• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

方案：中低收入国家人道主义环境中经济发展干预措施的有效性：一项混合方法的系统评价。

PROTOCOL: Effectiveness of economic development interventions in humanitarian settings in low- and middle-income countries: A mixed-method systematic review.

作者信息

Malhotra Suchi Kapoor, Vigneri Marcella, Cruz Nina Ashley O Dela, MacDonald Heather, White Howard

机构信息

Campbell South Asia New Delhi India.

Global Development Network New Delhi India.

出版信息

Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 19;19(4):e1357. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1357. eCollection 2023 Dec.

DOI:10.1002/cl2.1357
PMID:37867635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10585609/
Abstract

This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The review will address the following research questions: (1) What are the effects of economic development interventions on the economic outcomes of people in humanitarian settings? What factors explain any observed variations in effect such as setting, programme design features or duration? (2) What are the effects of economic development interventions on the food security, nutrition, the psychosocial and mental health, and the physical health outcomes of populations in humanitarian settings? (3) What are the success factors and barriers that affect the implementation and effectiveness of economic development interventions on populations affected by humanitarian crisis?

摘要

这是一项坎贝尔系统评价的方案。该评价将探讨以下研究问题：（1）经济发展干预措施对人道主义环境中人们的经济成果有何影响？哪些因素可以解释所观察到的效果差异，如环境、项目设计特点或持续时间？（2）经济发展干预措施对人道主义环境中人群的粮食安全、营养、心理社会和心理健康以及身体健康成果有何影响？（3）影响针对受人道主义危机影响人群的经济发展干预措施实施和效果的成功因素和障碍有哪些？

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8b0/10585609/3919d106e3ad/CL2-19-e1357-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8b0/10585609/3919d106e3ad/CL2-19-e1357-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8b0/10585609/3919d106e3ad/CL2-19-e1357-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
PROTOCOL: Effectiveness of economic development interventions in humanitarian settings in low- and middle-income countries: A mixed-method systematic review.方案：中低收入国家人道主义环境中经济发展干预措施的有效性：一项混合方法的系统评价。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 19;19(4):e1357. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1357. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Mental health and psychosocial support programmes for adults in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review and meta-analysis in low and middle-income countries.人道主义紧急情况下针对成年人的心理健康和社会心理支持项目：低收入和中等收入国家的系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Oct 1;4(5):e001484. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001484. eCollection 2019.
3
Impact of social protection on gender equality in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of reviews.社会保护对低收入和中等收入国家性别平等的影响：一项综述的系统评价
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 May 25;18(2):e1240. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1240. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区，服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中，叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Psychological and social interventions for the promotion of mental health in people living in low- and middle-income countries affected by humanitarian crises.促进中低收入国家受人道主义危机影响人群心理健康的心理和社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 21;5(5):CD014300. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014300.pub2.
6
Evaluating effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a group psychological intervention using cognitive behavioural strategies for women with common mental disorders in conflict-affected rural Pakistan: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估针对巴基斯坦受冲突影响农村地区患有常见精神障碍的女性采用认知行为策略进行团体心理干预的有效性和成本效益：一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Apr 26;18(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1905-8.
7
Systematic review on the impacts of agricultural interventions on food security and nutrition in complex humanitarian emergency settings.关于农业干预措施对复杂人道主义紧急情况下粮食安全和营养影响的系统评价。
BMC Nutr. 2024 Apr 19;10(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40795-024-00864-8.
8
Improving mental health and psychosocial wellbeing in humanitarian settings: reflections on research funded through R2HC.改善人道主义环境中的心理健康和社会心理福祉：对通过R2HC资助的研究的思考
Confl Health. 2020 Oct 30;14(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13031-020-00317-6.
9
A systematic review of sexual and reproductive health interventions for young people in humanitarian and lower-and-middle-income country settings.在人道主义和中低收入国家环境下，针对年轻人的性与生殖健康干预措施的系统性综述。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 12;20(1):666. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08818-y.
10
Examining the use of economic evaluations in health-related humanitarian programmes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.考察经济评估在中低收入国家卫生相关人道主义项目中的应用：系统综述。
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Mar 1;35(2):210-218. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz144.

本文引用的文献

1
PROTOCOL: Strengthening women's empowerment and gender equality in fragile contexts towards peaceful and inclusive societies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.方案：在脆弱环境中增强妇女权能与性别平等以促进和平与包容社会：一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 28;17(3):e1180. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1180. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Human and economic impacts of natural disasters: can we trust the global data?自然灾害对人类和经济的影响：我们能相信全球数据吗？
Sci Data. 2022 Sep 16;9(1):572. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01667-x.
3
Natural hazards, disasters and violence against women and girls: a global mixed-methods systematic review.
自然灾害、灾害和暴力侵害妇女和女童行为：全球混合方法系统评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Apr;6(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004377.
4
Delivering water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to women and children in conflict settings: a systematic review.为冲突环境中的妇女和儿童提供水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施：系统评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jul;5(Suppl 1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002064.
5
Randomised controlled trial of a livestock productive asset transfer programme to improve economic and health outcomes and reduce intimate partner violence in a postconflict setting.一项牲畜生产性资产转移计划的随机对照试验，旨在改善冲突后环境中的经济和健康状况，并减少亲密伴侣暴力。
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Feb 28;2(1):e000165. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000165. eCollection 2017.
6
Systematic searching for theory to inform systematic reviews: is it feasible? Is it desirable?系统地寻找理论以指导系统评价：这可行吗？可取吗？
Health Info Libr J. 2015 Sep;32(3):220-35. doi: 10.1111/hir.12108. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
7
Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates.在效应量估计相关的元回归中进行稳健方差估计。
Res Synth Methods. 2010 Jan;1(1):39-65. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.5. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
8
Natural disasters, armed conflict, and public health.自然灾害、武装冲突与公共卫生。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 7;369(19):1836-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1109877.
9
"Best fit" framework synthesis: refining the method.“最佳拟合”框架综合法：方法的完善。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 13;13:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-37.