• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DNA修复缺陷导致G2期染色单体放射敏感性增强和患癌易感性增加的生化证据。

Biochemical evidence for deficient DNA repair leading to enhanced G2 chromatid radiosensitivity and susceptibility to cancer.

作者信息

Gantt R, Parshad R, Price F M, Sanford K K

出版信息

Radiat Res. 1986 Nov;108(2):117-26.

PMID:3786672
Abstract

Human tumor cells and cells from cancer-prone individuals, compared with those from normal individuals, show a significantly higher incidence of chromatid breaks and gaps seen in metaphase cells immediately after G2 X irradiation. Previous studies with DNA repair-deficient mutants and DNA repair inhibitors strongly indicate that the enhancement results from a G2 deficiency(ies) in DNA repair. We report here biochemical evidence for a DNA repair deficiency that correlates with the cytogenetic studies. In the alkaline elution technique, after a pulse label with radioactive thymidine in the presence of 3-acetylaminobenzamide (a G2-phase blocker) and X irradiation, DNA from tumor or cancer-prone cells elutes more rapidly during the postirradiation period than that from normal cells. These results indicate that the DNA of tumor and cancer-prone cells either repairs more slowly or acquires more breaks than that of normal cells; breaks can accumulate during incomplete or deficient repair processes. The kinetic difference between normal and tumor or cancer-prone cells in DNA strand-break repair reaches a maximum within 2 h, and this maximum corresponds to the kinetic difference in chromatid aberration incidence following X irradiation reported previously. These findings support the concept that cells showing enhanced G2 chromatid radiosensitivity are deficient in DNA repair. The findings could also lead to a biochemical assay for cancer susceptibility.

摘要

与正常个体的细胞相比,人类肿瘤细胞以及癌症易感个体的细胞在G2期X射线照射后,中期细胞中染色单体断裂和裂隙的发生率显著更高。先前对DNA修复缺陷突变体和DNA修复抑制剂的研究有力地表明,这种增强是由DNA修复中的G2缺陷导致的。我们在此报告与细胞遗传学研究相关的DNA修复缺陷的生化证据。在碱性洗脱技术中,在存在3-乙酰氨基苯甲酰胺(一种G2期阻滞剂)的情况下用放射性胸苷进行脉冲标记并进行X射线照射后,肿瘤或癌症易感细胞的DNA在照射后洗脱得比正常细胞更快。这些结果表明,肿瘤和癌症易感细胞的DNA修复速度较慢或比正常细胞获得更多的断裂;断裂可在不完全或缺陷的修复过程中积累。正常细胞与肿瘤或癌症易感细胞在DNA链断裂修复方面的动力学差异在2小时内达到最大值,且该最大值与先前报道的X射线照射后染色单体畸变发生率的动力学差异相对应。这些发现支持了这样的概念,即显示出增强的G2染色单体放射敏感性的细胞存在DNA修复缺陷。这些发现还可能导致一种用于癌症易感性的生化检测方法。

相似文献

1
Biochemical evidence for deficient DNA repair leading to enhanced G2 chromatid radiosensitivity and susceptibility to cancer.DNA修复缺陷导致G2期染色单体放射敏感性增强和患癌易感性增加的生化证据。
Radiat Res. 1986 Nov;108(2):117-26.
2
Repair of chromosome damage induced by X-irradiation during G2 phase in a line of normal human fibroblasts and its malignant derivative.在一株正常人成纤维细胞及其恶性衍生物中,修复G2期X射线诱导的染色体损伤。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1982 Aug;69(2):409-14.
3
Chromosomal radiosensitivity of human tumor cells during the G2 cell cycle period.人类肿瘤细胞在G2细胞周期阶段的染色体放射敏感性。
Cancer Res. 1984 Dec;44(12 Pt 1):5577-82.
4
Susceptibility to fluorescent light-induced chromatid breaks associated with DNA repair deficiency and malignant transformation in culture.对与培养中的DNA修复缺陷和恶性转化相关的荧光诱导染色单体断裂的易感性。
Cancer Res. 1980 Dec;40(12):4415-9.
5
Cytogenetic response to G2-phase X irradiation in relation to DNA repair and radiosensitivity in a cancer-prone family with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.与李-佛美尼综合征这一癌症易感家族中的DNA修复及放射敏感性相关的G2期X射线照射的细胞遗传学反应
Radiat Res. 1993 Nov;136(2):236-40.
6
Chromosomal radiosensitivity during the G2 cell cycle period and cytopathology of human normal x tumor cell hybrids.G2细胞周期阶段的染色体放射敏感性及人正常x肿瘤细胞杂交体的细胞病理学
Cancer Res. 1986 Apr;46(4 Pt 2):2045-9.
7
Radioprotective effect of amifostine on cells from cancer prone patients and healthy individuals studied by the G2 and PCC assays.通过G2和早熟染色体凝集试验研究氨磷汀对癌症易感患者和健康个体细胞的辐射防护作用。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2003 Oct;79(10):831-8. doi: 10.1080/09553000310001610222.
8
Gamma-radiation-induced G2 delay, apoptosis, and p53 response as potential susceptibility markers for lung cancer.γ辐射诱导的G2期延迟、细胞凋亡和p53反应作为肺癌潜在的易感性标志物。
Cancer Res. 2001 Nov 1;61(21):7819-24.
9
Enhanced G2 chromatid radiosensitivity, an early stage in the neoplastic transformation of human epidermal keratinocytes in culture.
Cancer Res. 1987 Mar 1;47(5):1390-7.
10
A standardized G2-assay for the prediction of individual radiosensitivity.一种用于预测个体放射敏感性的标准化 G2 测定法。
Radiother Oncol. 2011 Oct;101(1):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.09.021. Epub 2011 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Challenges in Patients with Inborn Errors of Immunity with Different Manifestations of Immune Dysregulation.免疫缺陷病患者免疫调节异常不同表现形式的诊断挑战
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 20;11(14):4220. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144220.
2
G2-phase chromosomal radiosensitivity of primary fibroblasts from hereditary retinoblastoma family members and some apparently normal controls.遗传性视网膜母细胞瘤家族成员和一些明显正常对照者的原代纤维母细胞 G2 期染色体辐射敏感性。
Radiat Res. 2010 Jan;173(1):62-70. doi: 10.1667/RR1943.1.
3
Increased bleomycin-induced chromosome damage in lymphocytes of patients with common variable immunodeficiency indicates an involvement of chromosomal instability in their cancer predisposition.
普通可变免疫缺陷患者淋巴细胞中博来霉素诱导的染色体损伤增加,表明染色体不稳定参与了他们的癌症易感性。
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1989;29(4):303-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00199219.
4
Increased breakage of chromosome 1 in lymphocytes of patients with testicular cancer after bleomycin treatment in vitro.睾丸癌患者淋巴细胞经博来霉素体外处理后1号染色体断裂增加。
Br J Cancer. 1989 Apr;59(4):499-502. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1989.103.
5
Enhanced G2 chromatid radiosensitivity in dyskeratosis congenita fibroblasts.先天性角化不良成纤维细胞中增强的G2染色单体放射敏感性。
Am J Hum Genet. 1990 Feb;46(2):350-7.
6
Retinoid protection against x-ray-induced chromatid damage in human peripheral blood lymphocytes.维甲酸对人外周血淋巴细胞中X射线诱导的染色单体损伤的保护作用。
J Clin Invest. 1992 Nov;90(5):2069-74. doi: 10.1172/JCI116089.
7
Complementation of a DNA repair deficiency in six human tumor cell lines by chromosome 11.
Hum Genet. 1992 Mar;88(5):524-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00219338.