• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 与流感和肺炎的医疗保健成本比较。

Health care costs of COVID-19 vs influenza and pneumonia.

机构信息

Johnson & Johnson, 410 George St, New Brunswick, NJ 08901. Email:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2023 Oct;29(10):509-514. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2023.89439.

DOI:10.37765/ajmc.2023.89439
PMID:37870544
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To estimate payments for the treatment of COVID-19 compared with that of influenza or viral pneumonia (IP), from the perspective of the US payer.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis.

METHODS

Patients with COVID-19 during the period from October 1, 2020, to February 1, 2021, or IP during the period from October 1, 2018, to February 1, 2019, in the IBM MarketScan databases were identified. The index was defined as the date of the first COVID-19 or IP diagnosis. Patients with COVID-19 were stratified by severity. Variables for all patients included demographics and comorbidities at the time of index and duration of disease. IP and COVID-19 cohorts were matched using propensity scores, and inflation-adjusted all-cause payments (ACP), and disease-specific payments (DSP) for IP vs COVID-19 were estimated using generalized linear models.

RESULTS

Matched cohorts included 6332 Medicare (female, 58.5%; mean [SD] age, 75.3 [7.6] years), and 397,532 commercially insured patients (female, 57.6%; mean [SD] age, 34.7 [16.7] years). ACP and DSP were significantly higher in the COVID-19 cohort vs IP cohort. Payments for severe/critical COVID-19 were significantly greater than those for IP, with adjusted marginal incremental DSP and ACP of $24,852 (95% CI, $21,573-$28,132) and $50,325 (95% CI, $43,932-$56,718), respectively. IP was significantly less expensive than moderate COVID-19 for commercial payers but not Medicare. IP was more expensive than mild COVID-19 for all payers.

CONCLUSIONS

Payments associated with severe/critical COVID-19 significantly exceeded those associated with IP. For Medicare, IP was more expensive than mild or moderate COVID-19. For commercial payers, IP was less expensive than moderate COVID-19 but more expensive than mild COVID-19.

摘要

目的

从美国支付方的角度估计 COVID-19 治疗费用与流感或病毒性肺炎(IP)治疗费用的对比。

研究设计

回顾性队列分析。

方法

在 IBM MarketScan 数据库中,确定了 2020 年 10 月 1 日至 2021 年 2 月 1 日期间患有 COVID-19 的患者或 2018 年 10 月 1 日至 2019 年 2 月 1 日期间患有 IP 的患者。指数定义为 COVID-19 或 IP 首次诊断的日期。根据严重程度对 COVID-19 患者进行分层。所有患者的变量包括指数时的人口统计学特征和合并症以及疾病持续时间。使用倾向评分匹配 COVID-19 与 IP 患者,使用广义线性模型估计 IP 与 COVID-19 的通胀调整全因支付(ACP)和疾病特异性支付(DSP)。

结果

匹配队列包括 6332 名 Medicare(女性占 58.5%;平均[标准差]年龄为 75.3[7.6]岁)和 397,532 名商业保险患者(女性占 57.6%;平均[标准差]年龄为 34.7[16.7]岁)。COVID-19 队列的 ACP 和 DSP 明显高于 IP 队列。严重/危重症 COVID-19 的支付明显高于 IP,调整后的边际增量 DSP 和 ACP 分别为 24852 美元(95%CI,21573 美元至 28132 美元)和 50325 美元(95%CI,43932 美元至 56718 美元)。对于商业支付方,IP 比中度 COVID-19 的费用更低,但 Medicare 并非如此。对于所有支付方,IP 比轻度 COVID-19 的费用更高。

结论

严重/危重症 COVID-19 相关的支付明显高于 IP。对于 Medicare,IP 比轻度或中度 COVID-19 的费用更高。对于商业支付方,IP 比中度 COVID-19 的费用更低,但比轻度 COVID-19 的费用更高。

相似文献

1
Health care costs of COVID-19 vs influenza and pneumonia.COVID-19 与流感和肺炎的医疗保健成本比较。
Am J Manag Care. 2023 Oct;29(10):509-514. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2023.89439.
2
Insurer costs of COVID-19 by disease severity and duration.按疾病严重程度和持续时间划分的 COVID-19 保险成本。
Am J Manag Care. 2024 Mar;30(3):124-129. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89513.
3
Direct health care costs associated with COVID-19 in the United States.美国与 COVID-19 相关的直接医疗保健成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Sep;28(9):936-947. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.22050. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
4
Real-World Economic Outcomes During Time on Treatment Among Patients Who Initiated Sunitinib or Pazopanib as First Targeted Therapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of Medicare Claims Data.真实世界中接受舒尼替尼或帕唑帕尼作为晚期肾细胞癌一线靶向治疗的患者在治疗期间的经济学结局:基于医疗保险索赔数据的回顾性分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jun;24(6):525-533. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.6.525.
5
Incremental health care resource utilization and economic burden of venous thromboembolism recurrence from a U.S. payer perspective.从美国医保支付方角度看静脉血栓栓塞复发导致的医疗保健资源利用增加及经济负担
J Manag Care Pharm. 2014 Feb;20(2):174-86. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.2.174.
6
Clinical and economic characterization of mild, moderate, and severe systemic lupus erythematosus: Real-world observation across payer channels in the United States.轻度、中度和重度系统性红斑狼疮的临床和经济学特征:美国支付渠道的真实世界观察。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Sep;29(9):1010-1020. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.9.1010.
7
Incidence, costs and post-operative complications following ankle fracture - A US claims database analysis.踝关节骨折的发病率、费用和术后并发症——一项美国索赔数据库分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 26;23(1):1129. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-06095-x.
8
Incremental Health Care Burden of Bleeding Among Patients with Venous Thromboembolism in the United States.美国静脉血栓栓塞症患者出血的增量医疗负担。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Oct;21(10):965-72. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.10.965.
9
Burden of venous leg ulcers in the United States.美国下肢静脉溃疡的负担。
J Med Econ. 2014 May;17(5):347-56. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.903258. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
10
All-cause and potentially disease-related health care costs associated with venous thromboembolism in commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid beneficiaries.商业保险、医疗保险和医疗补助受益人群中,与静脉血栓栓塞相关的全因和潜在疾病相关的医疗保健费用。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Jun;18(5):363-74. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.5.363.

引用本文的文献

1
Resource utilisation and cost of hospitalisation with community-acquired pneumonia among older adults in India, 2018-2020.2018 - 2020年印度老年人社区获得性肺炎的资源利用与住院费用
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Jul 3;3(2):e001727. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001727. eCollection 2025.
2
Uptake of Influenza Vaccine among Older Adults with Cardiovascular Comorbidities.患有心血管合并症的老年人对流感疫苗的接种情况。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025 Mar;122(3):e20240537. doi: 10.36660/abc.20240537.