Noninvasive left ventricular pressure-strain myocardial work in patients with well-functioning bicuspid aortic valves and aortic dilation: a preliminary study.

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive left ventricular pressure-strain myocardial work (MW) is a novel method for evaluating left ventricular function that integrates myocardial deformation and afterload and has certain advantages over global longitudinal strain (GLS). The study aimed to analyze MW in patients with well-functioning bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and explore the influences of aortic dilation and arterial stiffness on left ventricular function.

METHODS

A total of 104 patients with well-functioning BAVs and 50 controls were enrolled in our study. Global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW), global work efficiency (GWE), GLS, and aortic stiffness index were measured. Based on the ascending aortic diameter, patients with BAV were divided into 3 subgroups (nondilated, mildly dilated, and moderately dilated).

RESULTS

GWI, GCW, GWW, and aortic stiffness index were significantly increased (P<0.001, P=0.023, P<0.001, and P<0.001, respectively), while GWE and GLS were significantly decreased among patients with BAV compared with controls (all P values <0.001). Patients with BAV and mildly and moderately dilated aortas had an increased GWW and aortic stiffness index but a decreased GWE compared with patients with BAV and nondilated aortas (all P values <0.05); meanwhile, GCW and GLS did not differ among the BAV subgroups (all P values >0.05). GWI was elevated in patients with BAV and moderately dilated aortas compared with patients with BAV and nondilated aortas (P<0.05). On multivariable analysis, the aortic stiffness index was an independent influencer of GWI, GCW, GWW, and GWE (P=0.025, P=0.049, P<0.001, and P=0.001, respectively). The aortic diameter was highly correlated with the aortic stiffness index (r=0.863; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

MW could assess early myocardial impairment in patients with well-functioning BAV. MW may help to differentiate the detrimental effect of aortic dilation on left ventricular function, whereas GLS may not.