• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国因孔源性视网膜脱离而就诊于急诊科的患者在全国范围内的人口统计学差异。

NATIONWIDE DEMOGRAPHIC DISPARITIES IN UNITED STATES EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT VISITS IN PATIENTS WITH RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; and.

出版信息

Retina. 2023 Nov 1;43(11):1936-1944. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003897.

DOI:10.1097/IAE.0000000000003897
PMID:37870908
Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Within the evolving landscape of healthcare in the United States (US), delineating the demographic nuances and financial implications of emergent conditions, such as rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD), is paramount. This study seeks to analyze the demographic and hospital billing amount/cost of service disparities in RRD visits to emergency departments (EDs) nationwide.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional, population-based study using International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision , and Current Procedural Terminology codes in the 2016 to 2019 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample databases to identify RRD visits. The analysis included demographics, hospital billing amount, and cost of service of RRD ED management.

RESULTS

A total of 12,492 RRD encounters were identified with men constituting 64% and a prominent age group being 50 to 64 years (49.3%). Most patients (90%) were managed in metropolitan teaching hospitals, predominantly in the southern U.S. region (56.1%). Private insurance covered 45% of patients. Same-day RRD repair odds increased in November and December. Whites had a higher likelihood for same-day treatment. Hospital billing amount rose from $23,600 in 2016 to $30,354 in 2019, with stable mean total cost of service. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment ED visit incidence did not show seasonal variation ( P = 0.819).

CONCLUSION

Most patients with RRD in U.S, EDs were middle-aged men, with Whites more likely to receive same-day repair. There was no sex bias observed in same-day repair decision-making. Although hospital billing amount increased over the study period, total cost of service remained stable. The incidence of RRD ED visits showed no seasonal variation.

摘要

背景/目的:在美国(US)不断发展的医疗保健领域,描绘新兴病症(如孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD))的人口统计学细节和财务影响至关重要。本研究旨在分析全国急诊部(ED)RRD就诊的人口统计学和医院计费金额/服务成本差异。

方法

我们使用 2016 年至 2019 年全国急诊部抽样数据库中的国际疾病分类第 10 版和当前程序术语代码进行回顾性、横断面、基于人群的研究,以确定 RRD 就诊。分析包括 RRD ED 管理的人口统计学、医院计费金额和服务成本。

结果

共确定了 12492 例 RRD 就诊,其中男性占 64%,年龄较大的群体为 50 至 64 岁(49.3%)。大多数患者(90%)在大都市教学医院接受治疗,主要集中在美国南部地区(56.1%)。私人保险覆盖了 45%的患者。RRD 修复的当日手术几率在 11 月和 12 月增加。白人更有可能接受当日治疗。医院计费金额从 2016 年的 23600 美元增加到 2019 年的 30354 美元,而平均总成本保持稳定。RRD ED 就诊的发生率没有季节性变化(P=0.819)。

结论

美国 ED 中大多数 RRD 患者为中年男性,白人更有可能接受当日修复。在当日修复决策中没有观察到性别偏见。尽管研究期间医院计费金额有所增加,但总服务成本保持稳定。RRD ED 就诊的发生率没有季节性变化。

相似文献

1
NATIONWIDE DEMOGRAPHIC DISPARITIES IN UNITED STATES EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT VISITS IN PATIENTS WITH RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT.美国因孔源性视网膜脱离而就诊于急诊科的患者在全国范围内的人口统计学差异。
Retina. 2023 Nov 1;43(11):1936-1944. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003897.
2
Demographics and Seasonality of Retinal Detachment, Retinal Breaks, and Posterior Vitreous Detachment from the Intelligent Research in Sight Registry.来自视力智能研究注册库的视网膜脱离、视网膜裂孔和玻璃体后脱离的人口统计学特征与季节性
Ophthalmol Sci. 2022 Mar 18;2(2):100145. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2022.100145. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Frequency of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment after Intravitreal Therapy in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者玻璃体内治疗后孔源性视网膜脱离的频率。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 Oct;4(10):973-978. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.03.028. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
4
Epidemiology of Penile Fractures in United States Emergency Departments: Access to Care Disparities May Lead to Suboptimal Outcomes.美国急诊部阴茎骨折的流行病学:获得治疗的差异可能导致治疗效果不理想。
J Sex Med. 2019 Feb;16(2):248-256. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.12.009.
5
Five year nationwide incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment requiring surgery in Korea.韩国需要手术治疗的孔源性视网膜脱离的五年全国发病率。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 13;8(11):e80174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080174. eCollection 2013.
6
Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Taiwan.台湾孔源性视网膜脱离的流行病学及临床特征
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep;100(9):1216-20. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307481. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
7
Meteorological factors and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in metropolitan France.法国大都市的气象因素与孔源性视网膜脱离。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 14;14(1):18857. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69591-1.
8
The incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in The Netherlands.荷兰孔源性视网膜脱离的发病率。
Ophthalmology. 2013 Mar;120(3):616-622. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.001. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
9
Choice of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair Method in US Commercially Insured and Medicare Advantage Patients, 2003-2016.2003-2016 年美国商业保险和医疗保险优势计划患者原发性孔源性视网膜脱离修复方法的选择。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec;196:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.08.024. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
10
Sociodemographic Factors Influencing Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Presentation and Outcome.影响孔源性视网膜脱离表现和结局的社会人口学因素。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2021 Apr;5(4):337-341. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Seasonality of Retinal Detachment: Peaks, Troughs, and Global Trends.视网膜脱离的季节性:高峰、低谷及全球趋势。
Life (Basel). 2025 Jan 27;15(2):190. doi: 10.3390/life15020190.
2
Meteorological factors and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in metropolitan France.法国大都市的气象因素与孔源性视网膜脱离。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 14;14(1):18857. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69591-1.
3
Implications of Neighborhood- and Patient-Level Factors for Eye Care.社区及患者层面因素对眼科护理的影响
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 1;142(9):854-855. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.3066.