SC Rianimazione e Anestesia, Ospedale Nuovo di Legnano, ASST Ovest Milanese, Legnano, Italy.
SC Anestesia e Rianimazione II, Ospedale San Carlo Borromeo, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milano, Italy.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Dec;35(12):e14694. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14694. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
Constipation is frequent in critically ill patients, and potentially related to adverse outcomes. Peripherally-active mu-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) are approved for opioid-induced constipation, but information on their efficacy and safety in critically ill patients is limited. We present a single-center, retrospective, case-series of the use of naldemedine for opioid-associated constipation, and we systematically reviewed the use of PAMORAs in critically ill patients.
Case-series included consecutive mechanically-ventilated patients; constipation was defined as absence of bowel movements for >3 days. Naldemedine was administered after failure of the local laxation protocol. Systematic review: PubMed was searched for studies of PAMORAs to treat opioid-induced constipation in adult critically ill patients.
time to laxation, and number of patients laxating at the shortest follow-up.
gastric residual volumes and adverse events.
A total of 13 patients were included in the case-series; the most common diagnosis was COVID-19 ARDS. Patients had their first bowel movement 1 [0;2] day after naldemedine. Daily gastric residual volume was 725 [405;1805] before vs. 250 [45;1090] mL after naldemedine, p = 0.0078. Systematic review identified nine studies (two RCTs, one prospective case-series, three retrospective case-series and three case-reports). Outcomes were similar between groups, with a trend toward a lower gastric residual volume in PAMORAs group.
CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: In a highly-selected case-series of patients with refractory, opioid-associated constipation, naldemedine was safe and associated to reduced gastric residuals and promoting laxation. In the systematic review and meta-analysis, the use of PAMORAs (mainly methylnaltrexone) was safe and associated with a reduced intolerance to enteral feeding but no difference in the time to laxation.
危重症患者常发生便秘,且可能与不良结局相关。外周作用型μ-阿片受体拮抗剂(PAMORAs)获批用于治疗阿片类药物引起的便秘,但有关其在危重症患者中的疗效和安全性的数据有限。我们报告了一项单中心、回顾性、病例系列研究,研究了纳洛酮用于治疗阿片类药物相关便秘的情况,并对 PAMORAs 在危重症患者中的应用进行了系统评价。
病例系列研究纳入了连续接受机械通气的患者;便秘定义为超过 3 天无排便。在局部通便方案失败后给予纳洛酮。系统评价:在 PubMed 上检索了关于 PAMORAs 治疗成人危重症患者阿片类药物诱导性便秘的研究。
通便时间和最短随访时通便的患者人数。
胃残留量和不良事件。
共纳入 13 例患者,最常见的诊断是 COVID-19 导致的急性呼吸窘迫综合征。患者在给予纳洛酮后第 1 天[0;2]天首次排便。纳洛酮治疗前,每日胃残留量为 725 [405;1805]ml,治疗后为 250 [45;1090]ml,p=0.0078。系统评价共纳入 9 项研究(2 项 RCT、1 项前瞻性病例系列研究、3 项回顾性病例系列研究和 3 项病例报告)。各组间结局相似,PAMORAs 组胃残留量有降低趋势。
在一组难治性阿片类药物相关便秘的高度选择病例系列中,纳洛酮是安全的,可减少胃残留量并促进通便。在系统评价和荟萃分析中,PAMORAs(主要是甲基纳曲酮)的使用是安全的,与减少对肠内喂养的不耐受有关,但通便时间无差异。