Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 5, 207 Bouverie St, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 5, 207 Bouverie St, Carlton 3010 Victoria, Australia.
Health Promot Int. 2023 Oct 1;38(5). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad134.
What is unknown about commercial lobbying is far greater than what is known. These omissions distort our understanding of the extent and nature of business influence on politics. Especially when businesses engage in practices that harm health, it is crucial for public health advocates to understand corporate lobbying to counter its influence. Our study proceeded in three phases. First, based on an international audit, we developed a list of the categories of information about lobbying that could be disclosed under four groups (lobby firms, lobbyists, organizations and activities) and benchmarked Australian lobbyist registers against this list. Second, we manually extracted data from lobbyist registers in eight jurisdictions, cleaned the data and created a relational model for analysis. Finally, we classified a sample of organizations as public health organizations or harmful industries to compare their activities. We identified 61 possible categories of information about lobbying in international lobbyist registers. When applied to Australian lobbyist registers, Queensland covered the widest range of categories (13, 21%), though many lacked detail and completeness. Australian lobbyist registers provided data on 462 third-party lobby firms across Australia, currently employing 1036 lobbyists and representing 4101 organizations. Several of these represented harmful industries, with gambling interests hiring the most third-party lobby firms. Ultimately, Australian lobbyist registers do not provide enough information to understand the full extent of lobbying activities taking place. Political transparency is important for public health actors to be able to monitor corporate political activity and to protect policy-making from vested interests.
商业游说活动的未知之处远远超过已知之处。这些遗漏扭曲了我们对企业对政治影响的程度和性质的理解。特别是当企业从事损害健康的行为时,公共卫生倡导者必须了解企业游说活动,以抵制其影响力。我们的研究分三个阶段进行。首先,根据国际审计,我们制定了一份可以在四个类别(游说公司、游说者、组织和活动)下披露的关于游说的信息类别清单,并将澳大利亚游说者登记册与该清单进行了基准比较。其次,我们从八个司法管辖区的游说者登记册中手动提取数据,清理数据并创建了一个关系模型进行分析。最后,我们将一个组织样本分类为公共卫生组织或有害行业,以比较它们的活动。我们在国际游说者登记册中确定了 61 种可能的游说信息类别。当应用于澳大利亚游说者登记册时,昆士兰州涵盖了最广泛的类别(13,21%),尽管许多类别缺乏细节和完整性。澳大利亚游说者登记册提供了澳大利亚各地 462 家第三方游说公司的数据,这些公司目前雇佣了 1036 名游说者,代表了 4101 家组织。其中一些代表了有害行业,赌博利益集团雇佣了最多的第三方游说公司。最终,澳大利亚游说者登记册没有提供足够的信息来了解正在进行的游说活动的全部范围。政治透明度对于公共卫生行为者来说非常重要,他们能够监督企业的政治活动,并保护政策制定免受既得利益的影响。