Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Sep;15(9):1545-1559. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.03.024. Epub 2022 May 11.
Ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) can be evaluated as the ratio between arterial stiffness (pulsed wave velocity [PWV]) and myocardial deformation (global longitudinal strain [GLS]).
This study aimed to evaluate VAC across the spectrum of heart failure (HF).
The authors introduced a Doppler-derived, single-beat technique to estimate aortic arch PWV (aa-PWV) in addition to tonometry-derived carotid-femoral PWV (cf-PWV). They measured PWVs and GLS in 155 healthy controls, 75 subjects at risk of developing HF (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association stage A-B) and 236 patients in stage C heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n = 104) or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n = 132). They evaluated peak oxygen consumption and peripheral extraction using combined cardiopulmonary-echocardiography exercise stress.
aa-PWV was obtainable in all subjects and significantly lower than cf-PWV in all subgroups (P < 0.01). PWVs were directly related and increased with age (all P < 0.0001). cf-PWV/GLS was similarly compromised in HFrEF (1.09 ± 0.35) and HFpEF (1.05 ± 0.21), whereas aa-PWV/GLS was more impaired in HFpEF (0.70 ± 0.10) than HFrEF (0.61 ± 0.14; P < 0.01). Stage A-B had values of cf-PWV/GLS and aa-PWV/GLS (0.67 ± 0.27 and 0.48 ± 0.14, respectively) higher than controls (0.46 ± 0.11 and 0.39 ± 0.10, respectively) but lower than stage C (all P < 0.01). Peak arteriovenous oxygen difference (AVOdiff) was inversely related with cf-PWV/GLS and aa-PWV/GLS (all P < 0.01). Although cf-PWV/GLS and aa-PWV/GLS independently predicted peak VO in the overall population (adjusted R = 0.33 and R= 0.36; all P < 0.0001), only aa-PWV/GLS was independently associated with flow reserve during exercise (R = 0.52; P < 0.0001).
Abnormal VAC is directly correlated with greater severity of HF and worse functional capacity. HFpEF shows a worse VAC than HFrEF when expressed by aa-PWV/GLS.
心室-动脉偶联(VAC)可以通过动脉僵硬度(脉搏波速度[PWV])和心肌变形(整体纵向应变[GLS])的比值来评估。
本研究旨在评估心力衰竭(HF)谱中的 VAC。
作者引入了一种多普勒衍生的单次搏动技术来估计主动脉弓 PWV(aa-PWV),此外还使用了容积描记法衍生的颈股 PWV(cf-PWV)。他们在 155 名健康对照者、75 名有发生 HF 风险的患者(美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会 A 期-B 期)和 236 名射血分数保留性心力衰竭(HFpEF)(n=104)或射血分数降低性心力衰竭(HFrEF)(n=132)患者中测量了 PWVs 和 GLS。他们使用心肺超声心动图运动应激联合评估了峰值耗氧量和外周提取。
aa-PWV 可在所有受试者中获得,并且在所有亚组中均显著低于 cf-PWV(均 P<0.01)。PWVs 与年龄直接相关,并随年龄增长而增加(均 P<0.0001)。cf-PWV/GLS 在 HFrEF(1.09±0.35)和 HFpEF(1.05±0.21)中同样受损,而 aa-PWV/GLS 在 HFpEF 中(0.70±0.10)比 HFrEF 中(0.61±0.14)受损更严重(P<0.01)。A 期-B 期 cf-PWV/GLS 和 aa-PWV/GLS 的值(分别为 0.67±0.27 和 0.48±0.14)高于对照组(分别为 0.46±0.11 和 0.39±0.10),但低于 C 期(均 P<0.01)。峰值动静脉氧差(AVOdiff)与 cf-PWV/GLS 和 aa-PWV/GLS 呈负相关(均 P<0.01)。尽管 cf-PWV/GLS 和 aa-PWV/GLS 可独立预测总体人群中的峰值 VO(校正 R=0.33 和 R=0.36;均 P<0.0001),但只有 aa-PWV/GLS 与运动时的血流储备独立相关(R=0.52;P<0.0001)。
异常的 VAC 与 HF 的严重程度和功能能力的恶化直接相关。HFpEF 的 aa-PWV/GLS 比 HFrEF 更差。