University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A.
The CORE Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A..
Arthroscopy. 2024 May;40(5):1445-1452. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.10.008. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
To determine whether preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) predict postoperative PROs and satisfaction following rotator cuff repair.
We retrospectively identified patients who underwent a primary rotator cuff repair at a single institution. A receiver operating characteristics analysis was used to reach a preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score threshold predictive of postoperative ASES and satisfaction scores. We evaluated patients above and below the receiver operating characteristics threshold by comparing their final ASES scores, ASES change (Δ) from baseline, percent maximum outcome improvement, and achievement of minimum clinically important differences, substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS). Fischer exact tests were used to analyze categorical data, and continuous data were analyzed using t-test.
A total of 348 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair were included in this study. The preoperative ASES value predictive of achieving SCB was 63 (area under the curve, 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 58-67; P < .001). Patients with preoperative ASES less than 63 were significantly more likely to achieve MCID (odds ratio [OR]: 4.7, P < .001) and SCB (OR:6.1, P < .001) and had significantly higher percent maximum outcome improvement (63% vs 41%; P = 0.003) and Δ ASES scores (36 vs 12; P < .001). However, patients with preoperative ASES scores above 63 had significantly higher final ASES scores (86 vs 79; P = .003), were more likely to achieve PASS (59% vs 48%; P = .045), and had higher satisfaction scores (7.4 vs 6.7; P = .024).
Patients with high preoperative ASES scores achieve less relative improvement; however, these patients may be more likely to achieve PASS and may have higher satisfaction scores postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.
确定术前患者报告的结局(PROs)是否可预测肩袖修复术后的 PROs 和满意度。
我们回顾性地确定了在一家单机构接受初次肩袖修复的患者。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析来确定术前美国肩肘外科医师协会(ASES)评分阈值,该阈值可预测术后 ASES 和满意度评分。我们通过比较最终 ASES 评分、基线 ASES 差值(Δ)、最大结局改善百分比和达到最小临床重要差异(MCID)、实质性临床获益(SCB)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS),来评估 ROC 阈值上下的患者。使用 Fisher 精确检验分析分类数据,使用 t 检验分析连续数据。
本研究共纳入 348 例接受肩袖修复的患者。术前 ASES 值预测达到 SCB 的临界值为 63(曲线下面积,0.75;95%置信区间:58-67;P<.001)。术前 ASES 小于 63 的患者更有可能达到 MCID(优势比[OR]:4.7,P<.001)和 SCB(OR:6.1,P<.001),且最大结局改善百分比(63% vs 41%;P=0.003)和 ASES 差值(36 比 12;P<.001)显著更高。然而,术前 ASES 评分大于 63 的患者最终 ASES 评分显著更高(86 比 79;P=.003),更有可能达到 PASS(59% vs 48%;P=.045),且满意度评分更高(7.4 比 6.7;P=.024)。
术前 ASES 评分高的患者相对改善较小;然而,这些患者可能更有可能达到 PASS,并且术后满意度评分可能更高。
III 级,回顾性比较预后试验。