Sammoud Karima, Mahdi Zaynab, Benzaida Kamal, Elrhaffouli Yassine, Yamlahi Maryame, Gourinda Adil, Charif Faïza, Bousgheiri Fadila, Elbouri Hicham, Adil Najdi
Laboratory of Epidemiology and Public Health, Mohamed VI University Hospital of Tangier, Tangier, MAR.
Laboratory of Epidemiology and Public Health, Mohammed VI University Hospital of Tangier, Tangier, MAR.
Cureus. 2023 Sep 19;15(9):e45556. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45556. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Background The Mediterranean diet (MD) has been recognized by several studies as beneficial for health improvement. The degree of adherence to this diet has also been evaluated using several scales, particularly time-consuming measures such as the Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ). This study aims to (a) adapt into Moroccan Arabic the 14-item Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS), which is a simple and brief tool that assesses the degree of diet adherence and was used in the Prevencion con Dieta Mediterranea (PREDIMED) study, and (b) determine its psychometric properties. Methods MEDAS consists of 12 questions on food frequency and two on dietary habits, with each question scoring 0 or 1. To translate and adapt the scale, Beaton et al.'s six-step cross-cultural adaptation process guidelines were followed. The screener's psychometric properties were tested on staff at the CHU Mohammed VI (Tangier), i.e., the hospital's administrative and maintenance staff, excluding medical and paramedical personnel. Internal consistency was evaluated using the Kuder-Richardson 21 (K-R 21) formula, while test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Moreover, criterion validity was performed using the Spearman correlation between the MEDAS and the MedQ-Sus scores. Discrimination performance was also tested using the receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results The validation study included 160 participants who completed both questionnaires. The K-R 21 formula estimated strong internal consistency in the range of 0.851. The ICC of test-retest reliability was significant at 0.876 95% CI [0.831-0.909]. The MEDAS score correlated significantly with the comparative MedQ-Sus score (Spearman's rho = 0.494 95% CI [0.363-0.606], p < 0.001). Also, MEDAS can strongly distinguish between MD adherence and non-adherence (optimal cut-off = 7.5, sensitivity 0.81, specificity = 0.57), with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.743 95% CI [0.667-0.819], p < 0.001. Conclusion The results showed that MEDAS is a valid and time-saving instrument for assessing adherence to the MD in the Moroccan population.
背景 多项研究已证实地中海饮食(MD)对改善健康有益。人们也使用多种量表评估对这种饮食的依从程度,尤其是诸如食物频率问卷(FFQ)这类耗时的测量方法。本研究旨在:(a)将14项地中海饮食依从性筛查工具(MEDAS)改编为摩洛哥阿拉伯语版本,该工具简单且简短,用于评估饮食依从程度,曾在预防地中海饮食(PREDIMED)研究中使用;(b)确定其心理测量特性。方法 MEDAS由12个关于食物频率的问题和2个关于饮食习惯的问题组成,每个问题得0分或1分。为翻译和改编该量表,遵循了比顿等人的跨文化适应过程六步指南。在穆罕默德六世大学医院(丹吉尔)的工作人员中测试了该筛查工具的心理测量特性,即医院的行政和维护人员,不包括医疗和辅助医疗人员。使用库德 - 理查森21(K - R 21)公式评估内部一致性,使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估重测信度。此外,通过MEDAS与MedQ - Sus得分之间的斯皮尔曼相关性进行效标效度检验。还使用接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线测试区分性能。结果 验证研究纳入了160名完成两份问卷的参与者。K - R 21公式估计内部一致性较强,范围为0.851。重测信度的ICC在0.876(95% CI [0.831 - 0.909])时具有显著性。MEDAS得分与比较性的MedQ - Sus得分显著相关(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数rho = 0.494,95% CI [0.363 - 0.606],p < 0.001)。此外,MEDAS能够很好地区分MD依从者和非依从者(最佳截断值 = 7.5,敏感性 = 0.81,特异性 = 0.57),曲线下面积(AUC)值为0.743(95% CI [0.667 - 0.819]),p < 0.001。结论 结果表明,MEDAS是评估摩洛哥人群对MD依从性的有效且省时的工具。