD治疗的天数更多(科恩效应量d = +0.41)。SBIRT+RMC-PC组在12个月内报告的戒酒天数也显著更多(d = +0.30),饮酒天数(d = -0.20)和大麻使用天数(d = -0.20)更少,且综合物质使用频率更低(d = -0.25)。发现治疗天数正向介导了SBIRT+RMC-PC对戒酒天数的直接影响。
本研究进一步证明了SBIRT的“转介治疗”部分与RMC相结合时对基层医疗场所患者(包括有药物使用问题的患者)的有效性。此外,结果证明了重复检查对长期治疗和物质使用结局的价值。